Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Together Rising

TOGETHER RISING exists to turn our collective heartbreak into effective action.

$5.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$830k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Crime & Legal$14MInternational$8.2MHealth$3.0MHuman Services$2.6MFood & Nutrition$1.7MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.4MCivil Rights$1.3MYouth Development$990kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 27 grants below total $5,060,914 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,419,364 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $358,450 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $76k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+6 grants · $3.3M
$100,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AL OTRO LADO$830,000
HOLLER HEALTH JUSTICE$800,000
OUT YOUTH$750,000
ANERA$331,629
MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE$331,628
LOOKING OUT FOUNDATION$305,905
KIDS IN NEED OF DEFENSE$236,306
NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT$230,000
NEW HOUR FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN - LI$100,000
GRO$100,000
ACTION AGAINST HUNGER USA$100,000
YEMEN RELIEF AND RECONSTRUCTION FOUNDATION$100,000
JASMYN$100,000
SHELTERBOX USA$100,000
NATIONAL CENTER OF YOUTH LAW$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $8.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ACCESS CALIFORNIA SERVICES: $75k → 10%ONE HEART WORLDWIDE: $100k → 10%VICTIMS FIRST: $240k → 14%DFW REFUGEE SERVICES: $50k → 14%CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER: $28k → 9%MONSOON ASIANS & PACIFIC ISLANDERS IN SOLIDARITY: $50k → 10%OUTMEMPHIS: $200k → 17%SISTERSONG: $149k → 13%COOPERATION JACKSON OF MISSISSIPPI: $100k → 23%ONE SIMPLE WISH: $25k → 11%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $250k → 15%MISSION EDGE SAN DIEGO: $50k → 11%THE SMILE TRUST: $121k → 15%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $315k → 14%ONE SIMPLE WISH: $20k → 11%SECOND STORY: $50k → 6%ETHIOPIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $150k → 7%SOLUTIONS IN HOMETOWN CONNECTIONS: $25k → 11%AFGHAN HEALTH INITIATIVE: $25k → 9%EMPOWERHER: $20k → 8%TIDES CENTER: $50k → 10%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $75k → 14%THE AFYA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $585k → 9%BETHANY HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $100k → 14%HAPPYPERIOD: $20k → 14%WHAT IF FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $50k → 14%NEW NEIGHBORS PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION: $25k → 17%AL OTRO LADO: $830k → 14%AL OTRO LADO: $785k → 14%SHELTERBOX: $275k → 14%CITY LIVING NY: $200k → 20%AL OTRO LADO: $772k → 14%CITY LIVING NY: $38k → 20%AL OTRO LADO: $696k → 14%TOGETHER AND FREE: $50k → 17%CITY LIVING NY: $32k → 20%AL OTRO LADO: $364k → 14%CENTER FOR FAMILY LIFE IN SUNSET PARK: $50k → 20%AL OTRO LADO: $250k → 14%NIDO DE ESPERANZA: $68k → 17%CENTER FOR FAMILY LIFE IN SUNSET PARK: $50k → 20%AL OTRO LADO: $240k → 14%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $50k → 17%RUTH'S REFUGE: $25k → 20%RUTH'S REFUGE: $22k → 20%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $50k → 17%BRIGID: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
NH
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 23% of Together Rising’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Together Risinglessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 34% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$23M · 45 repeat orgs$13M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

45 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
123

Total granted

$23M
$12M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+17%

Still filing today

100%
93%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthInternationalCivil RightsCrime & LegalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AO
    AL OTRO LADO
    7× · 2018–2024 · $3.9M · revenue +218% · 33% of their budget
  • DIRECT RELIEF
    6× · 2017–2022 · $2.6M · revenue +94%
  • JI
    JUSTICE IN MOTION INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +86% · 37% of their budget

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $900k · revenue +112%
  • TA
    THE AFYA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $585k · revenue -34%
  • FI
    FLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $487k · revenue +91%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Refugee Womens Alliance

ReWA is a non-profit, multi-ethnic organization that promotes inclusion, independence, personal leadership, and strong communities by providing refugee and immigrant women and their families with culturally and linguistically appropriate…

Human Services
2
Ayuda Inc

Ayuda's mission is to advocate for low-income immigrants through direct legal, social and language services, training and outreach in washington, d.c., maryland, and virginia. we envision a community where all immigrants succeed and thrive…

Human Services
3
Asylee Women Enterprise Inc

Asylee Women Enterprise (AWE), journeys with asylum seekers and other forced migrants as they navigate the immigration legal process, begin to heal from past trauma, and rebuild their lives in Baltimore.

International
4
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
5
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
6
El Refugio

El refugio inc empowers all persons affected by domestic and sexual violence by providing advocacy education and services in a safe and supportive environment.

Human Services
7
United States Association for Unhcr

USA for UNHCR protects and supports refugees by mobilizing resources, elevating awareness, and driving action through a network of engaged supporters.

International
8
Ascend Justice

Our mission is to empower individuals and families impacted by gender-based violence or the child welfare system to achieve safety and stability through holistic legal advocacy and systemic reform. we are working toward strong communities…

—
9
Asian Immigrant Women Advocates Inc

Asian Immigrant Women Advocates empowers low-income, limited English speaking immigrant women and youth through education, leadership development and civic participation programs.

Human Services
10
New American Pathways Inc

New american pathways is an atlanta based nonprofit with the mission of helping refugees and georgia thrive.

Human Services
11
Jubilee Immigration Advocates

Our mission is to reflect Gods intent for humanity, to live as a reconciled and and restored community. We stand in solidarity with immigrants by providing high quality, affordable immigration legal services and advocating for just…

Human Services
12
Vital Immigrant Defense Advocacy & Services

Vidas provides trauma-informed immigration legal advocacy and community wellness programs.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Zebra Youth Inc and the most unlike its peers is Indigenous Women Rising Indigeous Women Rising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLgbtq+ Community SupportChristian Missionary Organi…Pregnancy Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyEnvironmental Conservation …Domestic Violence ServicesFood Banks and PantriesHealth Access Advocacy and …Independent K-12 SchoolsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Affordable Housing Developm…Jewish Community Organizati…Affordable Housing Construc…Senior Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsYouth Development ServicesElementary Literacy TutoringMilitary Veterans SupportCancer Support ServicesAddiction Recovery ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community FoundationsImmigrant Worker Support
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%22%5–10yr19%27%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%5%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%39%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%13%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%3/177
the rest of the field
13%
240,393/1,819,388

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

170 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 170 of the 177 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

