· Private foundation
Hostetlerwrigley Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EVERGLADES FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| NEW MUSEUM | $150,000 |
| SERPENTINE AMERICAS FOUNDATION | $147,200 |
| VISIONARY WOMEN | $103,645 |
| NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS | $100,000 |
| NORTON MUSEUM OF ART | $95,000 |
| LOST TREE VILLAGE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| MERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER | $50,000 |
| OPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC INC | $50,000 |
| MAYSLES INSTITUTE INC | $50,000 |
| NEW BEGINNINGS APFV | $50,000 |
| CARING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| KANSAS ABORTION FUND | $25,000 |
| HOPE FOR DEPRESSION RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| ST MARK'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $756k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NMNew Museum of Contemporary Art5× · 2020–2024 · $910k · revenue +119%
THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC4× · 2019–2024 · $750k · revenue +226%
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC3× · 2020–2022 · $650k · revenue +40%
Funded once
- KBKING BAUDOUIN FOUNDATION UNITEone grant, 2021 · $100k
- ARACHIEVEMENT REWARDS FOR COLLEGE SCIENTISTS INCone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +12%
- KUKIVA USER FUNDS LLCone grant, 2020 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)
The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.
The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…
The american federation of arts initiates and organizes a national and international program of art exhibitions, publications, and educational activities to benefit the museum community and enrich the public's experience and understanding…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.
Established in 1971, the mission of the new york foundation for the arts (nyfa) is to empower artists in all disciplines, as well as cultural workers, to achieve success on their own terms by providing critical support, resources, and…
Via art fund is a nonprofit organization where art patrons join forces as partners in a new model of philanthropy to support visionary initiatives in art.
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Foundation for Advancement in the Arts Inc and the most unlike its peers is Skystone Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds New Museum of Contemporary Art ↗
- Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds Western Pennsylvania Fund for Choic ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM NETWORK USA INC ↗
- Who funds Lost Tree Village Charitable Foundation ↗
- Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS APFV INC ↗
- Who funds NORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds ANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds LIFTFUND INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds VISIONARY WOMEN ↗
- Who funds ACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds MERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds KANSAS ABORTION FUND ↗
- Who funds LIFEWAY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVEMENT REWARDS FOR COLLEGE SCIENTISTS INC ↗
- Who funds THE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC ↗
- Who funds E4E RELIEF LLC ↗
- Who funds CRISIS TEXT LINE INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds United States Artists Inc ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds National Women's Health Network ↗
- Who funds Stand Together Foundation ↗
- Who funds A BETTER BALANCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE JED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CARING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds MAYSLES INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Skystone Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hostetlerwrigley Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
- The Institute of Contemporary Art Inc — 1% of income from government
- National Foundation for Advancement in the Arts Inc — 0% of income from government
- Place of Hope Inc — 0% of income from government
- Global Empowerment Mission Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hostetlerwrigley Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Hostetlerwrigley Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.