Skip to content
Hostetlerwrigley Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Hostetlerwrigley Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$2.4MHealth$2.2MEnvironment$750kPhilanthropy$615kInternational$536kCivil Rights$500kCommunity Improvement$370kCrime & Legal$360kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.1M
$50,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EVERGLADES FOUNDATION$200,000
NEW MUSEUM$150,000
SERPENTINE AMERICAS FOUNDATION$147,200
VISIONARY WOMEN$103,645
NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS$100,000
NORTON MUSEUM OF ART$95,000
LOST TREE VILLAGE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$75,000
NEW BEGINNINGS APFV$50,000
MAYSLES INSTITUTE INC$50,000
MERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER$50,000
CARING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$50,000
OPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC INC$50,000
KANSAS ABORTION FUND$25,000
HOPE FOR DEPRESSION RESEARCH FOUNDATION$25,000
ST MARK'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $756k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VISIONARY WOMEN: $104k → 14%FREEDOM NETWORK USA: $150k → 14%CARING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%VISIONARY WOMEN: $72k → 14%FREEDOM NETWORK USA: $150k → 14%VISIONARY WOMEN: $447 → 14%FREEDOM NETWORK USA: $100k → 14%FREEDOM NETWORK USA: $100k → 14%START SMALL THINK BIG: $20k → 17%PLACE OF HOPE: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
AZ
KS
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.3M · 29 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
36

Total granted

$7.3M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+18%

Still filing today

90%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEducationPublic Safety & DisasterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    New Museum of Contemporary Art
    5× · 2020–2024 · $910k · revenue +119%
  • THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2019–2024 · $750k · revenue +226%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $650k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • KB
    KING BAUDOUIN FOUNDATION UNITE
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • AR
    ACHIEVEMENT REWARDS FOR COLLEGE SCIENTISTS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +12%
  • KU
    KIVA USER FUNDS LLC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
3
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
4
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
5
The American Federation of Arts Inc

The american federation of arts initiates and organizes a national and international program of art exhibitions, publications, and educational activities to benefit the museum community and enrich the public's experience and understanding…

Arts & Culture
6
Berggruen Institute
Education
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
10
New York Foundation for the Arts Inc

Established in 1971, the mission of the new york foundation for the arts (nyfa) is to empower artists in all disciplines, as well as cultural workers, to achieve success on their own terms by providing critical support, resources, and…

Arts & Culture
11
Via Art Fund Inc

Via art fund is a nonprofit organization where art patrons join forces as partners in a new model of philanthropy to support visionary initiatives in art.

Arts & Culture
12
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Foundation for Advancement in the Arts Inc; the most unlike its peers is Skystone Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/60
Grantees still filing
40/60
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MY LIFE MY CHOICE: $460,000 · OtherMY LIFE MY CHOICELost Tree Village Charitable Foundation: $365,000 · OtherLost Tree Village Charitable Foundati…SERPENTINE AMERICAS FOUNDATION: $316,247 · OtherSERPENTINE AMERICAS FOUNDATIONTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS: $250,000 · OtherTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE A…KING BAUDOUIN FOUNDATION UNITE: $100,000 · OtherLIFEWAY NETWORK INC: $100,000 · OtherKIVA USER FUNDS LLC: $100,000 · OtherNEW BEGINNINGS APFV INC: $300,000 · OtherNEW BEGINNINGS APFV INCACHIEVEMENT REWARDS FOR COLLEGE SCIENTISTS INC: $100,000 · OtherMERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER: $130,000 · Other+26 more: $657,258 · Other+26 moreNew Museum of Contemporary Art: $910,000 · Arts & CultureNew Museum of Contempor…NORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $255,000 · Arts & CultureNORTON MUSEUM OF ART IN…ANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER: $202,415 · Arts & CultureANDERSON RANCH ARTS CEN…THE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES: $142,500 · Arts & CultureTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE …THE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureTHE INSTITUTE OF CONTEM…United States Artists Inc: $75,000 · Arts & Culture+10 more: $159,000 · Arts & Culture+10 moreTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $750,000 · EnvironmentTHE EVERGLADES FO…Western Pennsylvania Fund for Choic: $600,000 · EnvironmentWestern Pennsylva…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $650,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHO…OPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC INC: $200,000 · HealthOPEN ARMS FREE C…KANSAS ABORTION FUND: $125,000 · HealthKANSAS ABORTION …CRISIS TEXT LINE INC: $100,000 · HealthCRISIS TEXT LINE…National Women's Health Network: $50,000 · HealthTHE JED FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Health+4 more: $100,000 · Health+4 moreFREEDOM NETWORK USA INC: $500,000 · Human ServicesFREEDOM N…VISIONARY WOMEN: $176,425 · Human ServicesVISIONARY…CARING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesCARING CO…+2 more: $30,000 · Human ServicesGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC: $237,032 · Public Safety & DisasterE4E RELIEF LLC: $100,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Public Safety & DisasterLIFTFUND INC: $200,000 · Community ImprovementACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND INC: $150,000 · Community Improvement
Other$2,878,505Arts & Culture$1,843,915Environment$1,350,000Health$1,275,000Human Services$756,425Public Safety & Disaster$352,032Community Improvement$350,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNew Museum of Contemporary Art: $910,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $750,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $650,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWestern Pennsylvania Fund for Choic: $600,000 over 5y, 34% of budgetFREEDOM NETWORK USA INC: $500,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetLost Tree Village Charitable Foundation: $365,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS APFV INC: $300,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetNORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $255,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS: $250,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC: $237,032 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER: $202,415 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetLIFTFUND INC: $200,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC INC: $200,000 over 3y, 8.3% of budgetVISIONARY WOMEN: $176,425 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND INC: $150,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES: $142,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER: $130,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKANSAS ABORTION FUND: $125,000 over 5y, 23% of budgetLIFEWAY NETWORK INC: $100,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetACHIEVEMENT REWARDS FOR COLLEGE SCIENTISTS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCRISIS TEXT LINE INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUnited States Artists Inc: $75,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNational Women's Health Network: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetStand Together Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA BETTER BALANCE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCARING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYSLES INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetSkystone Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOXBRIDGE ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR DEPRESSION RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTART SMALL THINK BIG INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew Wave Artist Residency Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT IN THE ARTS INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Cha…Jewish Communal FundSilicon Valley Commun…WK Kellogg FoundationRockefeller Philanthr…National Philanthropi…The Ayco Charitable F…Gs Donor Advised Phil…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…The Blackbaud Giving …Donor Advised Charita…
The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY18.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hostetlerwrigley Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hostetlerwrigley Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • The Institute of Contemporary Art Inc: 1% of income from government
  • National Foundation for Advancement in the Arts Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Place of Hope Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Global Empowerment Mission Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hostetlerwrigley Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Hostetlerwrigley Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hostetlerwrigley’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home