Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sam and Esther Friedman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

52% of Sam and Esther Friedman Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Jewish Federation Of Cleveland, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Sam and Esther Friedman Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $95k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
21
11
22
9
23
7
24
6
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Health$224kPhilanthropy$69kAnimals$63kEducation$17kPublic Safety & Disaster$14kArts & Culture$14kFood & Nutrition$12kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN$30,000
CLEVELAND SIGHT CENTER$15,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND$15,000
GEAUGA HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
CASE ALUMNI FOUNDATION$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$5,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$3,000
CLEVELAND FOOD BANK$3,000
CLEVELAND POPS ORCHESTRA$2,500
CLEVELAND SCHOOL OF ARTS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE GATHERING PLACE: $10k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $10k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $10k → 17%CLEVELAND SIGHT CENTER: $15k → 17%CLEVELAND SIGHT CENTER: $15k → 17%CLEVELAND SIGHT CENTER: $15k → 17%CLEVELAND SIGHT CENTER: $15k → 17%CLEVELAND SIGHT CENTER: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$340k · 12 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$340k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+20%

Still filing today

83%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyHealthFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN
    4× · 2021–2024 · $100k · revenue +39%
  • GC
    GEAUGA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +90%
  • TG
    THE GATHERING PLACE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $30k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • GF
    GATES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue +20%
  • CM
    CLEVELAND MAIDAN ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +3%
  • VG
    VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +31%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Lukes Foundation of Cleveland Ohio
Health
2
The Cleveland Foundation

Enhance the lives of all residents of greater cleveland, now and for generations to come, by working together with our donors to build community endowment, address needs through grantmaking, and provide leadership on key community issues.

Philanthropy
3
Cleveland Medical Library Association
Education
4
The Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati
Philanthropy
5
Cleveland-Cliffs Foundation
6
Hebrew Academy of Cleveland

The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…

7
Hope for Cleveland's Children
8
Cleveland Museum of Art

The mission of the cleveland museum of art (cma) is to fulfill its dual roles as one of the world's most distinguished comprehensive art museums and as one of northeastern ohio's principal civic and cultural institutions. the museum,…

Arts & Culture
9
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
10
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Group Return

Caring for life, researching for health and educating those who serve.

Health
11
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Caring for life, researching for health and educating those who serve.

Health
12
The Laura and Alvin Siegal College of Judaic Studies Educational Foundation

To carry out the charitable, educational, and religious purposes of the jewish federation of cleveland by promoting high quality jewish life-long learning opportunities regarding the study of judaism spiritually, historically, culturally,…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cleveland Society for the Blind and the most unlike its peers is Gates Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN — $100,000 · OtherACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDRENAMERICAN RED CROSS — $14,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE — $5,000 · Other+5 more — $9,500 · Other+5 moreCLEVELAND SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND — $70,000 · Human ServicesCLEVELAND SOCIETY FOR THE B…THE GATHERING PLACE — $30,000 · Human ServicesTHE GATHERING PLACEJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND — $65,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF CL…CASE ALUMNI FOUNDATION — $17,000 · PhilanthropyCASE ALUMNI FOUNDATIONGATES FOUNDATION — $4,000 · PhilanthropyGEAUGA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $50,000 · AnimalsGEAUGA COUNTY H…SAINT FRANCIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $7,500 · AnimalsSAINT FRANCIS A…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $23,500 · HealthGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $12,000 · Food & NutritionCLEVELAND POPS ORCHESTRA — $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$128,500Human Services$100,000Philanthropy$86,000Animals$57,500Health$23,500Food & Nutrition$12,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN — $100,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCLEVELAND SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND — $70,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND — $65,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEAUGA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $50,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GATHERING PLACE — $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $23,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCASE ALUMNI FOUNDATION — $17,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND POPS ORCHESTRA — $10,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $7,500 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetGATES FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND MAIDAN ASSOCIATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Swagelok FoundationOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Swagelok Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sam and Esther Friedman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sam and Esther Friedman Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sam and Esther Friedman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph