Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Private foundation

G Harbaugh Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Philanthropy$8.3MHealth$3.6MArts & Culture$1.7MEnvironment$701kEducation$509kYouth Development$360kReligion$336kPublic Benefit$185kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $207k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $400k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.9M
$30,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$57M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATALYST PHILANTHROPY FUND$1,140,000
THE CENTURY CLUB$425,250
PROJECT HEALING WATER FLY FISHING INC$360,000
JESSIE REES FOUNDATION$225,000
MAULI OLA FOUNDATION$75,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
SOUL SURVIVOR OUTDOOR$50,000
PHILANTHROPIC IMPACT FUND$42,000
IAN WALSH MENEHUNE MAYHEM FOUNATION$40,000
SILVER LINING FOUNDATION$30,000
GRAVITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION$25,000
SPIRIT OF LIBERTY FOUNDATION$25,000
MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$25,000
SPECIAL OPS XCURSIONS INC$10,000
NPLB OUTDOORS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF SAN DIEGO: $25k → 11%NPLB OUTDOORS: $10k → 6%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
NV
OH
NJ
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
HI
LA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 34 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +77% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

34 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
53

Total granted

$13M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+33%

Still filing today

65%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPublic BenefitPhilanthropyArts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    PHILANTHROPIC IMPACT FUND
    7× · 2018–2024 · $5.9M · revenue ×11 · 66% of their budget
  • JR
    Jessie Rees Foundation
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +17%
  • SS
    SOUL SURVIVOR OUTDOOR
    6× · 2019–2024 · $335k · revenue +278% · 31% of their budget

Funded once

  • HH
    HEROESPROJECT HEALING WATERS
    one grant, 2019 · $450k
  • BH
    Big Hole River Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $105k · revenue -83% · 78% of their budget
  • SH
    Starkey Hearing Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -72%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
2
The Ocean Foundation

As the only community foundation for the ocean, The Ocean Foundation's 501(c)(3) mission is to improve global ocean health, climate resilience, and the blue economy. We create partnerships to connect people in the communities in which we…

Environment
3
Marine Megafauna Foundation

Save threatened marine life using pioneering research, education, and sustainable conservation solutions

International
4
Santa Cruz Sailing Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
—
6
Reef Check Foundation

Leading Citizen scientists to promote stewardship of sustainable reef communities worldwide.

Environment
7
The Sierra Fund

The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.

Environment
8
Sea Change Foundation
Human Services
9
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
10
Pacific Blue Foundation
Environment
11
National Marine Mammal Foundation Inc

The nmmf's mission is to improve and protect life for marine mammals, humans, and our shared oceans through science, service, and education. our vision is to be the leading laboratory in marine mammal science, where critical questions…

Animals
12
California Marine Sanctuary Foundation

The california marine sanctuary foundation is a nonprofit organization working to advance the understanding and stewardship of ocean resources in california. for over 25 years cmsf has partnered with local communities, businesses,…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Starkey Hearing Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity College Foundatio…Military Veterans SupportCommunity FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…School Parent OrganizationsCommunity FoundationsSenior Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsCancer Support ServicesFood Banks and PantriesEnvironmental Conservation …Policy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%5%<5yr15%7%5–10yr20%42%10–20yr17%20%20–35yr11%13%35–55yr13%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%19%<5yr15%6%5–10yr20%63%10–20yr17%4%20–35yr11%2%35–55yr13%6%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 19% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/74
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,904

