· Private foundation
Andrea Waitt Carlton Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k40 grants · $136k
- $10k–50k41 grants · $938k
- $50k–250k19 grants · $1.7M
- $250k+1 grant · $262k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BELMONT UNIVERSITY | $262,000 |
| BELMONT UNIVERSITY | $203,569 |
| DUCKS UNLIMITED | $150,000 |
| PEARSON LAKES ART CENTER | $125,000 |
| THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION | $125,000 |
| NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION | $101,748 |
| OPERATION STAND DOWN | $101,748 |
| FRIENDS OF RADNOR LAKE | $100,000 |
| NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION | $100,000 |
| OPERATION STAND DOWN | $100,000 |
| SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK | $80,000 |
| COMMUNIO | $75,000 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $75,000 |
| CHEEKWOOD BOTANICAL GARDEN & | $66,000 |
| FRIENDS OF LAKESIDE LABS | $62,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $892k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
133 repeat relationships — 71 still active in FY2024, 62 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $302k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BUBelmont University6× · 2019–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +55%
THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION4× · 2019–2024 · $750k · revenue +9%- PLPEARSON LAKES ART CENTER4× · 2021–2024 · $530k · revenue +9%
Funded once
- YOYMCA OF THE OKOBOJISone grant, 2021 · $100k
- CHCUMBERLAND HEIGHTS FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +48%
- FUFURMAN UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $45k · revenue +27%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.
The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…
The organization's primary mission is conserving land where people and nature can thrive by creating green corridors linking existing public lands using conservation easments and outright purchase.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.
Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…
To improve the efficacy, speed, cost, sustainability, and scaling of conservation solutions through harnessing exponential technology, innovation, and entrepreneurship to prevent human-induced extinction.
To support healthy communities and a healthy earth, the institute for conservation leadership strengthens leaders, organizations, coalitions and networks.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Okoboji Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
152 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 152 of the 233 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Belmont University ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY BELL ACADEMY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NASHVILLE ↗
- Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PEARSON LAKES ART CENTER ↗
- Who funds NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds HISTORIC ARNOLDS PARK INC ↗
- Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
- Who funds TENNESSEE WILDLIFE FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WARNER PARKS INC ↗
- Who funds TENNESSEE STATE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION STAND DOWN TENNESSEE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF RADNOR LAKE ↗
- Who funds NASHVILLE ZOO INC ↗
- Who funds LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds IOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FREEDOMWORKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds NASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNIO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BARRY GOLDWATER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds TENNESSEE GOLF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SANIBEL-CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BEACON CENTER OF TENNESSEE ↗
- Who funds THE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE ↗
- Who funds THE CROSSROADS CAMPUS ↗
- Who funds REBOOT RECOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds MEN OF VALOR ↗
- Who funds PET COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEXT DOOR INC ↗
- Who funds BAREFOOT REPUBLIC INC ↗
- Who funds MARTHA O'BRYAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AGAPE ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
- Who funds INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Center for Orangutan & Chimpanzee Conservation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hca Healthcare Foundation · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Memorial Foundation Inc · The Frist Foundation · Nashville Predators Foundation · The Wade-Buntin Family Foundation · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · Dorothy Cate and Thomas F Frist Foundation · Louie M & Betty M Phillips Foundatn · The Steven & Laurie Eskind Family Foundation · Ebs Foundation · Louise B Wallace Foundation 19702
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Andrea Waitt Carlton Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Next Door Inc — 39% of income from government
- Sanibel-Captiva Conservation Foundation — 4% of income from government
- Sea Turtle Conservancy — 1% of income from government
- Humane Society of Marion County Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pet Alliance of Greater Orlando Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Andrea Waitt Carlton Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Andrea Waitt Carlton Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.