· Community foundation
The Employee Community Foundation Optum Washington
The goal of the foundation is to provide ongoing philanthropic support to charitable organizations in western washington.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $47,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $161,865 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $114,365 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IMAGINE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM | $22,500 |
| CHRISTMAS HOUSE | $7,000 |
| LAHAI HEALTH | $6,000 |
| PROVIDENCE HOSPICE & HOME CARE FOUNDATION OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY | $6,000 |
| HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $175k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
28 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ICIMAGINE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM8× · 2018–2025 · $154k · revenue +64%
- HSHUMANE SOCIETY FOR TACOMA PIERCE COUNTY SOCIETY PREVENTION CRUELTY ANIMALS4× · 2017–2020 · $143k · revenue +58%
- ECEVERETT COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2023 · $92k · revenue +64%
Funded once
LITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTERone grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue +9%- WKWASHINGTON KIDS IN TRANSITIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +98%
- VCVILLAGE COMMUNITY SERVICESgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +69%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.
Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.
LCSNW partners with individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope. LCSNW provides a wide variety of social services in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and serves people of all ages, cultures and faiths.
Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Western Washington & Alaska supports families with seriously ill children by providing a caring home-away-from-home at the SEattle Ronald McDonald House and operating a house and a van service in…
To reflect the heart of God by feeding, sheltering, clothing, healing and empowering those in need. Programs include housing, a cafe and job training system, shelter resources, and more. Our core values are: compassion, respect, joy and…
We provide community members facing homlessness with chelter, resurces, and advoccy to create a strong and thriving widbey island.
To provide food, shelter, clothing and other services to people in need in our community.
To make known the gifts of people with developmental disabilities revealed through mutually transforming relationships. To engage in our diverse cultures, working together toward a more humane society. To foster community that is inspired…
Workforce snohomish invests government and private funding to continuously increase the global competitiveness and prosperity of our businesses and workforce, to fill current and emerging jobs, and to provide full employment. our…
Northwest youth services collaborates with at-risk, runaway, and homeless youth to foster self-reliance. the organization's goal is to keep youth safe, heal family relationships, and reconnect youth to the community. the organization…
Provide a safe, healing, and restorative community that empowers long-term transformation through human connection for those recovering from the trauma of homelessness, addictions, and mental health challenges.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Domestic Violence Services of Snohomish and the most unlike its peers is Arlington Kids Kloset. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IMAGINE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY FOR TACOMA PIERCE COUNTY SOCIETY PREVENTION CRUELTY ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds EVERETT COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SEATTLE-KING COUNTY-SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CLOTHES FOR KIDS ↗
- Who funds HOUSING HOPE ↗
- Who funds SENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HAND IN HAND ↗
- Who funds SAFE HARBOR FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds THE INTERFAITH ASSOCIATION OF NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds SHERWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds ARC OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds EVERETT RECOVERY CAFE ↗
- Who funds CAMP FIRE SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds LAHAI HEALTH ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HOPEWORKS SOCIAL ENTERPRISES ↗
- Who funds CHILDSTRIVE ↗
- Who funds COMPASS HEALTH ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES AND FRIENDS OF MISSING PERSONS & VIOLENT CRIME VICTIMS ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE HOSPICE & HOME CARE FOUNDATION SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CHRISTMAS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds STANWOOD-CAMANO FOOD BANK SERVICES ↗
- Who funds COCOON HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Citrine Health ↗
- Who funds LITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON KIDS IN TRANSITION ↗
- Who funds VILLAGE COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds ALL ABOARD OF AMERICA 1 ↗
- Who funds NORTHSHORE SENIOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds BETHANY OF THE NORTHWEST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH ↗
- Who funds Monroe Gospel Womens Mission ↗
- Who funds ARLINGTON KIDS KLOSET ↗
- Who funds PARENT TRUST FOR WASHINGTON CHILDREN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Snohomish County · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Evertrust Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Employees Community Fund of Boeing-Puget Sound · United Way of Snohomish County · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · The Whitehorse Foundation · North Sound Accountable Community of Health · Medina Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Employee Community Foundation Optum Washington funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Employee Community Foundation Optum Washington?
Find your warmest path to The Employee Community Foundation Optum Washington through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.