Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$18M
Granted FY2025still arriving
964
Grants FY2025still arriving
50
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Recreation & Sports$49MEducation$20MYouth Development$11MCommunity Improvement$6.9MHuman Services$2.0MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.5MEnvironment$1.5MPublic Benefit$1.3MOther$0
02FY2025 · 964 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k620 grants · $2.3M
  • $10k–50k311 grants · $4.7M
  • $50k–250k24 grants · $2.0M
  • $250k+9 grants · $9.0M
$5,000
Median grant
50
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EVERY KID SPORT$2,500,000
GOOD SPORTS INC$2,000,000
LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORP$2,000,000
MCKEESPORT AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT$930,000
DONORSCHOOSEORG$500,000
MCKEESPORT HIGH SCHOOL$275,000
MARATHON KIDS INC$250,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$250,000
MARATHON KIDS$250,000
SERIOUSFUN CHILDRENS NETWORK$150,000
CITY OF SHREVEPORT$110,000
MARTIN LUTHER KING HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL$100,000
MERGING VETS AND PLAYERS$100,000
BEAT THE STREETS CLEVELAND$100,000
KIDS 2 CAMP FUND OF THE GREATER$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ACCOUNTABILITY FOR LIFE: $10k → 9%ENVISION BLIND SPORTS: $15k → 13%BREAK THE BARRIERS INC: $20k → 19%ENVISION BLIND SPORTS: $15k → 13%STREET SOCCER USA INC: $10k → 10%ENVISION BLIND SPORTS: $10k → 13%OAKLAND LACROSSE CLUB: $15k → 10%EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP: $12k → 19%LEMOYNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 12%LEMOYNE COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 12%CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $40k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $10k → 10%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%VETERANS YOGA PROJECT: $25k → 10%CAMP KESEM NATIONAL: $100k → 14%STREET SOCCER USA INC: $75k → 17%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%CARMELO ANTHONY FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%WEINGART EAST LOS ANGELES YMCA: $10k → 14%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $10k → 11%ANGEL CITY ALLIANCE: $25k → 14%JASMINE NYREE HOME: $25k → 11%URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%JASMINE NYREE HOMES INC: $20k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $10k → 11%WOODLANDS FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 11%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $25k → 17%SOLDIERS TO SIDELINES: $15k → 10%ESTREET COMMUNITY CENTER: $75k → 11%LEAD FOUNDATION: $15k → 5%DISABLED SPORTS USA: $15k → 5%ACTIVE SOCIAL COMMUNITIES: $21k → 19%AFAR: $50k → 17%BEARINGS BIKE SHOP: $13k → 13%ACTIVE SOCIAL COMMUNITIES: $21k → 19%YMCA OF THE GREATER HOUSTON AREA: $50k → 16%GATEWAY REGION YMCA: $15k → 21%AFAR INC: $15k → 17%BUDDY FUND: $15k → 21%RISE LEAGUE INC: $75k → 13%LEAD INC: $25k → 13%ABILITY 360: $58k → 11%LEAD INC: $25k → 13%LEAD INC: $13k → 13%PHOENIX SUNS CHARITIES: $50k → 11%BOSTON ATHLETIC ACADEMY: $15k → 16%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$65M · 727 repeat orgs$26M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.

727 repeat relationships — 292 still active in FY2025, 435 since wound down; 300 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

727
962

Total granted

$65M
$21M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+0%

Still filing today

56%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • D
    DONORSCHOOSEORG
    6× · 2017–2025 · $10M · revenue +24%
  • US
    UNITED STATES SOCCER FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $5.0M · revenue +87%
  • PF
    PGA FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $666k · revenue +157%

Funded once

  • DC
    DONORS CHOOSE
    one grant, 2022 · $1.6M
  • GS
    GOOD SPORTS INC BUSINESS CHEC
    one grant, 2024 · $840k
  • GO
    GIRLS ON THE RUN INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2020 · $799k · revenue +9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
So Cal Aces Baseball Club

Youth sports

Religion
2
Matteson Youth Athletic Association

Sports program for youth

Recreation & Sports
3
Stratford High School Lacrosse

Youth Sports activities

Recreation & Sports
4
Marauders Baseball Club

Youth Baseball league

5
Mitchell Park Youth Sports League
Recreation & Sports
6
Westchester Elite Sports & Recreation Inc

Youth sports and recreation for all to help develop social skills.

Recreation & Sports
7
Georgia Youth Sports Alliance Inc
8
Dhs Club

Youth sports - physical education & skills development

9
Team Tyus

Provide a competitive and supportive environment for youth athletes to develop as basketball players and learn important life lessons along the way.

Recreation & Sports
10
Cherry Creek Youth Sports

To provide various sports and trained coaches to the boys and girls in our youth community ages 5-14.

Youth Development
11
Just Amazing Youth Sports Inc
Youth Development
12
Flow Athletics

Flow provides the mentorship, resources, and community support that allow young athletes to thrive across every field, court and classroom. Our purpose at Flow Athletics is to prepare the next generation of student-athletes for life on and…

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Sports Inc and the most unlike its peers is Couloak Steelers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports ProgramsCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Women & Girls Leadership De…Youth Development CentersIndependent K-12 SchoolsYouth Development ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportPolicy Research and AdvocacyMilitary Veterans SupportHealth Access Advocacy and …Local History MuseumsChristian Missionary Organi…Dance Arts OrganizationsSchool District FoundationsFaith-Based Social ServicesYouth Mentoring ProgramsCancer Support ServicesYmca Youth DevelopmentAffordable Housing Developm…Community FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Christian Youth CampsSchool Parent OrganizationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Senior Support ServicesJewish Community Organizati…Equine Therapy ProgramsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Local Food System Organizat…Elementary Literacy TutoringImmigrant Worker SupportVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…United Way AffiliatesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%12%<5yr14%19%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%17%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%48%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%5%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 17% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%84/2,747
the rest of the field
13%
240,312/1,816,818

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

897 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 897 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

41
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
195
Early backer (in before they grew)
856/897
Grantees still filing
497/897
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Every Kid Sports — $9,601,745 · Recreation & SportsEvery Kid SportsUNITED STATES SOCCER FOUNDATION INC — $5,000,000 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STATES SOCCER FOUNDATI…+32 more — $3,109,500 · Recreation & Sports+32 moreMCKEESPORT AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT — $2,466,046 · OtherMCKEESPORT AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTDONORS CHOOSE — $1,650,000 · OtherDONORS CHOOSEMCKEESPORT HIGH SCHOOL — $1,450,000 · OtherMCKEESPORT HIGH SCHOOLAMERICAN RED CROSS — $1,000,000 · OtherGOOD SPORTS INC BUSINESS CHEC — $840,000 · OtherPGA FOUNDATION INC — $666,000 · Other+105 more — $11,599,231 · Other+105 moreGOOD SPORTS INC — $9,957,000 · Youth DevelopmentGOOD SPORTS INCGIRLS ON THE RUN INTERNATIONAL INC — $798,950 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS ON THE RUN INTERN…MARATHON KIDS INC — $520,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE LINDSEY VONN FOUNDATION — $500,000 · Youth Development+26 more — $2,428,600 · Youth Development+26 moreDONORSCHOOSEORG — $10,220,000 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORG+7 more — $524,000 · EducationLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $3,500,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $65,000 · Community ImprovementAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $500,000 · Human ServicesSTREET SOCCER USA INC — $109,000 · Human ServicesCamp Kesem National — $100,000 · Human ServicesEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Human ServicesRISE LEAGUE INC — $85,000 · Human ServicesCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $85,000 · Human ServicesTHE CARMELO ANTHONY FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesE Street Community Center — $75,000 · Human ServicesAFAR INC DBA THE ABILITY CENTER — $65,000 · Human ServicesABILITY360 INC — $65,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area — $63,000 · Human ServicesLEAD INC — $62,500 · Human ServicesPHOENIX SUNS CHARITIES INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE LEBRON JAMES FAMILY FOUNDATION — $1,001,000 · Public BenefitMERGING VETS AND PLAYERS — $100,000 · Public Benefit
Recreation & Sports$17,711,245Other$19,671,277Youth Development$14,204,550Education$10,744,000Community Improvement$3,565,000Human Services$1,434,500Public Benefit$1,101,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $10,220,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetGOOD SPORTS INC — $9,957,000 over 5y, 19% of budgetEvery Kid Sports — $9,601,745 over 5y, 52% of budgetUNITED STATES SOCCER FOUNDATION INC — $5,000,000 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $3,500,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LEBRON JAMES FAMILY FOUNDATION — $1,001,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN INTERNATIONAL INC — $798,950 over 1y, 12% of budgetPGA FOUNDATION INC — $666,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetMARATHON KIDS INC — $520,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $500,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEYOND SPORT FOUNDATION INC — $435,100 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetLITTLE LEAGUE INTERNATIONAL — $400,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION — $305,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetConservation Lands Foundation — $215,682 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC — $215,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION ALLIANCE — $200,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $195,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC — $138,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetALLEGHENY COUNCIL TO IMPROVE OUR NEIGHBORHOODS-HOUSING INCORPORATED — $131,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK JUNIOR TENNIS LEAGUE INC — $125,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSOCCER UNITY PROJECT INC — $125,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetTHE SANNEH FOUNDATION — $123,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetHOUSTON REVISION — $120,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetRAES HOPE INC — $120,000 over 4y, 95% of budgetOutreach with Lacrosse Schools — $115,000 over 4y, 8.8% of budgetUP2US INC — $110,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetPEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL — $110,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetSTREET SOCCER USA INC — $109,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetIRONBOUND BOXING AND EDUCATION INC — $105,000 over 3y, 46% of budgetMERGING VETS AND PLAYERS — $100,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEEL CITY SQUASH INC — $100,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetANCHORAGE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetBEAT THE STREETS CHICAGO — $98,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetVERTUS CHARTER SCHOOL — $98,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSpringSpirit Inc — $97,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetGET ON THE BUS INC — $96,500 over 2y, 24% of budgetFIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC — $92,500 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetTROY HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC — $91,000 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetSHOOTING TOUCH INC — $90,500 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetHOMEWOOD CHIDREN'S VILLAGE — $90,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetOUR MILITARY KIDS INC — $90,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetPEOPLE FOR PALMER PARK — $87,500 over 4y, 39% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG
  • Who funds GOOD SPORTS INC
  • Who funds Every Kid Sports
  • Who funds UNITED STATES SOCCER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION
  • Who funds THE LEBRON JAMES FAMILY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds PGA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MARATHON KIDS INC
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds THE LINDSEY VONN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BEYOND SPORT FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LITTLE LEAGUE INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds HARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION
  • Who funds THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Conservation Lands Foundation
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC
  • Who funds THE CONSERVATION ALLIANCE
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds SERIOUSFUN CHILDREN'S NETWORK
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC
  • Who funds ALLEGHENY COUNCIL TO IMPROVE OUR NEIGHBORHOODS-HOUSING INCORPORATED
  • Who funds NEW YORK JUNIOR TENNIS LEAGUE INC
  • Who funds SOCCER UNITY PROJECT INC
  • Who funds THE SANNEH FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Girls on the Run International IncNC77.9× affinity67 shared granteesties to 5 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Girls on the Run International Inc · Pga Tour First Tee Foundation Inc · World Golf Foundation Inc · Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return) · Womens Sports Foundation · Good Sports Inc · Laureus Sport for Good Foundation USA · The George W Bush Foundation · The Jcpenney Foundation · Round It Up America Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 200%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc46% of income from government
  • Active City Inc29% of income from government
  • Move United16% of income from government
  • Beyond Soccer Inc7% of income from government
  • Soccer Unity Project Inc6% of income from government
  • Girls On the Run Greater Boston4% of income from government
  • Franciscan Hospital for Children0% of income from government
  • Hartford Marathon Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
20get no government money at all
51report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph