Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Washington

To provide high-quality, affordable health care services to improve the health of our members and the communities we serve.

$13M
Granted FY2024still arriving
69
Grants FY2024still arriving
24
States reached
$3.7M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$63MScience & Tech$41MEducation$8.6MEnvironment$4.3MHuman Services$2.8MYouth Development$2.7MPhilanthropy$2.4MCommunity Improvement$2.0MOther$0
02FY2024 · 69 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k28 grants · $718k
  • $50k–250k28 grants · $3.2M
  • $250k+9 grants · $8.5M
$55,063
Median grant
24
States reached
$3.2B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Washington$3,716,508
Regents Of The University Of California$1,163,537
Seattle Childrens Hospital$1,136,491
Indiana University$658,983
Sutter West Bay Hospitals$496,923
Institute For Family Health$422,352
Northeastern University$313,480
Seiu Healthcare 1199nw$283,795
Project Access Northwest$280,000
Nat'l Alliance on Medical Illness of WA$214,901
Rand Corporation$213,162
Healthpartners Institute$198,111
University Of Pennsylvania$160,891
Apic Spokane$158,136
Local Initiatives Support Corp$150,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HATHAWAY SYCAMORES CHILD AND FAMILY SVCS: $48k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $99k → 9%Community Action of Skagit County: $8k → 11%HATHAWAY-SYCAMORES CHILD AND FAMILY: $11k → 14%TIDES CENTER: $195k → 10%SENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $10k → 9%Asian Counseling And Referral Service: $181k → 9%Our Sisters House: $162k → 9%Our Sisters House: $138k → 9%El Centro De La Raza: $30k → 9%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INCORPORATED: $25k → 9%American Indian Community Center: $7k → 12%CHILD CARE RESOURCES: $10k → 9%ASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE: $8k → 9%Tacoma Urban League: $50k → 9%Tacoma Urban League: $50k → 9%NAMI Washington: $10k → 9%NAMI WASHINGTON: $56k → 9%Hopelink: $28k → 9%Hopelink: $25k → 9%Silent Task Force: $150k → 9%YWCA OF SEATTLE KING COUNTY: $85k → 9%Sound Generations: $198k → 9%BYRD BARR PLACE: $20k → 9%Community Credit Lab: $100k → 9%COMMUNITY CREDIT LAB: $100k → 9%Nat'l Alliance on Medical Illness of WA: $215k → 9%Nami Washington: $202k → 9%Nami Washington: $195k → 9%NAMI WASHINGTON: $174k → 9%NAMI WASHINGTON: $72k → 9%Nami Washington: $30k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $10k → 9%Somali Health Board: $10k → 9%CHILDRENS ALLIANCE: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$120M · 167 repeat orgs$14M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

167 repeat relationships — 54 still active in FY2024, 113 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

167
150

Total granted

$120M
$13M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+31%

Still filing today

71%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7.5M · revenue +82%
  • HF
    HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5.3M · revenue +69%
  • THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND
    7× · 2017–2023 · $4.0M · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • KF
    KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2.9M · revenue +46%
  • MF
    MULTICARE FOUNDATIONSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2.0M · revenue +163%
  • SC
    SEATTLE CHILDREN'S THEATRE ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2017 · $628k · revenue +8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uw Physicians Network

To improve the health of the public.

Education
2
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—
3
North Olympic Healthcare Network

To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.

Health
4
Northwest Community Healthcare

NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE follows the mission of Endeavor Health. The mission of Endeavor Health is to "help everyone in our communities be their best." Central to this mission is a commitment to providing clinical programs and…

Health
5
Seattle Children's Healthcare System

Seattle children's healthcare system (schs) is engaged in activities relating to the provision of health care services to infants, children, and adolescents, delivering and improving the delivery and the quality of those services through…

Health
6
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
7
The Association of Chrmc and University Physicians

Children's university medical group (cumg) is the non-profit pediatric group practice established to support the academic, research and clinical missions of its corporate members, university of washington school of medicine (uwsom) and…

Health
8
One Community Health

Advance health and social justice for all members of our community.

—
9
Western Healthconnect

Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.

Health
10
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
11
Wenatchee Valley Hospital

We are dedicated to improving our patients' health by providing safe, high-quality care in a compassionate and cost-effective manner.

—
12
Northwest Community Hospital

NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL follows the mission of Endeavor Health (F/K/A NS-EE Holdings). The mission of Endeavor Health is to "help everyone in our communities be their best." Central to this mission is a commitment to providing…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Providence Inland Northwest Foundation and the most unlike its peers is DARE2BE Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsUnited Way AffiliatesPregnancy Support ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesYouth Mentoring ProgramsLocal Food System Organizat…Food Banks and PantriesYouth Sports ProgramsCommunity College Foundatio…Independent K-12 SchoolsAffordable Housing Developm…Immigrant Worker SupportMilitary Veterans SupportPolicy Research and AdvocacyChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community FoundationsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Community Arts CentersAddiction Recovery ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Health Access Advocacy and …Environmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%2%<5yr14%10%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr18%24%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr15%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%1%<5yr14%6%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr18%15%20–35yr13%35%35–55yr15%34%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%4/339
the rest of the field
12%
4,742/38,629

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

256 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 256 of the 340 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

