· Public charity
USA Hockey Foundation
To raise funds and acquire assets for usa hockey, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $50k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $278k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $552k
- $250k+1 grant · $11M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| USA HOCKEY INC | $11,200,000 |
| USA HOCKEY INC | $200,000 |
| USA HOCKEY INC | $162,441 |
| MAYO CLINIC SPORTS MEDICINE CENTER | $75,000 |
| USA HOCKEY INC | $65,000 |
| USA HOCKEY INC | $50,000 |
| USA HOCKEY INC | $25,000 |
| MINNESOTA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION | $24,860 |
| AMERICAN HEARING IMPAIRED HOCKEY ASSOCIATION | $20,000 |
| AMERICAN HOCKEY COACHES ASSOCIATION | $20,000 |
| US HOCKEY HALL OF FAME MUSEUM | $20,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS HOCKEY | $19,714 |
| NEW YORK STATE AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION | $19,697 |
| MID-AMERICAN HOCKEY ASSOCIATION | $18,509 |
| UNITED HEROES LEAGUE | $17,103 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
40 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UHUSA HOCKEY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $81M · revenue +33%
- AHAMATUER HOCKEY ASSOC ILLINOIS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $297k · revenue +7%
- MHMINNESOTA HOCKEY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $221k · revenue +59%
Funded once
- AHADVENT HEALTH CENTER ICEone grant, 2019 · $30k
- SISharks Ice LLCone grant, 2017 · $25k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $16k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Youth hockey development
The american collegiate hockey association is the national governing body for the sport of ice hockey at the collegiate level throughout the united states. the overall objective is to maintain the highest possible standards for the sport…
Empowering youth through memorable hockey experiences, fostering respect, discipline, and sportsmanship, while nurturing talent and emphasizing hard work and team spirit.
Providing youth sports activites
The kcyha provides a fun developmental and competitive athletic experience to its players and their families.
To provide its members an organized curriculum to play hockey
Develop hockey skills in youth hockey players and provide a competitive team to compete with other teams in the midwest.
Become ambassadors of youth hockey while developing players to reach their maximum potential. have respect and love for the game while acting with integrity, fairness, and honesty.
The organization's mission is to develop and encourage sportsmanship among all players, encourage and improve standards of hockey in the state of maine, unite all maine amateur youth hockey teams into one association, conduct annual…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Usa Hockey Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Gary and Leslie Howard Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds USA HOCKEY INC ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds AMATUER HOCKEY ASSOC ILLINOIS INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA HOCKEY INC ↗
- Who funds EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES HOCKEY HALL OF FAME MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK STATE AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS HOCKEY INC ↗
- Who funds Michigan Amateur Hockey Association ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN HEARING IMPAIRED HOCKEY ASSN INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN HOCKEY COACHES ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Mid American District Hockey Inc ↗
- Who funds MID ATLANTIC AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND YANKEE HOCKEY CONFERENCE INC - USA HOCKEY NE DIST ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED HEROES LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds POTOMAC VALLEY AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC PVAHA ↗
- Who funds SLED HOCKEY AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOC INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds STATEWIDE AMATEUR HOCKEY OF FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CLARK PARK COALITION ↗
- Who funds PITTSBURGH ICE ↗
- Who funds COLUMBUS ICE HOCKEY CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds DINOMIGHTS ↗
- Who funds DOMINIK HASEK YOUTH HOCKEY LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds ED SNIDER YOUTH HOCKEY & EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds WESTCHESTER HOCKEY ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds ICE HOCKEY IN HARLEM INC ↗
- Who funds FORT DUPONT ICE HOCKEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOCKEY IN NEW JERSEY INC ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO SAINTS YOUTH HOCKEY CLUB ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Nhl Foundation US Inc · USA Hockey Inc · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · Monumental Sports & Entertainment Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization USA Hockey Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Hockey Inc — 12% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.