Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Rosenfeld Rumford Steckler Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$288k
Granted FY2025still arriving
79
Grants FY2025still arriving
17
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0172% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2025.

Arts & Culture$326kEducation$233kInternational$184kHealth$140kFood & Nutrition$52kHuman Services$45kCrime & Legal$30kPhilanthropy$28kCivil Rights$15kOther$464k
02FY2025 · 79 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k72 grants · $196k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $93k
$2,100
Median grant
17
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEVINE SCHOOL OF MUSIC$20,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$15,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$15,000
AVALON FOUNDATION$12,500
SMITHSONIAN AMERICAN ART MUSEUM$10,000
HAYSTACK MOUNTAIN SCHOOL OF CRAFTS$10,000
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$10,000
CRITCHLOW ADKINS CHILDREN'S CENTERS$8,040
A WIDER CIRCLE$7,500
WOMEN AND GIRLS FUND$7,500
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$6,500
MARTHA'S TABLE$6,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$6,000
ACADEMY ART MUSEUM$5,000
MERCY SHIPS$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS: $1k → 16%TRUSTAR YOUTH FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%GUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS: $1k → 16%GUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS: $1k → 16%TALBOT HOSPICE: $5k → 10%TALBOT HOSPICE: $5k → 10%TALBOT HOSPICE: $750 → 10%TALBOT HOSPICE: $650 → 10%HOUSE OF MERCY: $500 → 14%TALBOT COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: $500 → 10%HOUSE OF MERCY: $500 → 14%HOUSE OF MERCY: $500 → 14%HOUSE OF MERCY: $500 → 14%HOUSE OF MERCY: $500 → 14%HOUSE OF MERCY: $500 → 14%HOUSE OF MERCY: $500 → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $5k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $5k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $2k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $2k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $2k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $2k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $1k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
IA
PA
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 97 repeat orgs$117k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

97 repeat relationships — 74 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

97
36

Total granted

$1.4M
$96k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
0%

Still filing today

68%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureInternationalHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LM
    LEVINE MUSIC INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $176k · revenue +17%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $56k · revenue +79%
  • AF
    AVALON FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $53k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • GF
    GATES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +18%
  • SA
    SMITHSONIAN ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • WD
    WASHINGTON DC POLICE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -52%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
8
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
9
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
10
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
11
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
12
University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evidence Action and the most unlike its peers is House of Mercy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCommunity Arts CentersFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Animal Rescue and ShelterPolicy Research and AdvocacyMilitary Veterans SupportLocal History MuseumsYouth Sports ProgramsCommunity FoundationsUnited Way AffiliatesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Jewish Community Organizati…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Senior Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Food Banks and PantriesIndependent K-12 SchoolsHealth Access Advocacy and …Volunteer Fire & Ems Servic…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%38%35–55yr16%32%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/99
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,466