10
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
45
Early backer (in before they grew)
168/170
Grantees still filing
99/170
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AL OTRO LADO — $3,936,521 · Human ServicesAL OTRO LADOONE SPIRIT — $690,064 · Human ServicesONE SPIRITTHE AFYA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $585,000 · Human ServicesTHE AFYA FOUNDATION OF AMERIC…SHELTERBOX USA INC — $375,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS — $315,000 · Human Services+43 more — $3,457,840 · Human Services+43 moreDIRECT RELIEF — $2,645,245 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $739,835 · InternationalMIDDLE EAST CHILDRE…Yemen Relief and Reconstruction Foundation — $590,000 · InternationalYemen Relief and Re…BRAC USA INC — $350,000 · InternationalBRAC USA INCAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID — $331,629 · InternationalACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA — $250,000 · InternationalWomen for Afghan Women Inc — $250,000 · InternationalHEALING ART MISSIONS — $230,835 · International+7 more — $874,423 · International+7 moreJUSTICE IN MOTION INC — $1,893,000 · Crime & LegalJUSTICE IN MOTION …Immigrant Defenders Law Center — $1,036,980 · Crime & LegalImmigrant Defender…KIND INC — $919,906 · Crime & LegalKIND INCSAFE PASSAGE PROJECT CORPORATION — $526,000 · Crime & LegalSAFE PASSAGE PROJE…FLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC — $487,000 · Crime & LegalFLORENCE IMMIGRANT…Me Too International Inc — $300,000 · Crime & LegalEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $242,941 · Crime & Legal+4 more — $474,277 · Crime & Legal+4 moreNational Center for Youth Law — $1,456,705 · OtherNational Center for Youth …NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT — $309,000 · OtherLooking Out Foundation — $305,905 · OtherOut Youth Inc — $790,000 · OtherOut Youth Inc+64 more — $5,385,400 · Other+64 moreTHE PREEMPTIVE LOVE COALITION — $1,201,888 · HealthJAMAA BIRTH VILLAGE — $468,000 · HealthINTERSECTION OF CHANGE INC — $225,000 · HealthHOPE ON HAVEN HILL INC — $175,000 · HealthCOMMUNITIES ORGANIZING FOR HAITIAN ENGAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT — $100,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE GUEST HOUSE INC — $100,000 · HealthTEXAS DIAPER BANK — $100,000 · Health+8 more — $332,120 · HealthHOLLER HEALTH JUSTICE INC — $850,000 · Civil RightsREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $344,788 · Civil RightsNATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD INC — $230,000 · Civil RightsRespond Crisis Translation — $150,000 · Civil RightsJACKSONVILLE AREA SEXUAL MINORITY YOUTH NETWORK INC — $150,000 · Civil RightsIMMIGRATION EQUALITY — $100,000 · Civil Rights+7 more — $275,000 · Civil RightsTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION — $900,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $157,250 · EducationCOLLEGE SUMMIT INC — $50,000 · Education+4 more — $90,000 · Education
Human Services$9,359,425International$6,261,967Crime & Legal$5,880,104Other$8,247,010Health$2,702,008Civil Rights$2,099,788Education$1,197,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAL OTRO LADO — $3,936,521 over 7y, 33% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $2,645,245 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJUSTICE IN MOTION INC — $1,893,000 over 6y, 37% of budgetNational Center for Youth Law — $1,456,705 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetTHE PREEMPTIVE LOVE COALITION — $1,201,888 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetImmigrant Defenders Law Center — $1,036,980 over 2y, 13% of budgetKIND INC — $919,906 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION — $900,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHOLLER HEALTH JUSTICE INC — $850,000 over 2y, 40% of budgetOut Youth Inc — $790,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $739,835 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetONE SPIRIT — $690,064 over 5y, 41% of budgetYemen Relief and Reconstruction Foundation — $590,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetTHE AFYA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $585,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetSAFE PASSAGE PROJECT CORPORATION — $526,000 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC — $487,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetJAMAA BIRTH VILLAGE — $468,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC — $375,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetBRAC USA INC — $350,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $344,788 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID — $331,629 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS — $315,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetNORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT — $309,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetLooking Out Foundation — $305,905 over 1y, 18% of budgetMe Too International Inc — $300,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetOFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC — $270,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCITY LIVING NY INC — $269,242 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA — $250,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC — $250,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetEAST COAST MIGRANT HEAD START PROJECT — $250,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWomen for Afghan Women Inc — $250,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetKARAM FOUNDATION — $246,919 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $242,941 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVictims First Inc — $240,441 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC — $232,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetHEALING ART MISSIONS — $230,835 over 1y, 29% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD INC — $230,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetToo Young to Wed Inc — $225,000 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetINTERSECTION OF CHANGE INC — $225,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA KENTUCKY'S HEARTLAND INC — $215,566 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $211,800 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLEE INITIATIVE INC — $204,277 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetOUTMEMPHIS — $200,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH ROOTS REPRODUCTIVE ACTION — $185,826 over 1y, 46% of budgetALDEA - THE PEOPLES JUSTICE CENTER — $180,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetOUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL — $179,117 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHOPE ON HAVEN HILL INC — $175,000 over 1y, 19% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitabl…NEO Philanthropy IncBorealis PhilanthropyTides FoundationChoose Love IncNational Network of A…GofundmeorgRockefeller Philanthr…Solidaire Network IncWomen Donors NetworkGlobalgiving Foundati…Impactassetsinc
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC29.3× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · Tides Foundation · Choose Love Inc · National Network of Abortion Funds Inc · Gofundmeorg · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Solidaire Network Inc · Women Donors Network · Globalgiving Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Together Rising funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service Inc Dba Global Refuge — 100% of income from government
  • Intersection of Change Inc — 20% of income from government
  • Jacksonville Area Sexual Minority Youth Network Inc — 16% of income from government
  • Hilltown Village — 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
48report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Together Rising?

Find your warmest path to Together Rising through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 177 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines