Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The William C Bannerman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$442k
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$904kEnvironment$882kHuman Services$325kArts & Culture$261kYouth Development$216kHealth$209kAnimals$208kFood & Nutrition$182kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $62k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $381k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY$25,000
PARA LOS NINOS$25,000
GRAMEEN AMERICA$25,000
READING PARTNERS$25,000
FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH$25,000
CAMINO NUEVO PUEBLO NUEVO$22,500
UPWARD BOUND HOUSE$20,000
SCHOOL ON WHEELS$20,000
HOLLYWOOD FOOD COALITION$20,000
YOUNG AND HEALTHY$20,000
ARTS BRIDGING THE GAP$17,500
Individual grant recipient$17,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
FRIENDS OF BALLONA WETLANDS$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $178k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $25k → 10%VOLUNTEER COLLECTIVE: $5k → 14%KARSH CENTER: $10k → 14%VALLEY FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 14%Sanctuary of Hope: $5k → 14%VOLUNTEER COLLECTIVE: $5k → 14%VOLUNTEER COLLECTIVE: $5k → 14%NORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES: $10k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $10k → 14%FOOD ON FOOT: $5k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL AT DOLORES MISSION: $15k → 14%FOOD ON FOOT: $5k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL AT DOLORES MISSION: $10k → 14%FOOD ON FOOT: $2k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $25k → 14%FOOD ON FOOT: $1k → 14%YOUNG EISNER SCHOLARS: $10k → 14%PROJECT ROPA: $10k → 14%PROJECT ROPA: $5k → 14%NATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINE: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
WA
IL
NY
OR
CA
VA
MD
AZ
DC
LA
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.8M · 82 repeat orgs$907k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

82 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 65 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

82
79

Total granted

$2.8M
$677k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+25%

Still filing today

73%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $230k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $146k · revenue +127%
  • HL
    HIGHTECH LA
    2× · 2019–2020 · $105k · revenue +62%
  • H
    Human-I-T
    5× · 2018–2024 · $98k · revenue +750%

Funded once

  • AH
    ARTS HIGH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • P4
    PEACE 4 KIDSgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +28%
  • NV
    NEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles Conservation Corps

The la conservation corps creates equitable opportunities for young people to build resilience in themselves, their communities and the environment through a program of work, education and support.

Employment
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
Los Angeles Conservancy

The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.

Arts & Culture
4
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
5
California Coastkeeper dba California Coastkeeper Alliance

California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.

Environment
6
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
7
Active San Gabriel Valley

Active San Gabriel Valley (ActiveSGV) is a community-based environmental advocacy and public health non-profit organization. Our mission is to promote a more sustainable, equitable, and livable San Gabriel Valley.

Community Improvement
8
Los Padres Forestwatch Inc

Los padres forestwatch protects the los padres national forest and the carrizo plain national monument through education, advocacy, and when necessary, legal action for the benefit of our communities, climate and future generations.

Environment
9
California Ocean Science Trust

California ocean science trust (ost) is a non-profit organization dedicated to accelerating progress towards a healthy and productive ocean future for california. created by state legislation, ost bridges the gap between cutting-edge…

Environment
10
Parks California

As california state parks' statutory non-profit partner, we have a clear mission - to help strengthen parks and inspire all people to experience these extraordinary places.

Environment
11
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
12
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young & Healthy and the most unlike its peers is Saturday Night Bath Concert Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr15%8%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr18%45%20–35yr12%20%35–55yr13%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr18%38%20–35yr12%30%35–55yr13%11%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%1/121
the rest of the field
14%
12,279/89,305