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

94 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 94 of the 140 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
93/94
Grantees still filing
59/94
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOME INC — $42,750 · OtherSOME INCWASHINGTON HEBREW CONGREGATION — $25,000 · OtherSIDWELL FRIENDS SCHOOL — $23,000 · OtherA G BELL — $21,000 · OtherWOMEN AND GIRLS FUND — $21,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $19,000 · OtherSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $19,500 · Other+68 more — $365,100 · Other+68 moreLEVINE MUSIC INC — $176,000 · Arts & CultureLEVINE MUSIC INCAVALON FOUNDATION INC — $53,000 · Arts & CultureAVALON FOUNDATION INCSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $50,000 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTIONOXFORD COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $16,390 · Arts & Culture+11 more — $30,160 · Arts & Culture+11 moreHaystack Mountain School of Crafts — $90,500 · EducationHaystack Mountain…A WIDER CIRCLE INC — $40,000 · EducationA WIDER CIRCLE IN…THE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC — $14,500 · EducationTHE NEWS LITERACY…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationFlorida Agricultural & Mechanical Univ Foundation Inc — $8,750 · Education+12 more — $58,750 · Education+12 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $55,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $45,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL…WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL — $17,500 · InternationalWOMEN FOR WOM…Mercy Ships International — $17,000 · InternationalMercy Ships I…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $10,500 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIE…HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL — $10,000 · InternationalHELEN KELLER …FEED THE CHILDREN INC — $8,000 · InternationalEVIDENCE ACTION — $7,500 · International+3 more — $12,500 · International+3 moreCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $52,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S…SUBURBAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $27,000 · HealthSUBURBAN H…BETHESDA-CHEVY CHASE RESCUE SQUAD INC — $20,000 · HealthBETHESDA-C…THE BLUE HILL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL NORTHERN LIGHT BLUE HILL HOSPITAL — $12,500 · HealthTHE BLUE H…CHILDREN'S NATIONAL — $7,000 · HealthParkinson Research Foundation Inc — $6,000 · HealthThe Fistula Foundation — $5,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $5,000 · Health+2 more — $5,000 · HealthMARTHA'S TABLE INC — $34,500 · Food & NutritionFeeding America — $7,000 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $6,000 · Food & NutritionBREAD FOR THE CITY INC — $4,000 · Food & NutritionMIRIAM'S KITCHEN — $19,000 · Human ServicesTALBOT HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC — $11,400 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION — $7,000 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF MERCY — $3,500 · Human ServicesGUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS INC — $3,000 · Human Services+2 more — $1,500 · Human Services
Other$536,350Arts & Culture$325,550Education$232,500International$184,000Health$139,500Food & Nutrition$51,500Human Services$45,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLEVINE MUSIC INC — $176,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetHaystack Mountain School of Crafts — $90,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $55,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAVALON FOUNDATION INC — $53,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $52,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $45,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOME INC — $42,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetA WIDER CIRCLE INC — $40,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC — $34,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSUBURBAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $27,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBETHESDA-CHEVY CHASE RESCUE SQUAD INC — $20,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $19,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMIRIAM'S KITCHEN — $19,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL — $17,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRosemount Center — $17,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMercy Ships International — $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOXFORD COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $16,390 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetTHE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC — $14,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBETHESDA FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $14,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH — $13,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BLUE HILL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL NORTHERN LIGHT BLUE HILL HOSPITAL — $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND — $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $12,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTALBOT HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC — $11,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $10,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL — $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGATES FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON DC POLICE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFlorida Agricultural & Mechanical Univ Foundation Inc — $8,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEVIDENCE ACTION — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC — $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEED FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America — $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S NATIONAL — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOR ALL SEASONS INC — $6,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFISK UNIVERSITY — $6,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSpelman College — $6,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTuskegee University — $6,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA — $6,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAMPTON UNIVERSITY — $6,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetParkinson Research Foundation Inc — $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWATERSHED CENTER FOR THE CERAMIC ARTS — $6,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEVINE MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds Haystack Mountain School of Crafts ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds AVALON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds A WIDER CIRCLE INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds SUBURBAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BETHESDA-CHEVY CHASE RESCUE SQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MIRIAM'S KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Rosemount Center ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds OXFORD COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds BETHESDA FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF RUTH ↗
  • Who funds THE BLUE HILL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL NORTHERN LIGHT BLUE HILL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEAR FUND ↗
  • Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds TALBOT HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Llandaff Family T…Greater Washington Co…Alan M & Mildred S Ra…Clark Charitable Foun…Mid Shore Community F…Watson Stone Family F…Dock Street FoundationGrayce B Kerr Fund IncThe Seip Family Found…Ruth and Robert St Jo…T & M Mitchell Fdn Di…Clark-Winchcole Found…
The Llandaff Family TrustMD28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Llandaff Family Trust · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Alan M & Mildred S Ravenal Foundation · Clark Charitable Foundation Inc Dba a James & Alice B Clark Foundation · Mid Shore Community Foundation Inc · Watson Stone Family Foundation Inc · Dock Street Foundation · Grayce B Kerr Fund Inc · The Seip Family Foundation Limited Eevercore Trust CO C/O Ashley Ferriello · Ruth and Robert St John Foundation Inc · T & M Mitchell Fdn Dima-Blrk · Clark-Winchcole Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Rosenfeld Rumford Steckler Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Eastern Shore Land Conservancy Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • For All Seasons Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Edward Waters University Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Florida Memorial University Inc — 11% of income from government
  • A Wider Circle Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Bethune-Cookman University — 6% of income from government
  • Avalon Foundation Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Academy Art Museum Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 140 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines