Skip to content
Wegener Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Wegener Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$516k
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$1.1MHealth$771kHousing & Shelter$282kYouth Development$194kCrime & Legal$131kArts & Culture$102kEducation$97kRecreation & Sports$83kOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k35 grants · $440k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC$50,000
HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION$27,500
WINGS SPECIAL NEEDS COMMUNITY INC$27,500
TEEN RECOVERY SOLUTIONS$20,000
METRO TECHNOLOGY CENTERS FOUNDATION$20,000
SAVANNAH STATION THERAPEUTIC RIDING$20,000
THE DRAGONFLY HOME$20,000
CITY RESCUE MISSION INC$15,000
SISU YOUTH INC$15,000
GENESIS PROJECT$15,000
OKLAHOMA MESSAGES PROJECT$10,000
OKLAHOMA SINGLE PARENT SCHOLARSHIP$10,000
AUTISMOKLAHOMA$10,000
LIMBS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION$10,000
HOPEHOUSE OKC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%THE RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY INCORPORATED: $10k → 15%CARE CENTER: $12k → 16%PEPPERS RANCH: $15k → 12%THE RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY INCORPORATED: $10k → 15%THE CARE CENTER: $10k → 16%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $10k → 9%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES I: $10k → 13%RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY: $10k → 15%CARE CENTER: $10k → 16%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $10k → 9%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $10k → 13%CARE CENTER: $10k → 16%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $10k → 9%PEPPERS RANCH INC: $10k → 12%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $10k → 13%TULSA BOYS' HOME: $10k → 15%THE CARE CENTER: $10k → 16%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $10k → 9%THE CARE CENTER: $10k → 16%PEPPERS RANCH INC: $10k → 12%THE CARE CENTER: $10k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $30k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $15k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $15k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $15k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $11k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION: $40k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION: $28k → 16%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $13k → 16%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $13k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING: $30k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING: $20k → 16%SISU YOUTH INC: $15k → 16%SISU YOUTH INC: $15k → 16%SISU YOUTH INC: $15k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING: $15k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $15k → 16%WINGS SPECIAL NEEDS COMMUNITY INC: $25k → 16%WINGS SPECIAL NEEDS COMMUNITY INC: $15k → 16%PIVOT INC: $15k → 16%PIVOT INC: $15k → 16%PIVOT INC: $15k → 16%PIVOT INC: $15k → 16%PIVOT INC: $15k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $15k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $15k → 16%PEPPER'S RANCH: $15k → 16%PEPPER'S RANCH: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 97 repeat orgs$266k to everyone else

97 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 65 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

97
44

Total granted

$3.5M
$195k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+28%

Still filing today

69%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Hearts for Hearing Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $178k · revenue +291%
  • LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $140k · revenue +69%
  • WS
    WINGS SPECIAL NEEDS COMMUNITY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $123k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • DR
    DALE ROGERS TRAINING CENTER INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +14%
  • OC
    OK CRISIS NURSERY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • W
    WILDCARE
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Hope House Inc

Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.

Health
2
Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc

The mission of the okcfjc is to provide protection, hope and healing to those impacted by domestic and family violence in the oklahoma city community. the organization provides a centrally located facility which co-locates and coordinates…

Crime & Legal
3
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
4
Oklahoma Child Care Resource & Referral Association Inc

Our Mission is for all Oklahoma families to have access to quality care and education for their children through community-based resource and referral services; with a vision of Oklahoma communities supporting the development and learning…

—
5
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
6
Oklahoma Parents Center Inc

The programs and services of OPC are based on the concept of educating parents to improve their child's quality of life. Our mission is to train, educate and support parents, families, professionals and consumers in building partnerships…

Health
7
Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers

Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers, Inc. serves the community behavioral health needs of nine counties of Southern Oklahoma. Lighthouse offers integrated care through their outpatient and Health Home programs to adults and children.…

Health
8
Child Advocacy Center of Central Ok Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…

Human Services
9
Help in Crisis Inc

Our mission is to eliminate family violence, stalking, child abuse, and sexual assault through advocacy, education, counseling, support and prevention services.

Human Services
10
Tulsa Casa Inc

Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights
11
Casa of Southern Oklahoma Inc

Solicit, train & direct activities of court-appointed volunteer advocates for children in cases involving child abuse and neglect. assist in direct expense needs of individual children in court-appointed cases.

Civil Rights
12
Okmulgee County Family Resource Ctr

Crisis intervention services and full shelter for victims and their children of domestic violence/sexual assault. Advocates for abused children in the court system.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Positive Tomorrows Inc; the most unlike its peers is Not Your Average Joe. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

91 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 91 of the 148 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
25
Early backer (in before they grew)
86/91
Grantees still filing
60/91
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Hearts for Hearing Foundation: $177,500 · Human ServicesHearts for Hearing FoundationWINGS SPECIAL NEEDS COMMUNITY INC: $122,500 · Human ServicesWINGS SPECIAL NEEDS COMMUNITY INCCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $113,000 · Human ServicesCITY RESCUE MISSION INCPIVOT INC: $87,000 · Human ServicesPIVOT INCPEPPERS RANCH INC: $82,000 · Human ServicesPEPPERS RANCH INCSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $78,000 · Human ServicesSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INCSPECIAL CARE INC: $74,000 · Human ServicesCare Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc DBA The CARE Center: $72,000 · Human ServicesCITY CARE INC: $65,000 · Human ServicesDaily Living Centers Inc: $61,000 · Human ServicesSISU YOUTH INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesTHE ANNA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION: $52,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $50,000 · Human Services+21 more: $321,500 · Human Services+21 moreLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $140,000 · OtherLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INCNEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES: $67,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA MESSAGES PROJECT: $66,000 · OtherA CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION: $61,000 · OtherRESTOREOKC INC: $60,000 · OtherTWIN CEDARS INC: $60,000 · Other+84 more: $1,045,500 · Other+84 moreLIMBS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $92,000 · HealthLIMBS FOR …HOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC: $79,000 · HealthHOPE IS AL…The Children's Center Inc: $68,000 · HealthThe Childr…THE EDEN CLINIC INC: $43,000 · HealthTHE EDEN C…OKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC: $15,000 · HealthDown Syndrome Association of Central Oklahoma: $15,000 · Health+2 more: $21,000 · Health+2 moreEXCHANGE CLUB CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE OF OKLAHOMA INC: $70,000 · Crime & LegalLittle Light Ministries Inc: $55,000 · Crime & LegalCASA VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $35,000 · Crime & LegalREMERGE INC: $20,000 · Crime & LegalREDEEMING THE FAMILY: $10,000 · Crime & LegalPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $74,000 · Youth DevelopmentSHILOH SUMMER CAMP INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentGirl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentNEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC: $48,000 · EmploymentThe Meadows Center for Opportunity Inc: $40,000 · EmploymentNot Your Average Joe: $15,000 · EmploymentASPIRING ATTITUDES INC: $55,000 · Arts & CultureWILLOW PREGNANCY SUPPORT INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureTHEATRE TULSA INC: $18,000 · Arts & CultureSPARK CREATIVE LAB INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$1,410,500Other$1,499,500Health$333,000Crime & Legal$190,000Youth Development$109,000Employment$103,000Arts & Culture$98,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHearts for Hearing Foundation: $177,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $140,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetWINGS SPECIAL NEEDS COMMUNITY INC: $122,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $113,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetLIMBS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $92,000 over 9y, 9.3% of budgetPIVOT INC: $87,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetPEPPERS RANCH INC: $82,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetHOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC: $79,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $78,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $74,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSPECIAL CARE INC: $74,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCare Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc DBA The CARE Center: $72,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetEXCHANGE CLUB CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE OF OKLAHOMA INC: $70,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetThe Children's Center Inc: $68,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCITY CARE INC: $65,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetA CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION: $61,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetDaily Living Centers Inc: $61,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTWIN CEDARS INC: $60,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetRESTOREOKC INC: $60,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetASPIRING ATTITUDES INC: $55,000 over 3y, 34% of budgetSISU YOUTH INC: $55,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetLittle Light Ministries Inc: $55,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetTHE ANNA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION: $52,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC: $48,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EDEN CLINIC INC: $43,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetThe Meadows Center for Opportunity Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetThe Center of Family Love: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCASA VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $35,000 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetTHE RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY INC: $35,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTEEN RECOVERY SOLUTIONS INC: $35,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetTHE GENESIS PROJECT: $35,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetHealth Alliance for the Uninsured: $30,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetUPWARD TRANSITIONS INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetMETRO TECHNOLOGY CENTERS FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetCALM WATERS CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetThe Dragonfly Home Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE CHANGE ACADEMY INC: $23,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWILLOW PREGNANCY SUPPORT INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetREMERGE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSHILOH SUMMER CAMP INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetFAMILY BUILDERS INC: $19,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHEATRE TULSA INC: $18,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetBritVil Community Food Pantry: $17,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE URBAN MISSION INC: $16,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hearts for Hearing Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds WINGS SPECIAL NEEDS COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds LIMBS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PIVOT INC ↗
  • Who funds PEPPERS RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc DBA The CARE Center ↗
  • Who funds EXCHANGE CLUB CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds CITY CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds A CHANCE TO CHANGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Daily Living Centers Inc ↗
  • Who funds TWIN CEDARS INC ↗
  • Who funds RESTOREOKC INC ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRING ATTITUDES INC ↗
  • Who funds SISU YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Little Light Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ANNA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EDEN CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds The Meadows Center for Opportunity Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Center of Family Love ↗
  • Who funds CASA VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds TEEN RECOVERY SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GENESIS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Health Alliance for the Uninsured ↗
  • Who funds UPWARD TRANSITIONS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Communi…Sarkeys FoundationEl and Thelma Gaylord…Communities Foundatio…Inasmuch FoundationHarris Foundation IncLove Meyer Family Fou…American Fidelity Fou…Kirkpatrick Family Af…The Anne and Henry Za…The Merrick FoundationCresap Family Foundat…
Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK114× affinity61 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Inasmuch Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · Love Meyer Family Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wegener Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wegener Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 370%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Dale Rogers Training Center Inc: 79% of income from government
  • Crossroads Youth & Family Services Inc: 78% of income from government
  • Sunbeam Family Services Inc: 52% of income from government
  • Newview Oklahoma Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Remerge Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Theatre Tulsa Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Pivot Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Special Care Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
37get no government money at all
35report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wegener Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Wegener Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 148 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wegener’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home