How much did USA HOCKEY INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 51% of USA HOCKEY INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

showcaseguidelinesboysgirls camp

2020

guidelinesgirls campboys girlsnhl draftdraft ncaa

2021

—

2022

—

2023

collegiategoverning body

2024

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k4 grants · $31k
$10k–50k14 grants · $356k
$50k–250k11 grants · $949k
$250k+4 grants · $3.1M

$42,515

Median grant

States reached

$45M

Total assets

Largest grants

US HOCKEY LEAGUE$1,277,748
COLLEGE HOCKEY INC$775,000
NORTH AMERICAN HOCKEY LEAGUE$556,600
NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE$484,753
SERVING THE AMERICAN RINKS$125,000
MINNESOTA HOCKEY$121,930
MASSACHUSETTS HOCKEY$100,250
NEW YORK STATE AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION$98,933
MID-AMERICAN HOCKEY ASSOCIATION$90,182
ATLANTIC AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION$82,990
MICHIGAN AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION$82,930
CALIFORNIA AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION$67,568
NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT HOCKEY$67,337
AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ILLINOIS$61,542
POTOMAC VALLEY AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION$50,745

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 9%. 54% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$28M · 37 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.

37 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$28M

$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%

-2%

Still filing today

89%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Recreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CH
COLLEGE HOCKEY INC
7× · 2018–2024 · $4.3M · revenue +24% · 95% of their budget
NA
NORTH AMERICAN HOCKEY LEAGUE
7× · 2018–2024 · $3.3M · revenue +163%
MH
MINNESOTA HOCKEY
7× · 2018–2024 · $893k · revenue +51%

Funded once

AC
AMERICAN COLLEGIATE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC
one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -2%
US
UNITED STATES PREMIER HOCKEY LEAGUE
one grant, 2018 · $20k
CD
CENTRAL DISTRICT
one grant, 2018 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Woodland Amateur Hockey Association

Provide kids a safe environment to learn hockey, sportsmanship, teamwork adn other life skills.

Youth Development

Medway Amateur Hockey Association

Education

South Anchorage Hockey Association

Teaching ice hockey and life skills to youth of ages 5 to 18.

Recreation & Sports

Alexandria Area Hockey Association

The association provides an instructional hockey experience to children between the ages of 5 to 15. currently over 300 youth are involved.

Recreation & Sports

Mankato Area Hockey Association

Recreation & Sports

Kodiak Hockey League

The mission of khl is to provide a safe, fun, competitive environment, with an emphasis on sportsmanship and teamwork, where hockey players of all ages can develop skills.

Recreation & Sports

Leech Lake Area Amateur Hockey

To provide a youth hockey league for area children. to fund and manage the walker youth hockey program. the organization also funds and provides fiscal management for walker-hackensack-akeley high school hockey , mn school district 113

Recreation & Sports

Alaska Arctic Junior Ice Hockey

To foster national and/or international amateur sports competition within the meaning of 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code.

Recreation & Sports

Grand Rapids Amateur Hockey Assoc Inc

To encourage "fun & development and improve the standards of ice hockey in the grand rapids area; to conduct hockey games and tournaments and to select representatives of teams to participate in tournaments; to associate with other hockey…

Recreation & Sports

Stillwater Area Hockey Association

To promote and develop an inclusive, safe and fun hockey environment for all girls and boys who reside in school district 834.

—

Anoka Area Hockey Association Inc

Provide the youth of anoka area the opportunity to develop hockey skills, team play, and good sportsmanship.

Recreation & Sports

Minnetonka Youth Hockey Association

Youth hockey association

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid-West Amateur Hockey Association and the most unlike its peers is North American Hockey League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/40

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,525

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

35 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

34/35

Grantees still filing

30/35

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$14,529,385Recreation & Sports$13,046,340Community Improvement$875,000Youth Development$42,811

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

USA Hockey FoundationCO37.7× affinity15 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: USA Hockey Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation USA HOCKEY INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: COLLEGE HOCKEY INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~14 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 271436145 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on COLLEGE HOCKEY INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 14 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 95% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to USA Hockey Inc?

Find your warmest path to USA Hockey Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

USA HOCKEY INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

35 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to USA Hockey Inc?

More from the funding graph

USA HOCKEY INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

35 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to USA Hockey Inc?

More from the funding graph