Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Michigan · Public charity

Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan

The Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan strives to improve the quality of life for all people affected by hemophilia, von Willebrand disease, other coagulation disorders, and related complications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
18
Itemized grants FY2024
18
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$929k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$46,155
Largest grant, FY2024
$98,325
Organizations funded a year
17 to 18
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
3
Total assets, FY2024
$4.4M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving18$929k0%
FY202318$840k0%
FY202218$862k6%
FY202118$841k11%
FY202017$856k6%
FY201917$840k0%
FY201817$793k0%
FY201717$839kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$6.8M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Michigan State University$894,5349n/a
University Pediatricians$551,72090%
Regents of the University of Michigan$464,5869n/a
Ohio State University Research Foundation$421,391926%
Indiana Hemophilia & Thrombosis Center Inc$414,17390%
Legacy Chm$389,749520%
Munson Medical Center$374,69890%
Henry Ford Health System$324,86790%
Nationwide Childrens Hospital Inc$323,0649n/a
The Toledo Hospital$316,93090%
Show all 21 grantees
All grantees of Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Michigan State University$894,5349n/a
University Pediatricians$551,72090%
Regents of the University of Michigan$464,5869n/a
Ohio State University Research Foundation$421,391926%
Indiana Hemophilia & Thrombosis Center Inc$414,17390%
Legacy Chm$389,749520%
Munson Medical Center$374,69890%
Henry Ford Health System$324,86790%
Nationwide Childrens Hospital Inc$323,0649n/a
The Toledo Hospital$316,93090%
Dayton Children's Hospital$301,81490%
Hurley Medical Center$291,0009n/a
Corewell Health Foundation West Michigan$286,93590%
University of Cincinnati$276,6789n/a
Karmanos Cancer Institute$261,0469n/a
University Hospitals Health System Inc$192,7586n/a
Bronson Methodist Hospital$159,47150%
Children's Hospital Medical Center$158,04540%
Akron Children's Hospital Foundation$153,61550%
West Michigan Cancer Center$138,81740%
Case Western Reserve University$103,25030%

Where it is load-bearing

Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 14 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity Pediatricians: $551,720 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetOhio State University Research Foundation: $421,391 over 9y, 26% of budgetIndiana Hemophilia & Thrombosis Center Inc: $414,173 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetLegacy Chm: $389,749 over 5y, 20% of budgetMunson Medical Center: $374,698 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHenry Ford Health System: $324,867 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Toledo Hospital: $316,930 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDayton Children's Hospital: $301,814 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCorewell Health Foundation West Michigan: $286,935 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBronson Methodist Hospital: $159,471 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Medical Center: $158,045 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAkron Children's Hospital Foundation: $153,615 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWest Michigan Cancer Center: $138,817 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCase Western Reserve University: $103,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 14.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Thrombosis a…Cystic Fibrosis Found…Fidelity Investments …
American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network IncNC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network Inc · Cystic Fibrosis Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan with peer funders

About Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan

How much does Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan give?
Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan reported 18 itemized grants totaling $928,938, out of $1,108,294 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 17 and 18 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (100%).
Who are Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Michigan State University ($895k), University Pediatricians ($552k), Regents of the University of Michigan ($465k).
Does Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network Inc, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan based?
Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan is based in MI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $978k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home