· Private foundation
William T Vogt and Lorine E Vogt Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RACQUET CLUB HISTORIA | $100,000 |
| THE UNITED THEATRE | $15,000 |
| COASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY - THE PARENTS' CAMPAIGN OF THE WAKE FOREST FUND | $10,000 |
| JIM HOGG COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT | $10,000 |
| CHURCH OF THE REDEEMER | $5,000 |
| US COURT TENNIS PRESERVATION FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| WESTERLY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| OLE MISS FAMILY LEADERSHIP COUNCIL | $5,000 |
| CHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM | $5,000 |
| BEYOND CELIAC | $5,000 |
| MANN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS | $2,500 |
| SPRINGSIDE CHESTNUT HILL ACADEMY | $2,500 |
| EAST BEACH ASSOCIATION | $1,000 |
| WATCH HILL CHAPEL SOCIETY | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 54% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMANN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS8× · 2017–2024 · $101k · revenue +245%
- CSChristus Spohn Health System Corporation5× · 2017–2024 · $99k · revenue +18%
- SCSPRINGSIDE CHESTNUT HILL ACADEMY8× · 2017–2024 · $64k · revenue +36%
Funded once
- COCHURCH OF THE REDEEMERone grant, 2021 · $25k
- AMART MUSEUM OF SOUTH TEXASone grant, 2017 · $15k
- HVHebbronville Volunteer Fire Departmentone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.
The Chestnut Hill Conservancy conserves, preserves, and celebrates history, architecture, and landscapes in Chestnut Hill and the lower Wissahickon watershed through inclusive and proactive community engagement, advocacy, and stewardship.
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…
Charter school providing students a content rich, adademically rigerous core knowledge education with a well-defined, sequential curriculum in a safe, orderly disiplined and caring environment.
The international tennis hall of fame (ithf) is a non-profit organization that preserves the history of tennis and celebrates to inspire excellence across generations globally. founded in 1954 in newport, ri, the ithf honors tennis'…
The seacoast charter school is a publicly funded elementary and middle school, uniquely focused on experiencing education through the arts.
Founded in 1827, the pennsylvania horticultural society (phs) uses horticulture to advance the health and well-being of the greater philadelphia region. (continued in sch o)phs's work focuses on four impact priorities: creating healthy…
At the chestnut hill school, our mission to educate children is deeply rooted in a commitment to academic excellence, diversity, and community. we engage, challenge and support children as they develop the skills and confidence to achieve…
The association for public art (apa, formerly the fairmount park art association) commissions, preserves, interprets and promotes public art in philadelphia. dedicated to creating a museum without walls that informs, engages and inspires…
The org. is a section of the united states tennis assoc. and is dedicated to carrying out the goals of the national assoc. within its region, particularly with respect to promoting tennis opportunities for juniors and adults of all…
The institution provides educational instruction and activities to students ranging from preschool through 8th grade.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mann Center for the Performing Arts and the most unlike its peers is Hebbronville Volunteer Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED STATES COURT TENNIS PRESERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE OCEAN COMMUNITY UNITED THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds COASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MANN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds Christus Spohn Health System Corporation ↗
- Who funds SPRINGSIDE CHESTNUT HILL ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds BEYOND CELIAC ↗
- Who funds SALISBURY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds HILL COUNTRY YOUTH ORCHESTRAS INC ↗
- Who funds THE WESTERLY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WATCH HILL LIGHTHOUSE KEEPERS ASSOC ↗
- Who funds HISTORIC PRESERVATION & EDUCATION FUND OF THE RACQUET CLUB OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds Hebbronville Volunteer Fire Department ↗
- Who funds East Beach Association ↗
- Who funds WORK TO RIDE INC ↗
- Who funds NEED IN DEED ↗
- Who funds NURTURING MINDS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Peter and Deborah Lamm Foundation R Bradford Malt Et Al Trustees · Chubb Charitable Foundation · AM Roberts Charitable Foundation · Eugene A & Suzanne H Gorab Foundation · The Meredith and Whitney George Family Foundation Inc · Lynch Family Foundation · Forrest C & Frances H Lattner Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization William T Vogt and Lorine E Vogt Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to William T Vogt and Lorine E Vogt Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to William T Vogt and Lorine E Vogt Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.