· Private foundation
The Richdale Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| STREET HOMELESS ANIMAL PROJECT | $4,000 |
| KINDRED SPIRITS | $4,000 |
| PILOTS TO THE RESCUE | $4,000 |
| ANIMAL PROTECTION OF NEW MEXICO INC | $3,000 |
| INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SHELTER | $3,000 |
| THE FOOD DEPOT | $3,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $3,000 |
| KITCHEN ANGELS | $3,000 |
| SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY | $3,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE US | $3,000 |
| CANCER SERVICES OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| MONASTERY OF CHRIST IN THE DESERT | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +73% since the first grant, against +53% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- APANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO8× · 2017–2024 · $22k · revenue +73%
- KAKITCHEN ANGELS INC7× · 2017–2024 · $22k · revenue +15%
- KSKINDRED SPIRITS ANIMAL SANCTUARY7× · 2017–2024 · $21k · revenue +122%
Funded once
- NNAACPone grant, 2020 · $5k
- ESEmpty Stocking Fund Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +39%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.
The purpose of argos, a shelter dog rescue is: to rescue animals from situations that are abusive, endangering, or neglectful. to rescue animals in danger of being euthanized in new mexico shelters/pounds. to provide necessary veterinary…
Saving animals from euthanasia, resulting in healthy pets being adopted.
To rescue and place pets in need of a second chance; working towards zero pet overpopulation by facilitating low-cost spay/neuter; and improving the lives of both companion animals and their owners through on-going education
Our mission is to be an innovative regional leader in responsible treatment of homeless dogs and cats, primarily through their rescue and placement in forever loving homes and by promoting spaying and neutering to control pet…
Line 4a - first accomplishment we operate a 25,000 square-foot thrift shop, located at 5341 menaul blvd. ne, which is filled with gently used and new items generously donated by our community. the vast offerings, which include clothing,…
Stray Hearts is a socially conscious shelter and adoption facility reuniting lost pets with their families and providing humane care and shelter for surrendered, lost, and homeless companion animals in Taos County, New Mexico.Our pledge:…
New mexico pets alive offers hope for homeless pets by meeting the challenge with creativity and 21st century solutions inspired by the past 10+ years of success of neighboring states achieving no - kill communities (saving all healthy and…
To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.
Nevada spca saves the lives of southern nevada's most vulnerable pets, inspires human companions to uphold the best possible care and increases the human-animal bond through adoption, foster and preventative care.
Prevent Cruelty to Cats and Dogs in Northern New Mexico Stop Unnecessary Euthanasia of Cats and Dogs in Northern New Mexico Reduce the Population of Homeless Cats and Dogs in Northern New Mexico
Ark-Valley Humane Society's (AVHS) Mission is ensuring the welfare of companion animals through compassion and care. AVHS operated an open-admission animal shelter for Chaffee County, Colorado.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Fe Animal Shelter and Humane Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds KITCHEN ANGELS INC ↗
- Who funds KINDRED SPIRITS ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
- Who funds CANCER SERVICES OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds LENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds VILLAGE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE NM INC ↗
- Who funds Empty Stocking Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds PILOTS TO THE RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SHELTER GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE OF THE WOOD RIVER VALLEY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · The Frost Foundation · Thornburg Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · C & I Roybal Charitable Foundation · Garfield Street Foundation · Slf Foundation · Eugene V and Clare E Thaw Charitable Trust · The Ark Foundation · Ella Gayle Hamlin Foundation Inc · The Abeles Foundation · Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Richdale Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.