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

119 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 119 of the 179 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
35
Early backer (in before they grew)
116/119
Grantees still filing
83/119
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HIGH TECH HIGH-LA — $152,000 · OtherHIGH TECH HIGH-LAHuman-I-T — $97,500 · OtherONEGENERATION — $92,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $70,000 · OtherFOOD FINDERS INC — $80,000 · Other+103 more — $1,379,000 · Other+103 moreHIGHTECH LA — $105,000 · EducationHIGHTECH LASCHOOL ON WHEELS INC — $75,000 · EducationSCHOOL ON WHEELS …ECHOES OF HOPE — $60,000 · EducationECHOES OF HOPEHarmony Project — $57,500 · EducationHarmony Project826LA — $55,000 · Education826LAREADING PARTNERS — $55,000 · EducationREADING PARTNERSCAMINO NUEVO CHARTER ACADEMY — $45,000 · EducationCAMINO NUEVO CHAR…CRETE ACADEMY — $30,000 · EducationACCESS BOOKS — $25,000 · EducationNEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC — $20,000 · EducationPUENTE LEARNING CENTER — $20,000 · EducationThe Climate Center — $20,000 · Education+3 more — $25,000 · EducationRainforest Action Network — $135,000 · EnvironmentRainforest A…TRUSTEES FOR ALASKA — $80,000 · EnvironmentTRUSTEES FOR…COOK INLETKEEPER — $28,500 · EnvironmentCOOK INLETKE…COMMUNITIES FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT — $23,500 · EnvironmentCOMMUNITIES …ALASKA MARINE COMMUNITY COALITION — $21,500 · EnvironmentALASKA MARIN…SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $20,000 · EnvironmentGLASSROOTS — $15,000 · Environment+7 more — $57,500 · Environment+7 moreCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $146,000 · AnimalsCENTER FO…SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY — $50,000 · AnimalsSEA SHEPH…FRIENDS OF CABRILLO AQUARIUM — $41,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS O…WILDAID INC — $20,000 · AnimalsWILDAID I…Animal Samaritans — $20,000 · AnimalsAnimal Sa…+3 more — $25,000 · Animals+3 moreSAVING INNOCENCE INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesPARA LOS NINOS — $25,000 · Human ServicesProyecto Pastoral — $25,000 · Human ServicesFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH — $25,000 · Human ServicesPEACE 4 KIDS — $20,000 · Human ServicesVOLUNTEER COLLECTIVE — $15,000 · Human ServicesProject Ropa — $15,000 · Human ServicesFOOD ON FOOT — $12,500 · Human ServicesYoung Eisner Scholars — $10,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesValley Family Center — $10,000 · Human ServicesNORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES — $10,000 · Human ServicesKARSH FAMILY SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER INC — $10,000 · Human Services+2 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT ANGEL FOOD — $29,500 · HealthThe Fistula Foundation — $27,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES — $25,000 · HealthYOUNG & HEALTHY — $20,000 · HealthWESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER — $20,000 · HealthABORTION CARE NETWORK — $20,000 · HealthPlanned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc — $15,000 · HealthCROSSROADS INC — $15,000 · Health+4 more — $13,000 · HealthBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR — $70,000 · Youth DevelopmentADELANTE YOUTH ALLIANCE — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentSTUDENTS RUN AMERICA — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentCONSERVATION CORPS OF LONG BEACH — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOLLENBECK POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SANTA MONICA INC — $10,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,870,500Education$592,500Environment$401,000Animals$302,000Human Services$237,500Health$185,000Youth Development$145,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $146,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetRainforest Action Network — $135,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHIGHTECH LA — $105,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetHuman-I-T — $97,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetONEGENERATION — $92,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTRUSTEES FOR ALASKA — $80,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetFOOD FINDERS INC — $80,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC — $75,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR — $70,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetECHOES OF HOPE — $60,000 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetHarmony Project — $57,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budget826LA — $55,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetREADING PARTNERS — $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY — $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME — $45,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCAMINO NUEVO CHARTER ACADEMY — $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJVS SOCAL — $45,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF BALLONA WETLANDS — $45,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF CABRILLO AQUARIUM — $41,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetHOLLYWOOD FOOD COALITION — $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSAVING INNOCENCE INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCENTER FOR THE PACIFIC-ASIAN FAMILY INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCRETE ACADEMY — $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD — $29,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOOK INLETKEEPER — $28,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation — $27,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPARA LOS NINOS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPowerMyLearning Inc — $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetProyecto Pastoral — $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetACCESS BOOKS — $25,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION — $24,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT — $23,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetALASKA MARINE COMMUNITY COALITION — $21,500 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetADELANTE YOUTH ALLIANCE — $20,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetPEACE 4 KIDS — $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSTUDENTS RUN AMERICA — $20,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPUENTE LEARNING CENTER — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWILDAID INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG & HEALTHY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLOS ANGELES WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL AND TOWN HALL — $20,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Samaritans — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Rainforest Action Network ↗
  • Who funds HIGHTECH LA ↗
  • Who funds Human-I-T ↗
  • Who funds ONEGENERATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES FOR ALASKA ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FINDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR ↗
  • Who funds ECHOES OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Harmony Project ↗
  • Who funds 826LA ↗
  • Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME ↗
  • Who funds CAMINO NUEVO CHARTER ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds JVS SOCAL ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BALLONA WETLANDS ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CABRILLO AQUARIUM ↗
  • Who funds HOLLYWOOD FOOD COALITION ↗
  • Who funds SAVING INNOCENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR THE PACIFIC-ASIAN FAMILY INC ↗
  • Who funds CRETE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ANGEL FOOD ↗
  • Who funds COOK INLETKEEPER ↗
  • Who funds The Fistula Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PARA LOS NINOS ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds PowerMyLearning Inc ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ahmanson Foundati…The Annenberg Foundat…The Ralph M Parsons F…California Community …The Rose Hills Founda…Weingart FoundationThe Green FoundationElbridge Stuart Found…S Mark Taper Foundati…Liberty Hill Foundati…Joseph Drown Foundati…United Way Inc
The Ahmanson FoundationCA69.5× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ahmanson Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Green Foundation · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · S Mark Taper Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · Joseph Drown Foundation · United Way Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The William C Bannerman Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    36report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The William C Bannerman Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The William C Bannerman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 179 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines