Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Carole Landis Foundation for Social Action

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2021
10
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$20k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Carole Landis Foundation for Social Action’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Philadelphia Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Carole Landis Foundation for Social Action named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $44k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
17
5
18
4
19
5
20
6
21
4
22
4
23
4
24
0
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$436kEducation$91kFood & Nutrition$42kCivil Rights$38kHuman Services$36kHealth$20kRecreation & Sports$17kArts & Culture$11kOther$0
02FY2021 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k9 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$4,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW$20,000
LUTHERAN SETTLEMENT HOUSE$5,000
HOLE IN THE WALL GANG CAMP$5,000
ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE OF EASTERNPA$5,000
TRELLIS FOR TOMORROW$4,000
JFCS$3,000
GERSHMAN PHILA JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL$1,000
CITY TEAM CHESTER$462
SUNDAY BREAKFAST RESCUE MISSION$261
Individual grant recipient$206
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JFCS: $3k → 22%CENTER IN THE PARK: $3k → 22%SUNDAY BREAKFAST RESCUE MISSION: $261 → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$278k · 13 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2021, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$278k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+49%

Still filing today

46%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHealthRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VU
    VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $91k · revenue +50%
  • TF
    TRELLIS FOR TOMORROW
    6× · 2019–2024 · $30k · revenue +162%
  • HI
    HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $17k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • WW
    WORTHWHILE WEAR INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +225%
  • GF
    GATES FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +49%
  • MF
    MARCH FOR OUR LIVES ACTION FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $300 · revenue -81%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
2
Urban League of Greater Philadelphia

The mission of the urban league is to empower disadvantaged, underresourced and marginalized communities to secure economic self-reliance, parity, power and civil rights.

3
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
4
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
5
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
6
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
7
Public Health Institute

Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.

Health
8
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
9
Pathways to Housing - Pa

Pathways to housing pa empowers people with disabilities to improve their housing stability, achieve better health, and reclaim their lives.

Housing & Shelter
10
Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Corporation

Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.

Community Improvement
11
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

12
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Philadelphia Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Gates Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $405,380 · PhilanthropyTHE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATIONTRELLIS FOR TOMORROW — $30,050 · PhilanthropyTRELLIS FOR TOMORROW+1 more — $500 · PhilanthropyANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE OF EASTERNPA — $38,000 · OtherANTI DEFAMATION LEA…JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILA — $30,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION O…LUTHERAN SETTLEMENT HOUSE — $24,800 · OtherLUTHERAN SETTLEMENT…GERSHWYN Y JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL — $6,000 · OtherFEMALE HEBREW BENEVOLENT SOCIETY — $5,000 · OtherGERSHMAN PHILA JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL — $5,000 · OtherCITYTEAM MINISTRIES — $4,175 · Other+7 more — $9,967 · Other+7 moreVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $90,500 · EducationVILLANOVA UNIV…+1 more — $200 · EducationCONGRESO DE LATINOS UNIDOS INC — $15,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD KEYSTONE — $5,000 · HealthHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC — $17,000 · Recreation & SportsPhilabundance — $11,800 · Food & NutritionTHE ATTIC YOUTH CENTER — $7,000 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$435,930Other$122,942Education$90,700Health$20,000Recreation & Sports$17,000Food & Nutrition$11,800Youth Development$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $90,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRELLIS FOR TOMORROW — $30,050 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC — $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCONGRESO DE LATINOS UNIDOS INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPhilabundance — $11,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ATTIC YOUTH CENTER — $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD KEYSTONE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITYTEAM MINISTRIES — $4,175 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER IN THE PARK — $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWORTHWHILE WEAR INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGATES FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH FOR OUR LIVES ACTION FUND — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNDAY BREAKFAST RESCUE MISSION — $261 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBroward Education Foundation Inc — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds TRELLIS FOR TOMORROW
  • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC
  • Who funds CONGRESO DE LATINOS UNIDOS INC
  • Who funds Philabundance
  • Who funds THE ATTIC YOUTH CENTER
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD KEYSTONE
  • Who funds CITYTEAM MINISTRIES
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds CENTER IN THE PARK
  • Who funds WORTHWHILE WEAR INC
  • Who funds GATES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MARCH FOR OUR LIVES ACTION FUND
  • Who funds SUNDAY BREAKFAST RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds Broward Education Foundation Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The William Penn Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Carole Landis Foundation for Social Action funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Carole Landis Foundation for Social Action?

    Find your warmest path to Carole Landis Foundation for Social Action through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph