· Private foundation
The Stallings Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $260k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $320k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEXUS RECEOVERY CENTER | $200,000 |
| YOUTH 180 | $70,000 |
| SAMARITANS PURSE | $50,000 |
| FRISCO FAMILY SERVICES | $40,000 |
| NEXUS RECEOVERY CENTER | $30,000 |
| MENTOR KIDS USA | $30,000 |
| CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| FAMILY COMPASS | $20,000 |
| NOMI NETWORK | $20,000 |
| FAMILY GATEWAY | $20,000 |
| HOUSE OF REFUGE | $15,000 |
| NEW DAY SERVICES | $10,000 |
| BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES | $10,000 |
| INCARNATION HOUSE | $10,000 |
| LULLABY HOUSE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $501k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NRNexus Recovery Center Incorporated4× · 2021–2024 · $600k · revenue +28%
- FFFRISCO FAMILY SERVICES CENTER7× · 2018–2024 · $214k · revenue +19%
- Y1YOUTH 180 INC4× · 2021–2024 · $213k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- SASHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATIONone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -4%
- TSTHE SHELTON SCHOOLone grant, 2020 · $50k
- TFThe Family Placeone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -25%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County (Family Houston) is to create a stronger community for tomorrow by helping individuals and families meet the challenges they face today. We help others help themselves.
Compass family services helps homeless families and those at imminent risk to achieve housing stability, economic self-sufficiency, and well-being.
Support law enforcement and promote public safety awareness and crime prevention in Fort Worth.
Communities in schools of central texas (cisct) ensures students have holistic support, removing academic and nonacademic barriers to their success in school.
With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…
Achieving permanent sanctuary and healing homes for children and families from hard places.
Our mission is to provide quality mental health services to children and adults in low income families who are impacted by severe and persistent mental illness, emotional disturbances, child abuse and neglect, high-risk behaviors and…
Changing the course of a child's life by stabilizing families and strengthening mental health.
TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.
Our mission is to show the love of christ to each and every child and family towhom we serve and beyond. we do this by creating a culture where the needs of children,families, and staff are seen and met in creative and innovative ways.
Friends of the children - austin is a texas based nonprofit with the mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years,no matter…
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Lullaby House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Nexus Recovery Center Incorporated ↗
- Who funds FRISCO FAMILY SERVICES CENTER ↗
- Who funds YOUTH 180 INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds MentorKids USA ↗
- Who funds FAMILY COMPASS ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF REFUGE INC ↗
- Who funds SHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NOMI NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Embrace Waiting Children Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY GATEWAY INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EVERY AVENUE ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds EXODUS MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds KITCHEN ON THE STREET INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds The Family Place ↗
- Who funds SOJOURNER CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Lullaby House ↗
- Who funds CHILD CRISIS ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds TEXAS EXPRESS BASKETBALL CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY ↗
- Who funds REFUGE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds Touchdown Club ↗
- Who funds HOPE SUPPLY CO ↗
- Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF COLLIN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds JIMMIE JOHNSON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CITY HOUSE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Katherine C Carmody Charitable Tuw · Capital for Kids · Theodore and Beulah Beasley Foundation Inc · The Addy Foundation · Gil and Dody Weaver Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Stallings Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Stallings Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Stallings Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.