· Private foundation
The Huisking Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k118 grants · $579k
- $10k–50k56 grants · $831k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $437k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA | $87,000 |
| GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH | $75,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS - NJ CHAPTER | $60,000 |
| ST JUDE'S CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | $60,000 |
| ASOLO REPERTORY THEATRE | $55,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS - NJ CHAPTER | $50,000 |
| WOODS SERVICES FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| SARASOTA ORCHESTRA | $35,000 |
| LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR | $30,000 |
| MINISTRY OF CARING | $30,000 |
| CLATSOP COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC | $30,000 |
| NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY | $25,000 |
| MACLAY SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| OUR LADY OF ASSUMPTION CHURCH | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $479k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
348 repeat relationships — 157 still active in FY2025, 191 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $119k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MFMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INC9× · 2017–2025 · $724k · revenue +69%
- ATASOLO THEATRE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $560k · revenue +25%
- ABALFRED B MACLAY JR DAY SCHOOL8× · 2017–2025 · $235k · revenue +76%
Funded once
- CHCLATSOP HISTORICAL SOCIETY INCone grant, 2018 · $25k
- LPLE PETIT THEATREone grant, 2022 · $15k
- RMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF CT MAone grant, 2021 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gates Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
263 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 263 of the 566 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ASOLO THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds Woods Services Foundation ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds THE MINISTRY OF CARING INC ↗
- Who funds ALFRED B MACLAY JR DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CLATSOP COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR INC ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds A LEG TO STAND ON INC ↗
- Who funds RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC ↗
- Who funds Easter Seals Southwest Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BRIDGE TRUST ↗
- Who funds NORTHSIDE HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds The Danbury Hospital ↗
- Who funds SARASOTA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE CENTER FOR HORTICULTURE INC ↗
- Who funds SOARING EAGLE ↗
- Who funds Terrific New Theatre Inc ↗
- Who funds Emory University ↗
- Who funds THE MUSIC SCHOOL OF DELAWARE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN FIRST INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER OF ST PAUL'S ↗
- Who funds The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame ↗
- Who funds THOMAS MORE CENTER FOR PREACHING IN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: Laffey-McHugh Foundation · Delaware Community Foundation Inc · Mike and Gillian Goodrich Foundation · Longwood Foundation Inc · Welfare Foundation Inc · The Anthony & Catherine Fusco Foundation · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Crestlea Foundation Inc · Chichester Dupont Foundation Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · William G and Marie Selby Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Huisking Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Reading Assist Institute — 99% of income from government
- Family Counseling Center of St Paul's — 41% of income from government
- Health Resources in Action Inc — 39% of income from government
- Integrated Refugee and Immigrant Services — 37% of income from government
- The Ministry of Caring Inc — 30% of income from government
- Favorhouse of Northwest Florida Inc — 25% of income from government
- Easter Seals Southwest Florida Inc — 12% of income from government
- The Lord's Place Inc — 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- The Music School of Delaware Inc — 9% of income from government
- Manna Food Bank Inc — 8% of income from government
- Delaware Art Museum Inc — 8% of income from government
- Delaware Breast Cancer Coalition Inc — 7% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Gaylord Hospital Inc — 6% of income from government
- The Children's Home Society of Florida — 6% of income from government
- Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
- Alachua Conservation Trust Inc — 5% of income from government
- Little Sisters of the Poor Inc — 5% of income from government
- Delaware Center for Horticulture Inc — 4% of income from government
- The Delaware Contemporary Arts Inc Arts Inc — 2% of income from government
- Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc — 2% of income from government
- Bergen Performing Arts Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Westport Country Playhouse Inc — 2% of income from government
- Children's Aid and Family Services Inc — 1% of income from government
- Georgian Court University — 1% of income from government
- Simmons University — 1% of income from government
- Hermitage Artist Retreat Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Danbury Hospital — 1% of income from government
- Yale New Haven Hospital — 0% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Fairfield Theatre Company Inc — 0% of income from government
- New Jersey Performing Arts Center Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pensacola Habitat for Humanity Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
- South Florida Pbs Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Huisking Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Huisking Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.