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

10
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
65/71
Grantees still filing
48/71
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PHILANTHROPIC IMPACT FUND — $5,922,000 · OtherPHILANTHROPIC IMPACT FUNDTHE CENTURY CLUB — $1,318,450 · OtherTHE CENTURY CLUBIndividual grant recipient — $510,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHEROESPROJECT HEALING WATERS — $450,400 · Other+61 more — $1,260,700 · Other+61 moreJessie Rees Foundation — $1,375,000 · HealthJessie Rees FoundationPROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC — $1,364,000 · HealthPROJECT HEALING WATERS …THE MAULI OLA FOUNDATION DBA BREATH OF LIFE — $355,500 · HealthTHE MAULI OLA FOUNDATIO…+8 more — $368,240 · Health+8 moreCATALYST PHILANTHROPY FUND — $1,140,000 · PhilanthropyCATALYST PHILANT…Social Impact Fund — $940,000 · PhilanthropySocial Impact Fu…JUST KEEP LIVIN FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Philanthropy+4 more — $215,000 · Philanthropy+4 moreMIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $230,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $90,000 · EducationUpper Missouri Waterkeeper Inc — $50,000 · EducationLOVE ONE INTERNATIONAL — $50,000 · Education+2 more — $4,000 · EducationSOUL SURVIVOR OUTDOOR — $334,600 · ReligionFOREVER BALBOA PARK — $30,000 · ReligionTHE SPIRIT OF LIBERTY FOUNDATON — $128,522 · Public BenefitWARFIGHTER SCUBA — $110,000 · Public BenefitPROTEUS ACADEMY INC — $50,000 · Public BenefitSPECIAL OPS XCURSIONS — $20,000 · Public Benefit+2 more — $16,000 · Public BenefitIAN WALSH MENEHUNE MAYHEM FOUNDATION — $180,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$9,461,550Health$3,462,740Philanthropy$2,395,000Education$424,000Religion$364,600Public Benefit$324,522Recreation & Sports$185,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPHILANTHROPIC IMPACT FUND — $5,922,000 over 7y, 66% of budgetJessie Rees Foundation — $1,375,000 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetPROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC — $1,364,000 over 3y, 30% of budgetCATALYST PHILANTHROPY FUND — $1,140,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetSocial Impact Fund — $940,000 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetTHE MAULI OLA FOUNDATION DBA BREATH OF LIFE — $355,500 over 5y, 43% of budgetSOUL SURVIVOR OUTDOOR — $334,600 over 6y, 31% of budgetMIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $230,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetIAN WALSH MENEHUNE MAYHEM FOUNDATION — $180,000 over 6y, 97% of budgetTHE SPIRIT OF LIBERTY FOUNDATON — $128,522 over 5y, 28% of budgetWARFIGHTER SCUBA — $110,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetBig Hole River Foundation Inc — $105,000 over 1y, 78% of budgetStarkey Hearing Foundation — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMARTY HENNESSY INSPIRING CHILDREN FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetJUST KEEP LIVIN FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $100,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $90,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE EMERIL LAGASSE FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetSIMA ENVIRONMENTAL FUND — $75,000 over 3y, 9.1% of budgetVALLEY VIEW SCHOOL INC — $57,200 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDIABETES RESEARCH CONNECTION — $50,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetUpper Missouri Waterkeeper Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetLOVE ONE INTERNATIONAL — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPROTEUS ACADEMY INC — $50,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetSAN DIEGO AIR & SPACE MUSEUM INC — $38,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMONTANA PRESERVATION ALLIANCE INC — $36,500 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetNever Broken Foundation — $32,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOREVER BALBOA PARK — $30,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetGOLDEN RULE CHARITY — $30,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetA SILVER LINING FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF SAN DIEGO — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ELLEN FUND — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGRAVITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetDARE TO CARE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION — $22,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HONOR FOUNDATION INC — $21,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSPECIAL OPS XCURSIONS — $20,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetMIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALASKA RAPTOR REHABILITATION CENTER — $18,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBORN THIS WAY FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFestival of Children Foundation — $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPOSITIVE VIBE WARRIORS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetMUSICARES FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPANGEASEED FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetOPERATION NO PERSONS LEFT BEHIND OUTDOORS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Harbaugh George & Bet…The Stanley E Hanson …Living Legacy Foundat…The San Diego Foundat…The Chuck and Ernesti…Jewish Community Foun…The Conrad Prebys Fou…Rancho Santa Fe Found…Sempra FoundationEdward Charles Founda…The Community Foundat…The Burnham Foundation
Harbaugh George & Betty Charitable FoundationCA24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Harbaugh George & Betty Charitable Foundation · The Stanley E Hanson Foundation · Living Legacy Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · The Chuck and Ernestina Kreutzkamp Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Edward Charles Foundation · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · The Burnham Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization G Harbaugh Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 46%
  • Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc — 46% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to G Harbaugh Foundation?

Find your warmest path to G Harbaugh Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 99 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home