How much did Weaver and Tidwell Private Foundation grant in FY2025?

Weaver and Tidwell Private Foundation reported 50 grants totaling $98,584 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is Weaver and Tidwell Private Foundation based?

Weaver and Tidwell Private Foundation is based in TX.

Weaver and Tidwell Private Foundation

Foundation Dossiers

· Private foundation

Weaver and Tidwell Private Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$99k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$4k

Largest

01What you fund

01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$177kInternational$158kHealth$125kHousing & Shelter$124kFood & Nutrition$106kYouth Development$91kEducation$26kCommunity Improvement$18kOther$0

02FY2025 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY	$4,000
THE ALS ASSOCIATION	$4,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES INC	$3,919
PATHFINDERS	$2,917
MEALS ON WHEELS	$2,917
THE WARM PLACE	$2,916
THE WOMEN'S CENTER	$2,500
AGAPE RESOURCE AND ASSISTANCE CENTER	$2,081
BABY2BABY	$2,000
HOUSTON WELCOMES REFUGEES	$2,000
HUGH O'BRIAN YOUTH LEADERSHIP	$2,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE FORTH WORTH	$2,000
NOAHBRAVE FOUNDATION	$2,000
ARLINGTON LIFE SHELTER	$2,000
IT'S A SENSORY WORLD	$2,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $114k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$242k · 33 repeat orgs$659k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

208

Total granted

$242k

$595k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%

+1%

Still filing today

94%

69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SA
SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK
2× · 2020–2022 · $11k · revenue +18%
TA
Tarrant Area Food Bank
3× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +26%
AH
American Heart Association Inc
4× · 2018–2025 · $11k · revenue +26%

Funded once

TG
THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC
one grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue 0%
TG
THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC (CARE PORTAL)
one grant, 2023 · $63k
HF
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
one grant, 2017 · $60k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Texas Inc

To help children reach their potential through professionally supported one-to-one relationships with measurable impact.

—

Children's Connections Inc

Children's connections' mission is to empower families, promote healthy early childhood development, and foster family engagement to ensure a strong foundation for lifelong well-being.

Human Services

Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health

Family and Child Guidance Center

Our mission is to provide quality mental health services to children and adults in low income families who are impacted by severe and persistent mental illness, emotional disturbances, child abuse and neglect, high-risk behaviors and…

Health

Any Baby Can of Austin Inc

Any baby can, an austin-based nonprofit, partners with parents so children reach their full potential. with programs that meet clients where they are at home, work or school any baby can provides in-home therapy, parent education, mental…

—

Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County

The mission of Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County (Family Houston) is to create a stronger community for tomorrow by helping individuals and families meet the challenges they face today. We help others help themselves.

Human Services

Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement

National Domestic Violence Hotline

The national domestic violence hotline provides crisis intervention, saftey planning, resources, information, and referrals to those affected by relationship abuse.

Human Services

Pressley Ridge Texas

Texas family care network, a division of pressley ridge texas, is the single source continuum contractor (sscc) for region 5 (deep east) of texas. as the sscc, texas family care network finds forever families for children in state care by…

Human Services

Child Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network

In Tulsa County there are several agencies that address prevention and treatment of child abuse, but the Child Advocacy Network (CAN) is the ONLY nonprofit that provides intervention services for children and their nonoffending…

Crime & Legal

Texprotects-the Texas Association for the Protection of Children

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development

Homeless Network of Texas

To lead texas communities to make homelessness rare, brief, and non- curring; to help communities strategically plan to prevent and end homelessness.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childserve Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Apogee Strong Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1%3/209

the rest of the field

15%

20,232/136,595

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

203 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 203 of the 278 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

195/203

Grantees still filing

106/203

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$406,750Health$132,003Human Services$113,200Philanthropy$83,150Youth Development$58,500Housing & Shelter$31,331Food & Nutrition$22,500

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Moody FoundationTX39.3× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Moody Foundation · Ken W Davis Foundation · Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust · Permian Basin Area Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Abell-Hanger Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Beal Foundation · Scharbauer Foundation Inc · Warren Charitable Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Weaver and Tidwell Private Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

5get no government money at all

61report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home

State money flows

the interactive map of money crossing state lines