· Private foundation
Jay and Carol Borzi Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 45% of JAY AND CAROL BORZI FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $109k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BEL-AIR COUNTRY CLUB EDUCATION FUND | $100,000 |
| KCRW FOUNDATION INC | $50,000 |
| SEAL FUTURE FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| UCLA FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES | $23,750 |
| MIRACLES FOR KIDS | $10,000 |
| CHILDRENS HOSPITAL COLORADO | $10,000 |
| CITY OF HOPE | $10,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA | $6,250 |
| FAMILY VIOLENCE LAW CENTER | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LOLAND OF THE FREE FOUNDATION4× · 2018–2022 · $130k · revenue +74%
- CHChildren's Hospital Los Angeles4× · 2018–2024 · $127k · revenue +27%
- KFKCRW FOUNDATION INC2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- MIMyGoodness Incone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -100% · 95% of their budget
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $100k
- HVHARLEM VILLAGE ACADEMIESone grant, 2017 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.
The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…
The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.
The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.
The league of california community foundations promotes and strengthens community foundations in california. through collaboration and shared learning among member foundations and building partnerships with private and public entities, we…
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Miracle Network and the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LAND OF THE FREE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds KCRW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MyGoodness Inc ↗
- Who funds MIRACLES FOR KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds JOHN MALLINGER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds PEDIATRIC THERAPY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds SEAL FUTURE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds KIDWORKS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES WATERKEEPER ↗
- Who funds NEW SCHOOL FOR CHILD DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds EAT LEARN PLAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ROD DEDEAUX FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds MANHATTAN BEACH EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Silk Family Foundation · Van Konynenburg Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Orange County Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · March Family Foundation · The Crail-Johnson Foundation · California Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jay and Carol Borzi Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.