· Private foundation
The Virginia Wellington Cabot Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k33 grants · $88k
- $10k–50k67 grants · $1.4M
- $50k–250k8 grants · $539k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TIDES FOUNDATION | $133,151 |
| VINFEN CORPORATION | $70,000 |
| HURRICANE ISLAND FOUNDATION | $65,900 |
| SAFETY TEAM INC | $59,000 |
| GREENWICH ACADEMY INC | $55,564 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $55,000 |
| HANLEY CENTER FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| TUBA CITY HUMANE SOCIETY | $50,000 |
| MULTIFAITH ALLIANCE | $45,000 |
| PRISON BOOK PROGRAM | $40,000 |
| PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY | $40,000 |
| HURRICANE ISLAND OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL | $40,000 |
| US MEXICO FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES | $40,000 |
| CHARLOTTESVILLE BALLET | $35,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $759k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
162 repeat relationships — 74 still active in FY2024, 88 since wound down; 31 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $460k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- THTHE HURRICANE ISLAND FOUNDATION6× · 2019–2024 · $236k · revenue +65%
VINFEN CORPORATION6× · 2019–2024 · $186k · revenue +76%- FNFAMILY NURTURING CENTER OF MASSACHUSETTS INC6× · 2019–2024 · $173k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- KLKENNETT LIBRARY AND COMMUNITYone grant, 2022 · $40k
BENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $36k · revenue +56%- KAKEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $35k · revenue +44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…
Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Collateral Repair Project and the most unlike its peers is Wings of Hope Therapeutic Riding Program Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
275 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 275 of the 350 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE HURRICANE ISLAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREENWICH ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds TUBA CITY HUMANE SOCIETY INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds VINFEN CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds FAMILY NURTURING CENTER OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY INC ↗
- Who funds COLLATERAL REPAIR PROJECT ↗
- Who funds US MEXICO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOSTON LYRIC OPERA COMPANY ↗
- Who funds PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Oregon Environmental Council ↗
- Who funds PRISON BOOK PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds MULTIFAITH ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds VERMONT PARENT REPRESENTATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WATER IS LIFE KENYA ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE ↗
- Who funds HANLEY CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RESOURCE A NONPROFIT COMMUNITY ENTERPRISE INC ↗
- Who funds HESPERIAN HEALTH GUIDES ↗
- Who funds INTERVALE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY PENINSULA ↗
- Who funds The Society For Classical Studies ↗
- Who funds Woodlawn School ↗
- Who funds SHELBURNE FARMS ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Californians Against Waste Foundation ↗
- Who funds BORDERLANDS RESTORATION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds HURRICANE ISLAND OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds REACH PREP INC ↗
- Who funds CULTIVATING COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds LA COMPOST ↗
- Who funds THE GROWHAUS ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tomac Foundation · Edmund & Betsy Cabot Charitable Fndn · Boston Foundation Inc · Maine Community Foundation Inc · The Loring Wolcott & Coolidge Charitable Trust-I · The Vermont Community Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · The Cabot Family Charitable Trust · Eastern Bank Foundation · Amelia Peabody Charitable Fund Trust · Goosefoot Community Fund · Whidbey Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Virginia Wellington Cabot Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Vinfen Corporation — 83% of income from government
- Plummer Youth Promise Inc — 64% of income from government
- Parent Child Center Inc — 45% of income from government
- Save the Sound — 37% of income from government
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Hht Foundation — 30% of income from government
- The Safety Team Inc — 21% of income from government
- Project Hope Boston Inc — 18% of income from government
- The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc — 16% of income from government
- He Is Me Institute Inc — 16% of income from government
- Knova Learning Oregon — 13% of income from government
- Intervale Center Inc — 13% of income from government
- Jobs for the Future Inc — 11% of income from government
- Wellspring House Inc — 9% of income from government
- Essex County Greenbelt Association — 8% of income from government
- Coaching for Change Inc — 5% of income from government
- Catie's Closet Inc — 4% of income from government
- Supportive Living Inc — 3% of income from government
- Boston Lyric Opera Company — 3% of income from government
- American Academy of Arts & Sciences — 3% of income from government
- Shelburne Farms — 3% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
- Middlebury Area Land Trust — 2% of income from government
- Resource a Nonprofit Community Enterprise Inc — 2% of income from government
- Revelsinc — 1% of income from government
- Native Arts and Cultures Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Wgbh Educational Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Museum of Science — 0% of income from government
- Cape Cod Academy — 0% of income from government
- The Vermont Community Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Virginia Wellington Cabot Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Virginia Wellington Cabot Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.