· Public charity
The Whitehorse Foundation
Type I supporting organization under irc section 509(a)(3) to seattle foundation.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 22 grants below total $2,342,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,442,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $100,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
- $50k–250k19 grants · $1.9M
- $250k+1 grant · $440k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY | $440,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT | $212,500 |
| VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WESTERN WASHINGTON | $175,000 |
| PROJECT GIRL MENTORING PROGRAM | $150,000 |
| MILLENNIA MINISTRIES | $125,000 |
| CHILDSTRIVE | $125,000 |
| CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES | $120,000 |
| COCOON HOUSE | $100,000 |
| WONDERLAND CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES | $100,000 |
| THE INTERFAITH ASSOCIATION OF NORTHWEST WASHINGTON | $95,000 |
| LINC NW | $90,000 |
| WASHINGTON STATE FAMILY AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT TRUST | $90,000 |
| TAKE THE NEXT STEP | $75,000 |
| HOUSING HOPE | $75,000 |
| YWCA OF SEATTLE-KING-SNOHOMISH COUNTY | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
27 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $245k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VOVolunteers of America Western Washington7× · 2017–2023 · $948k · revenue +332%
- FFFOUNDATION FOR EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT7× · 2018–2024 · $945k · revenue +49%
- CHCOCOON HOUSE8× · 2017–2024 · $800k · revenue +51%
Funded once
- PHPIONEER HUMAN SERVICES INCone grant, 2022 · $80k · revenue +19%
WASHINGTON ALLIANCE FOR BETTER SCHOOLSgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +92%- CHCHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +71%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Family-Driven Community of Support for caregivers of children with a range of behavioral health needs.
Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…
Csnw's mission is to provide high quality, integrated mental health, addictions and housing services, focusing on individual strengths and recovery. our vision is a healthy community. we lead the way by assuring access to mental health,…
United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.
To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.
SWYFS partners with youth and families to transform their futures.
Housing Counseling Services
CARE. Commitment to improving quality of life. Advocacy for mental health and overall well-being. Response to community needs. Effective treatment with measurable outcomes.
Chelan Valley Hope is a gross-roots local social services agency 'hub' for compassionate connections and resources since 2009. We empower people to improve their own lives by giving them a hand up; not just a hand-out. We do this by…
Northwest youth services collaborates with at-risk, runaway, and homeless youth to foster self-reliance. the organization's goal is to keep youth safe, heal family relationships, and reconnect youth to the community. the organization…
Cascade women's health provides consultations on pregnancy options, limited medical services, and education to individuals at risk for, or because of, unplanned pregnancies.
Project Access Northwest provides low-income families access to medical, dental and Behavioral Health care so they can live a healthier and more productive life.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Domestic Violence Services of Snohomish and the most unlike its peers is Bridge Receiving Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Community Foundation of Snohomish County ↗
- Who funds Volunteers of America Western Washington ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT ↗
- Who funds COCOON HOUSE ↗
- Who funds HOUSING HOPE ↗
- Who funds CHILDSTRIVE ↗
- Who funds Lutheran Community Services Northwest ↗
- Who funds TAKE THE NEXT STEP ↗
- Who funds Washington State Family And Community Engagement Trust ↗
- Who funds PROJECT GIRL MENTORING PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds MILLENNIA MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Community Resources Foundation ↗
- Who funds COMPASS HEALTH ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SEATTLE-KING COUNTY-SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds LINC NW ↗
- Who funds THE INTERFAITH ASSOCIATION OF NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds WONDERLAND CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NORTH COUNTIES' FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH ↗
- Who funds Center for Human Services ↗
- Who funds Second Chance Outreach Hope for Homies ↗
- Who funds CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HOPEWORKS SOCIAL ENTERPRISES ↗
- Who funds MERCY HOUSING NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds NORTHSHORE YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds PIONEER HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SHERWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON ALLIANCE FOR BETTER SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds PERINATAL SUPPORT WASHINGTON ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Snohomish County · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · United Way of Snohomish County · The Norcliffe Foundation · Medina Foundation · School's Out Washington · Evertrust Foundation · North Sound Accountable Community of Health · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · The Employee Community Foundation Optum Washington
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Whitehorse Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Whitehorse Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Whitehorse Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.