Skip to content

Colorado · Nonprofit

Shanta Foundation Inc

Shanta Foundation Inc (Colorado) receives grants from 25 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,590,242 to it, the largest being THE VIBRANT VILLAGE FOUNDATION ($691,916). 21 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.3M
Funders on record
25
Grants received
$2.6M
Net assets
$1.8M
21/25 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 51%
01What it does

What Shanta Foundation Inc does

Mission

To partner with underserved rural villages in Myanmar and Zambia to develop healthy communities. Through a collaborative process, we empower local leadership to make effective, sustainable change focusing on education, quality health care, and economic opportunities

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Village Development Zambia-Shanta Village Partners is structured to reinforce long-term sustainability by funding and training grassroots, locally-based organizations (such as Muditar in Myanmar and Peoples Action Forum in Zambia) rather than directly implementing the Village Partnership Model (VPM) ourselves. This is the preferable approach for several reasons. By investing know-how and resources in local development practitioners, we build local capacity to drive development, ensuring that the necessary skills are rooted in the local communities and not dependent on expatriates. Moreover, it means that our organizational structure reflects the very principles we are trying to share in local communities. Rather than doing for, we equip others to do for themselves. This happens when Shanta trains its local partner, and then it happens again when our local partners go into villages to provide training, facilitation, and encouragement. Finally, this approach empowers the local organization (a separate legal entity from Shanta) to contextualize and execute the VPM. This enhances sustainability because it allows local people, who understand the culture, to adapt the model to fit a…

    $349,870 spentof which $221,631 as grants
    51% of program spending
  2. Shanta Village Partners is pioneering a holistic, community-led, sustainable development model (Village Partnership Model VPM) that equips local people to solve local problems permanently; this approach fosters independency rather than dependency. Moreover, by placing local villagers in control of the partnership, the vestiges of colonialism (so ubiquitous in how international development is commonly implemented) are erased, and the voices, choices, and sovereignty of local people are centered in the project design. When Shanta partners with a village (typically for six years), we begin by facilitating a process whereby the entire village elects a Village Development Team that will design and oversee the implementation of their villages development path. Our approach is not prescriptive. Rather, we believe that the villagers themselves know their context, complete with its opportunities, resources, and challenges, better than we ever will. As such, we facilitate a process whereby the villagers set their development priorities, actually choosing what projects will or wont be pursued. The VDT leads this work and begins by establishing a community bank. The community bank offers…

    $337,894 spentof which $148,558 as grants
    49% of program spending
  3. o Womens group discussions led by the Village Health Educator (VHE) took place in 17 villages with 52 VHEs, involving 1,517 women in knowledge sharing and peer learning. The VHE strengthened its role as a key player in the village health sector by fostering collaboration with the health department through forming village health committees and promoting health awareness among women. All villages involved in the VHE project maintain strong relationships with rural health midwives, collaborating on community mobilization, transportation support, data collection, and maternal health needs. For income generation and economic development, the Soybean project with 72 farmers covering 76.5 acres, the ginger project with 13 farmers on 5 acres, and the Building Resilience Livelihood project with 277 farmers covering 277 acres, were completed in several villages, benefiting a total of 362 farmers. For the Education Program, (1) The Scholarship Fund project, (2) English Summer Class, (3) Library, and (4) Preschool projects were accomplished, which benefited women in 19 villages and benefited 344 students overall. Under the Infrastructure Program, seven projects have been completed: three road…

  4. Leadership project: The Village Development Teams (VDT) consists of 52 members, including 21 women and 31 men. These volunteers dedicate their time, energy, and commitment to various projects. VDT meetings are held regularly, allowing the team to effectively lead and manage village development activities with inclusive participation. They have also fostered collaboration between the village headman and the VDT by inviting them to meetings and encouraging social peer pressure to promote accountability. The Community Bank covered 222 borrowers, providing an opportunity to lend. Villagers borrowed to invest in livestock such as goats, cows, and chickens; they also invested in agricultural inputs, bicycles, and solar panels. The beneficiaries who received loans from the CB are now able to make profits from their businesses, which was previously difficult due to minimal capital. The Women Action Groups (WAG) Project began in April 2025 in Siyowi, Kabanje, Nachili, and Mpasu villages. In Myanmar,

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $687,764.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($501k) Expenses 100 ($425k) Net assets 100 ($265k)2018 Revenue 121 ($604k) Expenses 134 ($569k) Net assets 109 ($290k)2019 Revenue 115 ($578k) Expenses 131 ($558k) Net assets 96 ($253k)2021 Revenue 139 ($698k) Expenses 140 ($595k) Net assets 110 ($291k)2022 Revenue 188 ($941k) Expenses 139 ($591k) Net assets 233 ($616k)2023 Revenue 136 ($684k) Expenses 132 ($560k) Net assets 282 ($747k)2024 Revenue 138 ($693k) Expenses 163 ($694k) Net assets 636 ($1.7M)2025 Revenue 254 ($1.3M) Expenses 249 ($1.1M) Net assets 696 ($1.8M)
'17'18'19'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (254)Expenses (249)Net assets (696)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $789k to $1.8M (+127%).

$272k
$299k
$313k
$451k
$627k
$789k
$1.8M
$2.0M
'17'18'19'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 6% · 2022 5%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

95% of Shanta Foundation Inc’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (61% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,434 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$76k
’17
$36k
’18
$20k
’19
$103k
’21
$350k
’22
$124k
’23
−$1k
’24
$212k
’25
5.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Wade Dennis Griffith

Executive Director

Board chair

Zachary Ray

Co-Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2024 and FY2025 filings.

'17'18'19'21'22'23'24'25
Listed78991011109
Joined·+4+1·+2+2+0+1
No longer listed·30·1112
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 11 funders to 13 funders, grant income rose $168k → $300k.

9 of 25 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 42% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Shanta Foundation Inc’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Shanta Foundation Inc has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 27% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

44% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Shanta Foundation Inc.

27%
largest funder
55%
top three
~7
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 34% · 2018 39% · 2019 29% · 2020 42% · 2021 47% · 2022 44% · 2023 17% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

67% of Shanta Foundation Inc's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 84% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

Shanta Foundation Inc draws 75% of its grant income from funders outside Colorado, across 9 states in all.

WA
NY
MA
OR
CO
MD
DC
AL
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Colorado out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.1M arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Shanta Foundation Inc runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 2,127 community improvement nonprofits its size.

Operating margin17% · above the median
Months of reserve5.1mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)12% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,127 community improvement nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like Shanta Foundation Inc

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Colorado

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

65% of spending goes to programs.

Program 65%Management 16%Fundraising 19%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

73%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Shanta Foundation Inc: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Shanta Foundation Inc?
Shanta Foundation Inc (Colorado) receives grants from 25 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,590,242 to it, the largest being THE VIBRANT VILLAGE FOUNDATION ($691,916). 21 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Shanta Foundation Inc have?
IRS filings report 25 organizations giving $2,590,242 in grants to Shanta Foundation Inc, 21 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Shanta Foundation Inc?
THE VIBRANT VILLAGE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $691,916 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Shanta Foundation Inc find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Colorado. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Shanta →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 25 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing