· Public charity
World Vision Inc
World vision, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 74 grants below total $4,889,983 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,113,101,224 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,108,211,241 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k19 grants · $134k
- $10k–50k41 grants · $681k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $1.1M
- $250k+4 grants · $3.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND | $2,000,000 |
| MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL | $500,000 |
| COALITION FOR CHRISTIAN OUTREACH (CCO) | $264,750 |
| LANGHAM PARTNERSHIP USA INC NFP | $252,523 |
| OPERATION BLESSING INTERNATIONAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $235,000 |
| CHRISTIAN AND MISSIONARY ALLIANCE | $157,750 |
| NATIONAL BAPTIST CONVENTION USA INC | $125,000 |
| IMPACT CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP | $100,000 |
| FRONTIER FELLOWSHIP | $100,000 |
| CITYSERVE INTERNATIONAL | $88,000 |
| YOUNG LIFE - PRESCOTT AZ | $76,200 |
| RUGGED CROSS RANCH MINISTRIES DBA 5ROCK RANCH | $65,000 |
| HUNT BAPTIST CHURCH | $59,865 |
| THE NAVIGATORS - COLORADO SPRINGS CO | $50,350 |
| ASHEVILLE DC | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $712k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $934M on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: DEVELOPMENT
Stated purpose: DEVELOPMENT
Stated purpose: DEVELOPMENT
Stated purpose: DEVELOPMENT
Stated purpose: DEVELOPMENT
Stated purpose: DEVELOPMENT
Stated purpose: DEVELOPMENT
Stated purpose: DEVELOPMENT
Stated purpose: DEVELOPMENT
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
106 repeat relationships — 42 still active in FY2025, 64 since wound down; 31 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $862k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL8× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +33%- YLYOUNG LIFE8× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +59%
- AFAWAKENING FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $1000k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- MWMOMENTUM WHEELS FOR HUMANITYgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $485k · revenue +144%
- SISojourners Incone grant, 2018 · $300k · revenue -6%
- HCHAWAII CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTISTSone grant, 2024 · $280k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Bringing hope, healing, and recovery to seattle's homeless through a christ-centered approach.
Sharing Christ's Passion for the world by serving the most vulnerable through national churches and leaders.
Compelled by a deep passion for justice and mercy, World Renew joins communities around the world to renew hope, reconcile lives, and restore creation with programs focused on disaster response, community health, economic opportunity, food…
Miracle hill ministries is committed to life transformation for children and adults experiencing homelessness. more information and program outcomes may be found at www.miraclehill.org.
To lift people out of poverty by responding to human need with the love of christ.
Glorify and serve god by providing meals for hungry men, women, and children, emergency shelter and transition to independence for homeless men, and spiritual hope through jesus christ.
We build bridges between people experiencing the immediate effects of poverty and homelessness to the physical and spiritual resources available to alleviate suffering and facilitate long term transformation.
Transforming lives in the Ville through access to supportive services and efficacy.
Feeding the spiritual and physical hunger, especially in at-risk children.
World orphans vision is to empower the church to care for orphans and vulnerable families. we equip, inspire, and mobilize the church to care for orphans and vulnerable children. churches engaged. children restored. communities transformed…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eugene Mission Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nicholas County Senior Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
511 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR CHRISTIAN OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION FORUM ↗
- Who funds AWAKENING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Groundswell International Inc ↗
- Who funds CORE INC ↗
- Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
- Who funds LANGHAM PARTNERSHIP USA INC NFP ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds RUGGED CROSS RANCH MINISTRIES AKA 5ROCK RANCH ↗
- Who funds MOMENTUM WHEELS FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN FRONTIER FELLOWSHIP ↗
- Who funds CELEBRATE LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
- Who funds CARE OF CREATION INC ↗
- Who funds Sojourners Inc ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds SIOUX FALLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Operation Blessing International Relief and Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN'S CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY METRO MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds PITTSBURGH OPERA INC ↗
- Who funds SAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Stifel Charitable Inc ↗
- Who funds Giving In Motion Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUTH FOR CHRISTUSA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: The Toy Foundation Inc · Greater Tacoma Community Foundation · Food Lifeline · Lesea Global Feed the Hungry Inc · Building Changes · Sower of Seeds International Ministries · Stewardship Foundation · Emergency Food Network of Tacoma and Pierce County · Woodworth Family Foundation · Brothers and Sisters in Christ Foundation · Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation · Howard & Nell E Miller Foundat
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization World Vision Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Deschutes Land Trust — 46% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- Youth 71FIVE Ministries — 16% of income from government
- Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
- Gordon College — 1% of income from government
- Bethlehem Inn — 0% of income from government
- Oregon State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.