Skip to content
Tipping Point Community at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Tipping Point Community

We build community to advance the most promising poverty-fighting solutions.

$26M
Granted FY2025still arriving
108
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$128MEducation$68MHealth$32MEmployment$29MHuman Services$24MYouth Development$12MCrime & Legal$10MPhilanthropy$8.6MOther$0
02FY2025 · 108 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k21 grants · $504k
  • $50k–250k36 grants · $4.3M
  • $250k+51 grants · $21M
$206,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$87M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES$2,450,000
REGENTS OF UCSF$945,000
FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH$850,000
JOBTRAIN$800,882
INSTITUTE ON AGING$750,000
LIFEMOVES$600,000
JVS$540,000
COLLEGE TRACK$467,500
LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES$465,000
YEAR UP$450,000
BAY AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES$450,000
MISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY$450,000
CANAL ALLIANCE$440,000
LIFE LEARNING ACADEMY$421,150
BEYOND 12$420,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $45.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ON THE MOVE: $1.8M → 9%CALIFORNIA CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $300k → 10%CHILD WELFARE INNOVATION: $902k → 16%ON THE MOVE: $821k → 9%CHILD WELFARE INNOVATION: $451k → 16%AMIGOS DE GUADALUPE CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT: $363k → 8%ON THE MOVE: $705k → 9%KIDANGO: $370k → 10%KIDANGO: $350k → 10%KIDANGO: $310k → 10%KIDANGO: $300k → 10%BILL WILSON CENTER: $416k → 8%LA LUZ CENTER: $3.0M → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $1.6M → 8%INSTITUTE ON AGING: $750k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $775k → 10%BEYOND EMANCIPATION: $450k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $1.5M → 10%TIDES CENTER: $400k → 10%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $979k → 10%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $850k → 10%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $845k → 10%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $830k → 10%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $750k → 10%First Place for Youth: $750k → 10%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $742k → 10%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $671k → 10%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $600k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $3.4M → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $2.5M → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $907k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $856k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $790k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $710k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $600k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $600k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $540k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $465k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $456k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $425k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $400k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $400k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $400k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $375k → 10%Compass Family Services: $375k → 10%Larkin Street Youth Services: $350k → 10%MISSION NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS: $400k → 10%MNC INSPIRING SUCCESS: $350k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DC
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$272M · 140 repeat orgs$50M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

140 repeat relationships: 68 still active in FY2025, 72 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

140
159

Total granted

$272M
$45M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+22%

Still filing today

90%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    Larkin Street Youth Services
    9× · 2017–2025 · $8.0M · revenue +90%
  • FP
    FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7.0M · revenue +78%
  • CF
    COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6.5M · revenue +283%

Funded once

  • RC
    ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SANTA ROSA
    one grant, 2018 · $5.8M
  • RH
    ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $5.0M · revenue +19%
  • SR
    SANTA ROSA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS
    one grant, 2018 · $4.3M · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
3
California School-Age Consortium Inc

The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…

—
4
Bay Area Community Services Housing Corp

Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.

Housing & Shelter
5
Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco Inc

The Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco is dedicated to combating the displacement crisis gripping our city by building the power of working-class tenants of color to take on the real estate industry and win housing justice for all.…

Education
6
San Francisco Casa

San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…

Civil Rights
7
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
8
Sf Partnership

SF Partnership is an organization comprised of SF's leading employers dedicated to supporting an equitable, resilient, and vibrant economy shared by all people working and living in San Francisco. Through education, advocacy, and research,…

—
9
Public Advocates Inc

For more than five decades, public advocates has challenged the systemic causes of poverty and racial discrimination by strengthening community voices in public policy and achieving tangible legal victories advancing education, housing,…

—
10
East Bay Agency for Children

For more than 70 years, East Bay Agency for Children continues to improve the well-being of children, youth and families by reducing the impact of trauma and social inequalities.

Health
11
Housing Trust Silicon Valley

Our mission at housing trust silicon valley, is to use transformative housing finance and public and private partnerships to create more equitable and affordable communities.

Housing & Shelter
12
Unitedly

Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Compass Family Services; the most unlike its peers is Making Waves Foundation Inc Aka Making Waves Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

327 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 327 of the 353 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

20
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
63
Early backer (in before they grew)
320/327
Grantees still filing
210/327
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOMES FOR THE HOMELESS FUND: $49,996,194 · OtherHOMES FOR THE HOMELESS FUNDUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $13,165,542 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOLIFEMOVES: $6,076,390 · OtherROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SANTA ROSA: $5,750,000 · OtherROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $5,000,000 · Other+78 more: $64,164,683 · Other+78 moreBRILLIANT CORNERS: $14,411,000 · EducationBRILLIANT CORNERSKIPP BAY AREA SCHOOLS: $5,715,000 · EducationKIPP BAY AREA SCHOOLSTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $5,351,576 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF…YEAR UP INC: $5,170,000 · EducationYEAR UP INCASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $4,475,000 · EducationASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLSCALIBER PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3,886,200 · EducationCALIBER PUBLIC SCHOOLSROCKETSHIP EDUCATION: $3,650,000 · EducationCOLLEGE TRACK: $3,192,500 · EducationBEYOND 12 EDUCATION INC: $3,098,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE: $2,895,000 · Education+23 more: $17,443,633 · Education+23 moreLarkin Street Youth Services: $8,017,550 · Human ServicesLarkin Street Y…FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $7,017,600 · Human ServicesFIRST PLACE FOR…COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $6,480,916 · Human ServicesCOMPASS FAMILY …ON THE MOVE: $3,341,740 · Human ServicesON THE MOVELA LUZ CENTER: $3,015,000 · Human ServicesLA LUZ CENTERTIDES CENTER: $2,220,250 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $1,605,543 · Human ServicesKidango Inc: $1,580,000 · Human ServicesChild Welfare Innovation Inc: $1,562,281 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Association of the East Bay: $1,517,500 · Human Services+18 more: $8,627,646 · Human Services+18 moreCOMMUNITY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP: $5,828,600 · Housing & ShelterBURBANK HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $4,545,000 · Housing & ShelterSHELTER INC: $3,946,100 · Housing & ShelterContra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Inc: $1,395,000 · Housing & ShelterNON-PROFIT HOUSING ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,226,000 · Housing & ShelterENTERPRISE COMMUNITY LOAN FUND INC: $1,175,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW DOOR VENTURES FKA GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY INC: $1,018,471 · Housing & ShelterHomeward Bound of Marin: $734,480 · Housing & Shelter+7 more: $2,144,830 · Housing & ShelterSANTA ROSA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $4,250,000 · HealthHomeless Prenatal Program Inc: $3,290,900 · HealthALIADOS HEALTH: $2,850,000 · HealthNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $2,127,300 · HealthWESTCOAST CHILDREN'S CLINIC: $1,775,000 · HealthALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $1,003,500 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF SAN MATEO COUNTY: $655,000 · Health+10 more: $2,955,000 · HealthJOBTRAIN INC: $4,365,882 · EmploymentOPPORTUNITY JUNCTION INC: $2,191,032 · EmploymentUPWARDLY GLOBAL: $1,627,000 · EmploymentGROWTH SECTOR COMPANY: $1,261,800 · EmploymentCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC: $1,107,500 · EmploymentWTIA WORKFORCE INSTITUTE: $950,000 · EmploymentTHE BREAD PROJECT: $630,000 · EmploymentCONSERVATION CORPS NORTH BAY INC: $500,000 · EmploymentYOUTH EMPLOYMENT PARTNERSHIP INC: $445,000 · Employment+1 more: $250,000 · EmploymentJohn Burton Advocates for Youth: $2,988,572 · Youth DevelopmentFRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH INC: $1,774,117 · Youth DevelopmentONEGOAL: $1,483,600 · Youth DevelopmentBRAVEN INC: $1,328,500 · Youth DevelopmentIMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW INC: $1,155,050 · Youth DevelopmentBOOKER T WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER: $955,000 · Youth DevelopmentIMENTOR INC: $690,000 · Youth DevelopmentESQ Apprentice Inc: $686,500 · Youth DevelopmentRYSE INC: $605,755 · Youth Development3RD STREET YOUTH CENTER AND CLINIC: $571,251 · Youth Development+4 more: $828,800 · Youth Development
Other$144,152,809Education$69,287,909Human Services$44,986,026Housing & Shelter$22,013,481Health$18,906,700Employment$13,328,214Youth Development$13,067,145

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRILLIANT CORNERS: $14,411,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services: $8,017,550 over 9y, 11% of budgetFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $7,017,600 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $6,480,916 over 9y, 5.6% of budgetLIFEMOVES: $6,076,390 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP: $5,828,600 over 9y, 3.8% of budgetKIPP BAY AREA SCHOOLS: $5,715,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $5,351,576 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYEAR UP INC: $5,170,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $5,000,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetBURBANK HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $4,545,000 over 3y, 26% of budgetASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $4,475,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetJOBTRAIN INC: $4,365,882 over 9y, 14% of budgetSANTA ROSA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $4,250,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetRUBICON PROGRAMS INC: $4,085,000 over 7y, 8.3% of budgetSHELTER INC: $3,946,100 over 9y, 4.8% of budgetCALIBER PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3,886,200 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetROCKETSHIP EDUCATION: $3,650,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetBay Area Community Services Inc: $3,488,066 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetON THE MOVE: $3,341,740 over 3y, 23% of budgetHomeless Prenatal Program Inc: $3,290,900 over 9y, 5.4% of budgetCOLLEGE TRACK: $3,192,500 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetJEWISH VOCATIONAL & CAREER COUNSELING SERVICE: $3,137,863 over 7y, 4.2% of budgetBEYOND 12 EDUCATION INC: $3,098,000 over 9y, 11% of budgetCANAL ALLIANCE: $3,040,516 over 9y, 5.9% of budgetLA LUZ CENTER: $3,015,000 over 2y, 84% of budgetJohn Burton Advocates for Youth: $2,988,572 over 5y, 42% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE: $2,895,000 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetALIADOS HEALTH: $2,850,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $2,250,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $2,220,250 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetOPPORTUNITY JUNCTION INC: $2,191,032 over 9y, 13% of budgetNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $2,127,300 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetLife Learning Academy: $2,120,040 over 7y, 12% of budgetPIVOTAL CONNECTIONS: $1,900,000 over 4y, 35% of budgetPARENTCHILD INC: $1,810,000 over 7y, 8.2% of budgetWESTCOAST CHILDREN'S CLINIC: $1,775,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetFRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH INC: $1,774,117 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetBAY AREA LEGAL AID: $1,754,500 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetNational Center for Youth Law: $1,725,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetMISSION ASSET FUND: $1,701,000 over 4y, 8.8% of budgetUPWARDLY GLOBAL: $1,627,000 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $1,605,543 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetThe Education Trust Inc: $1,586,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetKidango Inc: $1,580,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetChild Welfare Innovation Inc: $1,562,281 over 3y, 26% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of the East Bay: $1,517,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetONEGOAL: $1,483,600 over 7y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRILLIANT CORNERS ↗
  • Who funds Larkin Street Youth Services ↗
  • Who funds FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds LIFEMOVES ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds KIPP BAY AREA SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BURBANK HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds JOBTRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA ROSA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds RUBICON PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIBER PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds ROCKETSHIP EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds Bay Area Community Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds ON THE MOVE ↗
  • Who funds Homeless Prenatal Program Inc ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE TRACK ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH VOCATIONAL & CAREER COUNSELING SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND 12 EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CANAL ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds LA LUZ CENTER ↗
  • Who funds John Burton Advocates for Youth ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE ↗
  • Who funds ALIADOS HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY JUNCTION INC ↗
  • Who funds NURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds Life Learning Academy ↗
  • Who funds PIVOTAL CONNECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds PARENTCHILD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco Fou…Crankstart FoundationUnited Way of the Bay…East Bay Community Fo…McNabb FoundationKaiser Foundation Hos…Bothin FoundationThe Sobrato Family Fo…The James Irvine Foun…Marin Community Found…Stupski FoundationThe California Endowm…
The San Francisco FoundationCA113.5× affinity154 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Crankstart Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area · East Bay Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Bothin Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Stupski Foundation · The California Endowment

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tipping Point Community funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tipping Point Community. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Enterprise Community Loan Fund Inc: 18% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Citizen Schools Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
90report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 353 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tipping Point’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home