Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Corrales Friends of Animals Foundation Dba Dennis Friends Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$692k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of CORRALES FRIENDS OF ANIMALS FOUNDATION DBA DENNIS FRIENDS FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $327k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $351k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALBUQUERQUE ANIMAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT$100,000
HUMANE RESCUE ALLIANCE$100,000
PAWS AND STRIPES$50,738
BRO AND TRACY ANIMAL WELFARE$50,000
REZDAWG RESCUE INC$50,000
ARGOS A SHELTER DOG RESCUE$47,100
DOGSTERS SPAY & NEUTER PROGRAM$35,400
ANIMAL HUMANE NEW MEXICO$35,000
A CHANCE OF A LIFETIME$30,000
EVERGREEN ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE (EAPL)$25,000
LA PLATA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$24,000
MEALS ON WHEELS NEW MEXICO$20,000
GREATER GOOD CHARITIES$20,000
FRONT RANGE FREEDOM RESCUE$15,000
STREET CAT HUB INC$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%STREET CAT HUB INC: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
CO
KY
VA
NM
NC
DC
HI
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.7M · 26 repeat orgs$800k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
25

Total granted

$2.7M
$625k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+25%

Still filing today

73%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $425k · revenue +76%
  • BA
    BRO AND TRACY ANIMAL WELFARE INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $256k · revenue +92% · 28% of their budget
  • EA
    EVERGREEN ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE
    6× · 2017–2025 · $135k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • VO
    VILLAGE OF CORRALES ANIMAL SERVICES
    one grant, 2023 · $242k
  • AD
    ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WESTgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue +40%
  • BW
    Brother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
2
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
3
Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

Animal Welfare

—
4
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
5
Beaverhead Animal Shelter

The mission is to protect and care for homeless animals in the Dillon and Beaverhead county area.

Animals
6
Hart

Animal shelter and rescue

Animals
7
Jet Wag Animal Rescue Inc

Our mission is to move adoptable dogs and cats primarily from heavily-burdened areas to loving homes. We work with trusted partners throughout the country and around the world and facilitate vet care, transport, and adoptions to help…

Animals
8
Runaways Animal Rescue
Animals
9
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
10
Phelps County Animal Rescue

provide shelter and care for dogs and cats

Animals
11
2nd Chance Ranch and Rescue

Sanctuary for abused or abandoned animals

Animals
12
St Clouds Rescue
Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gulf Coast Humane Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cloud Dancers Therapeutic Horsemanship Program Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr12%13%5–10yr19%30%10–20yr17%20%20–35yr16%17%35–55yr18%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr12%9%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr17%30%20–35yr16%9%35–55yr18%34%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/44
the rest of the field
12%
1,111/9,596

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/41
Grantees still filing
24/41
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY — $425,000 · AnimalsWASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETYBRO AND TRACY ANIMAL WELFARE INC — $256,210 · AnimalsBRO AND TRACY ANIMAL WELFARE INCEVERGREEN ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE — $135,000 · AnimalsEVERGREEN ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUEARGOS A SHELTER DOG RESCUE — $102,460 · AnimalsARGOS A SHELTER DOG RESCUEREZDAWG RESCUE INC — $87,000 · AnimalsPAWS AND STRIPES INC — $75,738 · AnimalsWATERMELON MOUNTAIN RANCH INC — $74,200 · AnimalsANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC — $71,000 · AnimalsHorse Protection League — $62,000 · AnimalsHOPE FOR HOOVES — $61,680 · Animals+25 more — $498,280 · Animals+25 moreCITY OF ALBUQUERQUE ANIMAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT — $600,000 · OtherCITY OF ALBUQUERQUE ANIMAL WELFARE DEPARTMENTVILLAGE OF CORRALES ANIMAL SERVICES — $242,047 · OtherVILLAGE OF CORRALES ANIMAL SERVICESHOMELESS ANIMAL RESCUE TEAM — $169,000 · OtherHOMELESS ANIMAL RESCUE TEAMIndividual grant recipient — $158,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALBUQUERQUE ANIMAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT — $100,000 · OtherALBUQUERQUE ANIMAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT+15 more — $221,888 · Other+15 moreASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST — $75,000 · Human ServicesSTREET CAT HUB INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesMeals on Wheels New Mexico — $33,200 · Food & NutritionGREATER GOOD CHARITIES — $20,000 · Philanthropy
Animals$1,848,568Other$1,491,435Human Services$90,000Food & Nutrition$33,200Philanthropy$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY — $425,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetBRO AND TRACY ANIMAL WELFARE INC — $256,210 over 5y, 28% of budgetEVERGREEN ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE — $135,000 over 6y, 5.9% of budgetARGOS A SHELTER DOG RESCUE — $102,460 over 4y, 25% of budgetREZDAWG RESCUE INC — $87,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetPAWS AND STRIPES INC — $75,738 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST — $75,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetWATERMELON MOUNTAIN RANCH INC — $74,200 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC — $71,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHorse Protection League — $62,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetHOPE FOR HOOVES — $61,680 over 2y, 49% of budgetA CHANCE OF A LIFETIME — $60,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetNMDOG Inc — $53,500 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetBrother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLA PLATA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $46,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetDogsters Spay and Neuter — $45,400 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetMeals on Wheels New Mexico — $33,200 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCLOUD DANCERS THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP PROGRAM INC — $30,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetPROJECT ANIMALAID — $30,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetFRONT RANGE FREEDOM RESCUE INC — $27,500 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetGULF COAST HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER GOOD CHARITIES — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of Taos Inc dba Stray Hearts Animal Shelter — $19,980 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetNORTHERN COLORADO FRIENDS OF FERALS — $15,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSTREET CAT HUB INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMPANION ANIMAL RESCUE AND MEDICAL ASSISTANCE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetHARLEYS HOPE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetLITTLE RESCUE ON THE PRAIRIE — $5,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetFront-Porch Felines — $5,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetEQUINE RESCUE LEAGUE FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetKENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOWLING GREEN WARREN COUNTY HUMANE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Petsmart Charities IncGreater Good CharitiesPetco LoveAlbuquerque Community…Leslie L Alexander Fo…Carroll Petrie Founda…BISSELL Pet FoundationMary Elizabeth Bates …Best Friends Animal S…The American Society …The Duffield Family F…Pedigree Foundation
Petsmart Charities IncAZ36.9× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Petsmart Charities Inc · Greater Good Charities · Petco Love · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc · Carroll Petrie Foundation · BISSELL Pet Foundation · Mary Elizabeth Bates Foundation · Best Friends Animal Society · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Pedigree Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Corrales Friends of Animals Foundation Dba Dennis Friends Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines