Skip to content

Michigan · Nonprofit

CLARK PARK COALITION

CLARK PARK COALITION (Michigan) receives grants from 27 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,042,065 to it, the largest being RAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND ($250,000). 13 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$344k
Funders on record
27
Grants received
$1.0M
Net assets
$522k
13/27 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 51%
01What it does

What Clark Park Coalition does

Mission

Clark Park Coalition exists to provide an array of diverse, high-quality recreational, educational, social and mentoring programs for southwest detroit families promoting skills development which helps our youth grow into responsible, self-confident adults. Clark Park Coalition is a partner of the detroit recreational department.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. 2024 was an exciting year for clark park. In addition to our regular year- round programming which includes ice hockey and learn-to-skate activities for winter and baseball and softball for the summer months, the new park renovations allowed us to greatly expand our activities. Our new partnerships and collaborations also helped to enhance our offerings. Hundreds of youth ages five through 16 participated this summer in our popular baseball and softball programs. More than 20 youngsters were able to learn about and perfect their skills in lacrosse, a recently added sport that continued into the fall season. The winter season hosted more than 140 young people of all abilities on the ice rink doing everything from learning to skate to playing hockey. Our girls' hockey has more than doubled and continues to grow. The restoration of the park's playground and the addition of the popular splash pad drew hundreds more children to play in the water and enjoy the new swings, slides and sandbox. The addition of the the renovation of the courts allowed us to add not only new tennis courts, but pickle ball, basketball and volleyball. These are constantly in use, and the clark park staff was…

    $407,102 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $407,102.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($328k) Expenses 100 ($307k) Net assets 100 ($290k)2019 Revenue 132 ($434k) Expenses 110 ($339k) Net assets 203 ($588k)2020 Revenue 69 ($225k) Expenses 75 ($229k) Net assets 202 ($583k)2021 Revenue 70 ($228k) Expenses 83 ($254k) Net assets 193 ($557k)2022 Revenue 154 ($504k) Expenses 120 ($370k) Net assets 257 ($745k)2023 Revenue 125 ($408k) Expenses 158 ($484k) Net assets 231 ($669k)2024 Revenue 105 ($344k) Expenses 160 ($491k) Net assets 180 ($522k)
2017201920202021202220232024
Revenue (105)Expenses (160)Net assets (180)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $579k to $768k (+33%).

$290k
$621k
$612k
$579k
$768k
$698k
$535k
2017201920202021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 9% · 2019 19% · 2021 13% · 2022 15% · 2023 23% · 2024 35%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

97% of CLARK PARK COALITION’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (18% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 16,168 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$21k
’17
$95k
’19
−$4k
’20
−$26k
’21
$134k
’22
−$75k
’23
−$147k
’24
6.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

2017201920202021202220232024
Listed12111110121214
Joined··+2+1+3+0+7
No longer listed··22105
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 12 funders, grant income fell $115k → $91k.

4 of 27 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 41% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CLARK PARK COALITION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 24 of 27 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CLARK PARK COALITION has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 24% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

61% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CLARK PARK COALITION.

24%
largest funder
57%
top three
~7
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 89% · 2018 40% · 2019 67% · 2020 31% · 2021 56% · 2022 68% · 2023 33% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

47% of CLARK PARK COALITION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 48% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

87% of CLARK PARK COALITION's grant income comes from Michigan funders.

MI
NY
OH
CO
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Michigan out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $430k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

CLARK PARK COALITION is better cushioned than half of the 15,520 recreation & sports nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−43% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve6.2mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)1% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 15,520 recreation & sports nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like CLARK PARK COALITION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Michigan

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

83% of spending goes to programs.

Program 83%Management 14%Fundraising 3%

Governance

13
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MI

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CLARK PARK COALITION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CLARK PARK COALITION?
CLARK PARK COALITION (Michigan) receives grants from 27 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,042,065 to it, the largest being RAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND ($250,000). 13 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CLARK PARK COALITION have?
IRS filings report 27 organizations giving $1,042,065 in grants to CLARK PARK COALITION, 13 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CLARK PARK COALITION?
RAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $250,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CLARK PARK COALITION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Michigan. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Clark Park Coalition →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 27 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing