Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Orange County's United Way

To improve lives in orange county by delivering measurable long-term solutions to complex issues in education, financial stability, and housing.

$20M
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$712k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$10MHealth$8.1MEducation$6.4MHousing & Shelter$4.6MYouth Development$1.2MFood & Nutrition$932kEmployment$719kReligion$621kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 35 grants below total $1,656,812 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $20,234,972 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $18,578,160 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $493k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $414k
  • $250k+1 grant · $712k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$39M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ABRAZAR INC$711,500
WORKING WARDROBES FOR A NEW START$165,000
THE CHRYSALIS CENTER$106,000
GOOD HANDS FOUNDATION$88,000
ANAHEIM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT$55,450
SEGERSTROM CENTER FOR THE ARTS$34,065
ACCESS CALIFORNIA SERVICES$34,000
ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT$30,000
ONEOC$26,800
RADIANT FUTURES$25,000
ASIAN AMERICAN SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICE$24,500
LAGUNA WOODS VILLAGE PC CLUB$24,000
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP$22,000
VIETNAMESE AMERICAN CANCER FOUNDATION$20,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $8.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER: $200k → 10%Hope Through Housing Foundation: $362k → 14%THE CAMBODIAN FAMILY: $188k → 10%HOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION: $158k → 14%HAITIAN BRIDGE ALLIANCE: $45k → 11%Haitian Bridge Alliance: $20k → 11%The Cambodian Family: $105k → 10%The Cambodian Family: $105k → 10%CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER: $75k → 10%United American Indian Involvement: $90k → 14%United American Indian Involvement: $90k → 14%Special Service for Groups Inc: $48k → 14%LATINO HEALTH ACCESS: $56k → 10%CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER: $50k → 10%SERVE THE PEOPLE INC: $25k → 10%SERVING PEOPLE IN NEED (SPIN): $100k → 10%SERVING PEOPLE IN NEED (SPIN): $75k → 10%SAAHAS FOR CAUSE: $37k → 14%Saahas for Cause: $25k → 14%SERVING PEOPLE IN NEED (SPIN): $50k → 10%SERVING PEOPLE IN NEED (SPIN): $50k → 10%SHARE OUR SELVES: $25k → 10%ILLUMINATION INSTITUTE: $180k → 10%Illumination Institute: $105k → 10%Illumination Institute: $105k → 10%GRACE SOCIAL AND MEDICAL SERVICES: $45k → 10%WISEPLACE: $30k → 10%ARAB AMERICAN CIVIC COUNCIL: $45k → 10%Arab American Civic Council: $25k → 10%ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION: $55k → 10%ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION: $55k → 10%MULTI-ETHNIC COLLABORATIVE OF COMMUNITY AGENCIES: $25k → 10%YMCA of Orange County: $362k → 10%YMCA OF ORANGE COUNTY: $150k → 10%SOULRAPHA: $45k → 10%SoulRapha aka Orange County Amazing Grace Minis: $25k → 10%ABRAZAR INC: $713k → 10%ACCESS CALIFORNIA SERVICES: $194k → 10%ABRAZAR INC: $712k → 10%ABRAZAR INC: $703k → 10%ABRAZAR INC: $673k → 10%ABRAZAR INC: $514k → 10%ABRAZAR INC: $444k → 10%ABRAZAR INC: $429k → 10%ABRAZAR INC: $429k → 10%ACCESS CALIFORNIA SERVICES: $34k → 10%ABRAZAR INC: $329k → 10%RADIANT FUTURES: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$32M · 119 repeat orgs$41M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

119 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 93 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

119
72

Total granted

$32M
$41M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
0%

Still filing today

81%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $251k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    Abrazar Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4.9M · revenue +54%
  • MH
    MERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +631%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $970k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • O(
    OTHERS (PASS-THRU 501C(3) & LESS THAN 5000)
    one grant, 2021 · $40M
  • SP
    SACRED PATH INDIGENOUS WELLNESS CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $428k · revenue 0%
  • SS
    Special Service for Groups Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $48k · revenue +56%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—
2
Human Services Association

The principal mission of Human Services Association is to provide families with compassionate and comprehensive care to promote wellness and build strong communities.

Human Services
3
Orange County Adult Achievement Center Dba My Day Counts

Our mission is to train people with intellectual and other developmental disabilities for success in life and work. We provide life empowering services to more than 450 adults with disabilities including employment, education, housing,…

—
4
Catholic Charities of Orange County Inc

The mission of catholic charities of orange county is to provide service to people in need, promote their voice in society, and to call the church and all people to do the same."

Human Services
5
All Inclusive Community Health Cent

The organization provides health care and other related services to medically underserved populations in Los Angeles County.

Health
6
African Com Public Health Coalition

To improve personal and community health and wellness within the african community by increasing the availability of culturally relevant physical and mental health services.

Health
7
Association of California Cities

To support local control and promote good governance & policy making among orange county leaders.

Education
8
Open Paths Counseling Center

Open paths counseling center's mission is to meet the evolving mental health needs of the community through quality counseling for individuals and families at affordable fees; free therapy programs for at-risk children and youth in local…

Health
9
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network

To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.

Health
10
Friends of Family Health Center

To provide access to affordable quality medical, dental, behavioral, and other health care services to all residents of southern california communities, especially vulnerable populations.

Philanthropy
11
Orange County Partnership Regional Health Information Organization Inc

The organization was formed to provide a venue in which healthcare providers and agencies can share patient information to improve the overall quality of patient care.

—
12
East Valley Community Health Center Inc

East valley community health center's mission is to provide access to excellent health care while engaging and empowering our patients, employees and partners to improve their well-being and health of our communities.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Families Forward and the most unlike its peers is Fieldstone Leadership Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyBusiness & Industry Associa…Asian Faith & Cultural Cent…Christian Missionary Organi…Disability Services & Suppo…Performing Arts Organizatio…Orange County Community Ser…International Development A…Youth Education & EnrichmentRegional Chambers of Commer…Family Philanthropic Founda…Affordable Housing Developm…College-Preparatory Charter…Youth Enrichment and CareDisease-Specific Support Or…College & School FoundationsCommunity Health and Social…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%8%<5yr16%8%5–10yr21%20%10–20yr18%27%20–35yr9%19%35–55yr10%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%2%<5yr16%2%5–10yr21%18%10–20yr18%42%20–35yr9%15%35–55yr10%22%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1.0%2/203
the rest of the field
14%
2,089/15,095

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

170 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 170 of the 204 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
28
Early backer (in before they grew)
164/170
Grantees still filing
96/170
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OTHERS (PASS-THRU 501C(3) & LESS THAN 5000) — $39,564,023 · OtherOTHERS (PASS-THRU 501C(3) & LESS THAN 5000)+91 more — $14,736,521 · Other+91 moreAbrazar Inc — $4,944,412 · Human ServicesAbrazar IncHOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION — $519,500 · Human ServicesHOPE THROUGH …YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ORANGE COUNTY — $512,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S C…THE CAMBODIAN FAMILY — $397,500 · Human ServicesIllumination Institute — $390,000 · Human ServicesCHILD GUIDANCE CENTER INC — $325,000 · Human Services+43 more — $1,942,081 · Human Services+43 moreVITAL ACCESS CARE FOUNDATION — $539,500 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY — $539,143 · HealthMOMS ORANGE COUNTY — $519,500 · HealthINSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE ADVANCEMENT — $507,000 · HealthMISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER — $465,250 · HealthSACRED PATH INDIGENOUS WELLNESS CENTER — $427,637 · HealthSHANTI ORANGE COUNTY — $397,500 · HealthCOALITION OF OC COMMUNITY CLINICS — $390,000 · HealthPACIFIC ISLANDER HEALTH PARTNERSHIP — $377,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY — $320,550 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE OF OC — $173,677 · Health+13 more — $520,166 · HealthMERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS — $1,112,690 · Housing & ShelterTHE KENNEDY COMMISSION — $507,000 · Housing & ShelterFRIENDSHIP SHELTER INC — $122,151 · Housing & Shelter+4 more — $81,630 · Housing & ShelterONEOC — $918,223 · PhilanthropyCAL STATE FULLERTON PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION — $569,500 · PhilanthropyFAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES — $152,618 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION — $69,500 · Philanthropy+3 more — $33,500 · PhilanthropyProject Hope Alliance — $390,000 · EducationSANTA ANA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC FACILITIES CORPORATION — $380,050 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION — $144,750 · EducationMARSHALLESE YOUTH OF ORANGE COUNTY — $62,000 · EducationCoastline Community College Foundation — $58,189 · EducationLAGUNA WOODS VILLAGE PC CLUB — $46,000 · EducationCSU FULLERTON AUXILIARY SERVICES CORPORATION — $40,000 · Education+7 more — $72,500 · EducationORANGE COUNTY CONGREGATION COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION — $527,000 · Community ImprovementCHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY — $289,500 · Community ImprovementVITAL LINK EDUCATION- BUSINESS CONSORTIUM — $121,457 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $40,000 · Community Improvement+3 more — $22,500 · Community Improvement
Other$54,300,544Human Services$9,030,493Health$5,177,423Housing & Shelter$1,823,471Philanthropy$1,743,341Education$1,193,489Community Improvement$1,000,457

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAbrazar Inc — $4,944,412 over 9y, 8.0% of budgetPeople For Irvine Community Health — $1,511,754 over 7y, 26% of budgetMERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS — $1,112,690 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY — $970,101 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetONEOC — $918,223 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ORANGE COAST — $688,750 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC — $647,247 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCAL STATE FULLERTON PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION — $569,500 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetVITAL ACCESS CARE FOUNDATION — $539,500 over 3y, 17% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY — $539,143 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetORANGE COUNTY CONGREGATION COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION — $527,000 over 2y, 47% of budgetHOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION — $519,500 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetMOMS ORANGE COUNTY — $519,500 over 2y, 16% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ORANGE COUNTY — $512,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE KENNEDY COMMISSION — $507,000 over 2y, 40% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE ADVANCEMENT — $507,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetMISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER — $465,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSACRED PATH INDIGENOUS WELLNESS CENTER — $427,637 over 1y, 21% of budgetFAMILIES FORWARD — $406,500 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetTHE CAMBODIAN FAMILY — $397,500 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetSHANTI ORANGE COUNTY — $397,500 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetProject Hope Alliance — $390,000 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetIllumination Institute — $390,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetCOALITION OF OC COMMUNITY CLINICS — $390,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetSANTA ANA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC FACILITIES CORPORATION — $380,050 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetPACIFIC ISLANDER HEALTH PARTNERSHIP — $377,500 over 3y, 14% of budgetGOOD HANDS FOUNDATION — $361,000 over 9y, 86% of budgetCHILD GUIDANCE CENTER INC — $325,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY — $320,550 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetCHRYSALIS CENTER — $306,516 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY — $289,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetALIANZA TRANSLATINX — $282,500 over 2y, 10.0% of budgetServing People In Need Inc — $275,000 over 4y, 6.8% of budgetABOUND FOOD CARE — $250,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetACCESS CALIFORNIA SERVICES — $245,166 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ORANGE COUNTY — $238,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetSERVING KIDS HOPE — $236,500 over 2y, 17% of budgetWOMEN HELPING WOMEN — $188,344 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetUNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT INC — $187,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE OF OC — $173,677 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetFAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES — $152,618 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetROADTRIP NATION LTD — $146,715 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION — $144,750 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSegerstrom Center for the Arts — $143,268 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRANSLATIN COALITION — $140,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $134,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPure Game — $123,400 over 6y, 5.2% of budgetFRIENDSHIP SHELTER INC — $122,151 over 6y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Abrazar Inc ↗
  • Who funds People For Irvine Community Health ↗
  • Who funds MERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ONEOC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ORANGE COAST ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CAL STATE FULLERTON PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VITAL ACCESS CARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY CONGREGATION COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MOMS ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THE KENNEDY COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE ADVANCEMENT ↗
  • Who funds MISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SACRED PATH INDIGENOUS WELLNESS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES FORWARD ↗
  • Who funds THE CAMBODIAN FAMILY ↗
  • Who funds SHANTI ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Project Hope Alliance ↗
  • Who funds Illumination Institute ↗
  • Who funds COALITION OF OC COMMUNITY CLINICS ↗
  • Who funds SANTA ANA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC FACILITIES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC ISLANDER HEALTH PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds GOOD HANDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CHRYSALIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ALIANZA TRANSLATINX ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Communi…Sisters of St Joseph …Hoag Memorial Hospita…O L Halsell FoundationCharitable Ventures o…OneocSt Joseph Health Syst…Weingart FoundationSamueli FoundationEdwards Lifesciences …Farmers & Merchants B…Kaiser Foundation Hos…
Orange County Community FoundationCA115.7× affinity88 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian · O L Halsell Foundation · Charitable Ventures of Orange County · Oneoc · St Joseph Health System Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Samueli Foundation · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Orange County's United Way funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    64report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 204 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines