· Private foundation
Van Konynenburg Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k18 grants · $69k
- $10k–50k31 grants · $553k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $275k
- $250k+1 grant · $265k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CALVARY CHURCH OF PAC PALIS | $265,000 |
| UNION RESCUE MISSION | $175,000 |
| HIGHER GROUND SUN VALLEY INC | $50,000 |
| UCLA FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART | $35,714 |
| CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES | $30,000 |
| CHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL | $30,000 |
| COMMUNITY CHURCH PLAYA | $25,000 |
| SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATI | $25,000 |
| A RESTORATION CHURCH | $25,000 |
| CITY OF HOPE | $25,000 |
| TROJAN SIG FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| LAND OF THE FREE FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $820k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
75 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2024, 43 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $181k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- URUNION RESCUE MISSION8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +125%
- CCCALVARY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL FOUNDATION2× · 2019–2020 · $200k · revenue +19% · 80% of their budget
- TUTHE ULI FOUNDATION6× · 2018–2023 · $194k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- TLTeam Luke Hope for Mindsgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $125k · revenue +27%
- HVHARLEM VILLAGE ACADEMIESone grant, 2017 · $50k
- CMCATALYST MISSIONS GROUP'S FUNDone grant, 2019 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.
The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…
City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint John's Health Center Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Promontory Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
90 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 90 of the 139 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds CALVARY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ULI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LAND OF THE FREE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
- Who funds Team Luke Hope for Minds ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
- Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
- Who funds PACIFICA CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EAST HARLEM TUTORIAL PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds HIGHER GROUND USA INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL EATING DISORDERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds The Everychild Foundation ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Harvest Home Inc ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NASHVILLE ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds VALLEY RECOVERY RESOURCES ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES WATERKEEPER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Silk Family Foundation · March Family Foundation · Jay and Carol Borzi Family Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · California Community Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Weingart Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Van Konynenburg Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.