· Public charity
Choose Love Inc
Support refugees, asylum seekers and those who have been internally displaced, primarily through an international, cross-sector network of predominantly locally-led projects; advocate for the rights of these persons through promoting awareness of the plight of those fleeing war, persecution and the effects of climate change across the…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 23 grants below total $1,939,161 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $9,196,094 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $7,256,933 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k11 grants · $207k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $857k
- $250k+2 grants · $875k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FWDus Education Fund Inc | $600,000 |
| American Near East Refugee Ai | $275,000 |
| King Hussein Cancer Foundatio | $150,000 |
| GoFundMeorg | $133,086 |
| The White Helmets Inc | $110,000 |
| The International Network for | $90,000 |
| Fund for Global Human Rights | $78,500 |
| Refugee Health Alliance | $65,000 |
| High Atlas Foundation | $60,575 |
| Fenix Ltd | $60,000 |
| Al Otro Lado Inc | $60,000 |
| Uplift Afghanistan Fund | $50,000 |
| Kooyrigs Inc | $40,000 |
| Solidarity Inc | $27,000 |
| Peace of Mind Association Inc | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $7.3M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: REFUGEE SUPPORT
Stated purpose: REFUGEE SUPPORT
Stated purpose: REFUGEE SUPPORT
Stated purpose: REFUGEE SUPPORT
Stated purpose: REFUGEE SUPPORT
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +7% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TVTHE VOICES PROJECT USA INC4× · 2019–2022 · $536k · revenue +27%
- RHREFUGEE HEALTH ALLIANCE5× · 2020–2024 · $380k · revenue +109%
- IRINTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT INC6× · 2019–2024 · $358k · revenue +82%
Funded once
- NUNOVA UKRAINEone grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue -45%
- OIOUTRIGHT INTERNATIONALone grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +10%
- TPTHE PARTNERSHIP FOR INCLUSIVE DISASTER STRATEGIESgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +97%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
USA for UNHCR protects and supports refugees by mobilizing resources, elevating awareness, and driving action through a network of engaged supporters.
Coalicion por Venezuela Inc is a non-profit federation that unities civil society organizations dedicated to defending and promoting promote human rights, democratic values, and the social and cultural freedoms of Venezuelans and other…
Provide services to in-transit migrant populations throughout their journeys and assist with resettlement processes of asylum seekers and migrants.
Refugee Solidarity Network protects the rights of people uprooted from their homes and strengthens the communities where they seek safety. In partnership with advocates and local stakeholders, we develop capacity in refugee host countries…
ReWA is a non-profit, multi-ethnic organization that promotes inclusion, independence, personal leadership, and strong communities by providing refugee and immigrant women and their families with culturally and linguistically appropriate…
Support refugees, asylum seekers and those who have been internally displaced, primarily through an international, cross-sector network of predominantly locally-led projects; advocate for the rights of these persons through promoting…
MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…
Women in Migration Network (WIMN), an international non-governmental organization, identifies and promotes human rights-based and feminist global migration policies. We lift up and support the experiences, voices and agency of all women in…
The Guernica Centre for International Justice represents the interests of victims in national and international legal proceedings, putting in place transnational accountability strategies that seek to maximize the protection of victims'…
We partner closely with community organizations, local nonprofits, resettlement agencies, religious institutions and passionate volunteers focused on helping refugees, asylum-seekers and humanitarian parolees resettle in Southern…
Rpi's mission is to partner with local non-gov organizations and others to strengthen protection and self-reliance among refugees and internally displaced persons near conflict zones.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Refugee Assistance Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Armadillos Search and Rescue O. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 11 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KARAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FWDUS EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE VOICES PROJECT USA INC ↗
- Who funds NOVA UKRAINE ↗
- Who funds OPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REFUGEE HEALTH ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds AL OTRO LADO ↗
- Who funds Global Response Management Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR STATE EFFECTIVENESS ↗
- Who funds ARTogether ↗
- Who funds Good Neighbor Settlement House Inc ↗
- Who funds OUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds NEST GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds KING HUSSEIN CANCER FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds Uplift Afghanistan Fund ↗
- Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
- Who funds Transgender Law Center ↗
- Who funds SOLIDARITY INC ↗
- Who funds BORDER ANGELS ↗
- Who funds HAITIAN BRIDGE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds MILES4MIGRANTS ↗
- Who funds Women for Afghan Women Inc ↗
- Who funds THE WHITE HELMETS INC ↗
- Who funds THE PARTNERSHIP FOR INCLUSIVE DISASTER STRATEGIES ↗
- Who funds SYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE INTERNATIONAL NETWORK FOR AID RELIEF AND ASSISTANCE INC ↗
- Who funds JUSTICE IN MOTION INC ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds ALL FOR ARMENIA ↗
- Who funds Respond Crisis Translation ↗
- Who funds PEACE OF MIND ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds HIGH ATLAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BORDER KINDNESS ↗
- Who funds FENIX LTD ↗
- Who funds ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds BRAVE GENERATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fwdus Education Fund Inc · Dunn Family Charitable Foundation · Tides Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Rockefeller Brothers Fund Inc · Gofundmeorg · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Together Rising · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Hispanics in Philanthropy · The Ford Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Choose Love Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Choose Love Inc?
Find your warmest path to Choose Love Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.