· Private foundation
The Peter and Deborah Lamm Foundation R Bradford Malt Et Al Trustees
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k43 grants · $122k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE WESTERLY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC | $15,000 |
| WATCH HILL CONSERVANCY | $10,000 |
| MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER | $10,000 |
| CITIZENS HOUSING & PLANNING COUNCIL | $7,500 |
| THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER | $5,000 |
| WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC | $5,000 |
| AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| WNET | $5,000 |
| THE HUNTINGTON THEATRE | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS | $5,000 |
| SESAME WORKSHOP | $5,000 |
| CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC | $5,000 |
| THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART | $5,000 |
| THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
61 repeat relationships — 46 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TWTHE WATCH HILL CONSERVANCY8× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +144%
- CHCITIZENS HOUSING & PLANNING COUNCIL OF N5× · 2020–2024 · $43k · revenue +5%
- MMMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +58%
Funded once
- UUUNICEF USAone grant, 2018 · $80k
FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +361%- OCOCEAN COMMUNITY UNITED THEATERone grant, 2020 · $18k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…
The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.
The municipal art society of new york (mas) lifts up the voices of the people in the debates that shape new york's built environment and leads the way to a more livable city from sidewalk to skyline. mas envisions a future in which all new…
The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…
Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Wmf is the leading independent organization devoted to safeguarding the world's most treasured places to enrich people's lives and build mutual understanding across cultures and communities. the organization is headquartered in new york…
Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…
The national september 11 memorial & museum at the world trade center bears solemn witness to the terrorist attacks of september 11, 2001, and february 26, 1993. located at a site made sacred through loss, the memorial & museum remembers…
The architectural league of new york supports critically transformative work in the allied fields that shape the built environment. as a vital, independent forum, the league stimulates thinking, debate, and action on today's (continued on…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Park Conservancy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of California. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE WESTERLY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE WATCH HILL CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS HOUSING & PLANNING COUNCIL OF N ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE OCEAN COMMUNITY UNITED THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds FILM AT LINCOLN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HUNTINGTON THEATRE CO INC ↗
- Who funds THE JONNYCAKE CENTER OF WESTERLY INC ↗
- Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
- Who funds SESAME WORKSHOP ↗
- Who funds HOPE 4 KIDS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MYASTHENIA GRAVIS FOUNDATION OF CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗
- Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
- Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds OCEAN COMMUNITY YMCA ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
- Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
- Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
- Who funds THE TOBY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds WINE EDUCATION COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Royce Family Fund Inc · Chelsea Groton Foundation · Forrest C & Frances H Lattner Foundation · Washington Trust Co Charitable Fdn · The Rhode Island Community Foundation · AM Roberts Charitable Foundation · Ashaway Charitable Trust · Lynch Family Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Eugene A & Suzanne H Gorab Foundation · The Ninigret Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Peter and Deborah Lamm Foundation R Bradford Malt Et Al Trustees funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Huntington Theatre Co Inc — 4% of income from government
- Lawrence Memorial Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Peter and Deborah Lamm Foundation R Bradford Malt Et Al Trustees?
Find your warmest path to The Peter and Deborah Lamm Foundation R Bradford Malt Et Al Trustees through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.