15
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
49
Early backer (in before they grew)
248/256
Grantees still filing
181/256
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $28,864,647 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONIndiana University School of Medicine — $3,638,053 · OtherIndiana University School of MedicineREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVINE — $3,313,113 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS — $3,075,017 · Other+96 more — $28,304,187 · Other+96 moreSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $7,514,951 · HealthSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $5,318,097 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMGEISINGER CLINIC — $3,450,929 · HealthGEISINGER CLINICHEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE — $3,388,152 · HealthHEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTEKAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS — $2,913,861 · HealthKAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALSHARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE INC — $2,318,055 · HealthMULTICARE FOUNDATIONS — $2,000,000 · Health+44 more — $19,124,833 · Health+44 moreUniversity of Miami — $1,096,616 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $880,728 · EducationTHE WASHINGTON STEM CENTER — $880,375 · EducationSEATTLE CHILDREN'S THEATRE ASSOCIATION — $627,693 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC — $588,411 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $567,247 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $362,086 · EducationACE ACADEMY — $291,326 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $275,240 · Education+14 more — $1,713,389 · EducationTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $4,025,000 · EnvironmentFORTERRA NW — $204,538 · EnvironmentUNITED WAY OF PIERCE COUNTY — $1,005,000 · PhilanthropySEATTLE FOUNDATION — $654,500 · PhilanthropyKITSAP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $466,452 · PhilanthropyWASHINGTON ALLIANCE FOR BETTER SCHOOLS — $407,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY — $388,466 · PhilanthropyPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC — $250,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Spokane County — $175,000 · PhilanthropyNAMI WASHINGTON — $955,112 · Human ServicesMARY'S PLACE SEATTLE — $400,000 · Human ServicesOur Sisters House — $300,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY CREDIT LAB — $199,999 · Human ServicesSOUND GENERATIONS — $197,600 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER — $195,391 · Human ServicesASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE — $188,364 · Human ServicesThe Silent Task Force — $150,000 · Human ServicesTacoma Urban League — $100,150 · Human Services+4 more — $295,073 · Human ServicesSeattle Center Foundation — $1,244,868 · Arts & CultureAsia Pacific Cultural Center — $310,860 · Arts & CultureARTS IMPACT — $119,616 · Arts & CultureCarl Maxey Center — $104,999 · Arts & Culture
Other$67,195,017Health$46,028,878Education$7,283,111Environment$4,229,538Philanthropy$3,346,418Human Services$2,981,689Arts & Culture$1,780,343

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $7,514,951 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $5,318,097 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $4,025,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetGEISINGER CLINIC — $3,450,929 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE — $3,388,152 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetKAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS — $2,913,861 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE INC — $2,318,055 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALTARUM INSTITUTE — $1,544,228 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetProject Access Northwest — $1,455,000 over 7y, 29% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY HEALTH — $1,422,145 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $1,381,970 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSeattle Center Foundation — $1,244,868 over 5y, 20% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER — $1,134,139 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $1,096,616 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetESSENTIA INSTITUTE OF RURAL HEALTH — $1,083,472 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetOCHIN INC — $1,077,666 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetMULTICARE HEALTH SYSTEM — $1,031,898 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF PIERCE COUNTY — $1,005,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetCOMAGINE HEALTH — $967,635 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetNAMI WASHINGTON — $955,112 over 8y, 19% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $880,728 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WASHINGTON STEM CENTER — $880,375 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER — $828,464 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $821,678 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetALLIANCE FOR A HEALTHIER GENERATION INC — $797,408 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetSWEDISH HEALTH SERVICES — $735,721 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CARE — $714,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSEIU HEALTHCARE 1199NW MULTI-EMPLOYER TRAINING & EDUCATION FUND — $710,365 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetThe Rand Corporation — $676,159 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION — $654,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWashington School-Based Health Alliance — $642,100 over 7y, 95% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S THEATRE ASSOCIATION — $627,693 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetCommunity Health Association of Spokane — $605,480 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHEALTHPOINT — $605,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC — $588,411 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $567,247 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARSHFIELD CLINIC INC — $511,967 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWITHINREACH — $510,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetSUTTER BAY HOSPITALS — $496,923 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKITSAP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $466,452 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetSEATTLE ROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH — $442,203 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetGAPPS Global Alliance To Prevent Prematurity And Stillbirth — $428,696 over 3y, 39% of budgetWA THERAPY FUND FOUNDATION — $412,500 over 2y, 29% of budgetWASHINGTON ALLIANCE FOR BETTER SCHOOLS — $407,000 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $402,851 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMARY'S PLACE SEATTLE — $400,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSEATTLE PARKS FOUNDATION — $399,500 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY — $388,466 over 4y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds GEISINGER CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ↗
  • Who funds HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds MULTICARE FOUNDATIONS ↗
  • Who funds ALTARUM INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Project Access Northwest ↗
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Seattle Center Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds ESSENTIA INSTITUTE OF RURAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds OCHIN INC ↗
  • Who funds MULTICARE HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF PIERCE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds COMAGINE HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds NAMI WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds SUTTER MEDICAL CENTER OF SR AUXILIARY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds THE WASHINGTON STEM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR A HEALTHIER GENERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SWEDISH HEALTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Norcliffe Foundat…School's Out Washingt…United Way of King Co…Seattle FoundationPuget Sound Energy Fo…Inatai FoundationCredit Unions in the …Delta Dental of Washi…Gates FoundationThe Satterberg Founda…Greater Tacoma Commun…Medina Foundation
The Norcliffe FoundationWA87× affinity55 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Norcliffe Foundation · School's Out Washington · United Way of King County · Seattle Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Inatai Foundation · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · Delta Dental of Washington · Gates Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Greater Tacoma Community Foundation · Medina Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Washington funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Education Northwest — 44% of income from government
  • Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Inc — 37% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
  • Ochin Inc — 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
57report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 340 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home