· Private foundation
Hunt Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k41 grants · $95k
- $10k–50k25 grants · $553k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $580k
- $250k+1 grant · $738k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES | $738,406 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER KANSAS CITY | $121,161 |
| CITY YEAR INC | $100,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS | $77,810 |
| CHIEFS AMBASSADORS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $74,824 |
| HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK | $55,000 |
| JACKSON COUNTY CASA | $51,545 |
| ATHLETES IN ACTION SPORTS COMPLEX AND RETREAT CENTER INC | $50,000 |
| YMCA FOUNDATION OF MID-AMERICA | $50,000 |
| NEWHOUSE INC | $45,000 |
| KANSAS CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $42,000 |
| VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT | $35,535 |
| FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION | $35,010 |
| PETE'S GARDEN INC | $30,750 |
| EARLYSTART | $25,600 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $609k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +3% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
98 repeat relationships — 54 still active in FY2025, 44 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $148k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PMPEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE4× · 2021–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +65%
CITY YEAR INC5× · 2021–2025 · $398k · revenue +4%- CACHIEFS AMBASSADORS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION5× · 2021–2025 · $331k · revenue ×13 · 62% of their budget
Funded once
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF KS HEALTH SYSTEMone grant, 2021 · $373k
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEMone grant, 2022 · $287k
- FOFOLDS OF HONOR KANSAS CITY INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $72k · revenue +28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.
Leading the way to the best kc region by convening innovative leaders, collaborating with like-minded organizations, advocating for positive change, and helping small businesses grow.
To protect and promote the well-being of children by providing ongoing support of the charitable mission of the kansas children's service league.
Focus and organize community support for the sporting events the city enjoys and facilitate the acquisition of additional sporting events.
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
Kansas legal services is devoted to helping low income kansans meet their basic needs through the provision of important legal and mediation services.
Kacap supports community action agencies and other human services organizations in thier local, state and national efforts to end poverty.
Front Porch Alliance works together with residents of Kansas City, Missouris eastside and urban core to meet their changing needs at home and in school.
To provide kansas city youth with the opportunity to develop into high character, productive members of society and learn the skills of baseball.
Leading the way in creating a compassionate, safe community for pets and people through progressive lifesaving programs and services, community resources, and educational opportunities.
Kids Win Missouri furthers child well-being by advancing the health, education, safety and development of Missouri children and their families, especially those who are at-risk because of poverty, abuse, neglect, racial inequities or other…
Addressing the causes and effects of poverty by uniting staff, individuals, families, and community partners to provide quality, comprehensive services through compassionate, respectful relationships.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Brothers Big Sisters Kansas City and the most unlike its peers is The Signatry Corporation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
100 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 100 of the 308 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
- Who funds CHIEFS AMBASSADORS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION COUNTERING SEXUAL ASSAULT ↗
- Who funds United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONES OF CARE ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY ↗
- Who funds 15 AND THE MAHOMIES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Greater Kansas City Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds YMCA FOUNDATION OF MID-AMERICA ↗
- Who funds DERRICK THOMAS NEIL SMITH THIRD AND ↗
- Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters Kansas City ↗
- Who funds JACKSON COUNTY CASA ↗
- Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR KANSAS CITY INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC ↗
- Who funds PETES GARDEN ↗
- Who funds NEWHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TURN THE PAGE KC INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED INNER CITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOPE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE PHOENIX FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds FOOTPRINTS INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION SHOWER ↗
- Who funds POLICE FOUNDATION OF KANSAS CITY ↗
- Who funds Mothers Refuge ↗
- Who funds CHILD PROTECTION CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Hallmark Corporate Foundation · The Kansas City Royals Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund · Health Forward Foundation · William T Kemper Foundation Commerce Bank Trustee · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hunt Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Uncornered Inc — 24% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Pet Alliance of Greater Orlando Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hunt Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Hunt Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.