· Private foundation
The Wally Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k31 grants · $64k
- $10k–50k22 grants · $465k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GLOBAL GOODS PARTNERS | $45,000 |
| HARVESTERS | $40,000 |
| CHILDREN'S MERCY HOSPITAL | $40,000 |
| KANSAS CITY GIRLS PREPARATORY ACADEMY | $30,000 |
| KANSAS CITY HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE | $30,000 |
| MAYO CLINIC | $30,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD- GREAT PLAINS | $25,000 |
| JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICES | $25,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES | $25,000 |
| OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH | $25,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $20,000 |
| CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS | $20,000 |
| GIVING THE BASICS | $15,000 |
| CARE BEYOND THE BOULEVARD | $15,000 |
| MORNING GLORY MINISTRIES CATHEDRAL OF IMMACULATE CONCEPTION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 39% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
38 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HTHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK2× · 2023–2024 · $80k · revenue +2%
- TCThe Children's Mercy Hospital2× · 2023–2024 · $65k · revenue +15%
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +62%
Funded once
- VVARIOUSone grant, 2021 · $62k
- TBTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INCone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +11%
- HSHumane Society of Greater Kansas Cityone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.
Kansas legal services is devoted to helping low income kansans meet their basic needs through the provision of important legal and mediation services.
Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.
Our mission is to create an environment where all citizens can live safely and have access to real opportunities.
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
The mission of kc care health center is to promote health and wellness by providing quality care, access, research and education to the underserved and all people in our community.
Leading the way in creating a compassionate, safe community for pets and people through progressive lifesaving programs and services, community resources, and educational opportunities.
Kacap supports community action agencies and other human services organizations in thier local, state and national efforts to end poverty.
Offer hope to build a better tomorrow through mental health services.
KC Tenants organizes to ensure that everyone in Kansas City has a safe, accessible, and truly affordable home.
Leading the way to the best kc region by convening innovative leaders, collaborating with like-minded organizations, advocating for positive change, and helping small businesses grow.
Addressing the causes and effects of poverty by uniting staff, individuals, families, and community partners to provide quality, comprehensive services through compassionate, respectful relationships.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Great Plains and the most unlike its peers is Renew Kc Neighborhoods. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 24. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL GOODS PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS ↗
- Who funds OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CITY GIRLS PREPARATORY ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds GIVING THE BASICS INC ↗
- Who funds CARE BEYOND THE BOULEVARD INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION BBQ RELIEF ↗
- Who funds WATERORG ↗
- Who funds VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds KANBE'S MARKETS ↗
- Who funds GREAT JOBS KC INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS INC ↗
- Who funds THE ELIE WIESEL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds CHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds DAYSTAR COUNSELING MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE PROSPECT KC ↗
- Who funds Uzazi Village ↗
- Who funds SHEFFIELD PLACE ↗
- Who funds HIGH ASPIRATIONS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Bresky Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · The H & R Block Foundation · Menorah Heritage Foundation · The Kansas City Royals Foundation · Seaboard Foundation · Health Forward Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · Servant Foundation · The Curry Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Wally Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
- Choate Rosemary Hall Foundation Incorporated — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Wally Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Wally Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.