Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Stagman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Recreation & Sports$4.1MReligion$1.1MEducation$359kPhilanthropy$144kHealth$28kCrime & Legal$20kAnimals$7kInternational$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$500
Median grant
6
States reached
$36k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN MARTYRS CATHOLIC COMMUNITY$16,200
THE SUMBA FOUNDATION$1,000
WILSON DISEASE ASSOCIATION$1,000
AMERICAN MARTYRS SCHOOL$500
MAYCREST MANOR$500
PEACEFUL VALLEY DONKEY RESCUE$103
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND$100
PROJECT K-9 HERO$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WILLOW INTERNATIONAL: $333 → 10%MEGIDDO DREAM STATION: $1k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $520 → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 17%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
OR
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
VA
TN
NC
SC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.7M · 24 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
53

Total granted

$5.7M
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+14%

Still filing today

71%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2022 · $2.3M · revenue +59%
  • US
    UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE
    2× · 2018–2019 · $1.6M · revenue +54%
  • LC
    Legacy Connections
    4× · 2018–2023 · $273k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • LA
    LEGAL AID FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • YC
    YELLOWSTONE COMMUNITY CLUB
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • VD
    VERBUM DEI JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
2
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
3
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
4
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals
5
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
6
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
7
United Animal Nations Dba Redrover

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and…

8
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals
9
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
10
American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation

The mission of the akc canine health foundation, inc. is to fund, advance, and communicate canine health research and science through knowledge and discovery.

Animals
11
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
12
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alaqua Animal Refuge Inc and the most unlike its peers is Western Asset Management Company Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Health Access Advocacy and …Animal Rescue and ShelterYouth Sports ProgramsEnvironmental Conservation …Domestic Violence ServicesSenior Support ServicesCancer Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsFood Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr21%19%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr12%18%35–55yr13%40%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr21%54%10–20yr17%0%20–35yr12%3%35–55yr13%42%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/62
the rest of the field
13%
4,367/33,355

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/54
Grantees still filing
39/54
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION — $2,250,000 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATIONUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE — $1,575,000 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC COMMITTEELegacy Connections — $273,000 · Recreation & SportsLegacy Connections+1 more — $500 · Recreation & SportsAMERICAN MARTYRS CATHOLIC COMMUNITY — $1,114,430 · OtherAMERICAN MARTYRS CATHOLIC C…OFFICE OF CATHOLIC EDUCATION — $181,000 · OtherOFFICE OF CATHOLIC EDUCATIO…+43 more — $133,633 · Other+43 morePROVIDENCE LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY FOUNDATION — $140,000 · Philanthropy+3 more — $1,840 · PhilanthropyWIDENER UNIVERSITY — $83,470 · EducationSAINT PETER'S UNIVERSITY — $40,000 · EducationMUHLENBERG COLLEGE — $5,000 · Education+3 more — $3,250 · EducationMARYCREST MANOR — $7,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $5,050 · HealthNATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION — $2,288 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $1,750 · HealthABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Health+3 more — $1,538 · HealthAnimals Rule Placement Foundation — $1,425 · AnimalsSO CA BULLDOG RESCUE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BULLDOG RESCUE INC — $1,200 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $1,200 · AnimalsHOLLYWOOD HUSKIES — $850 · AnimalsLEESBURG HUMANE SOCIETY — $500 · AnimalsBella Vita Rescue Inc — $309 · Animals+8 more — $958 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Public Safety & DisasterNETWORK FOR GOOD — $1,030 · Public Safety & Disaster
Recreation & Sports$4,098,500Other$1,429,063Philanthropy$141,840Education$131,720Health$19,126Animals$6,442Public Safety & Disaster$6,030

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION — $2,250,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE — $1,575,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLegacy Connections — $273,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetPROVIDENCE LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY FOUNDATION — $140,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWIDENER UNIVERSITY — $83,470 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT PETER'S UNIVERSITY — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARYCREST MANOR — $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $5,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $5,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUHLENBERG COLLEGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION — $2,288 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $1,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $1,520 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAnimals Rule Placement Foundation — $1,425 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSUMBA FOUNDATION — $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSO CA BULLDOG RESCUE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BULLDOG RESCUE INC — $1,200 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND — $1,140 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD — $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC — $1,025 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEGIDDO DREAM STATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWarrior Dog Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLLYWOOD HUSKIES — $850 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF ST LAWRENCE-WATTS YOUTH CENTER — $600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $513 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEESBURG HUMANE SOCIETY — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE AGAINST HEROIN — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUILD A MIRACLE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANCHOR HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWillow International Everfree — $333 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $307 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PLAY EQUITY FUND — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $200 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetPROJECT K9 HERO — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $155 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE
  • Who funds Legacy Connections
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WIDENER UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SAINT PETER'S UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MARYCREST MANOR
  • Who funds Feeding America
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MUHLENBERG COLLEGE
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE
  • Who funds Animals Rule Placement Foundation
  • Who funds SUMBA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SO CA BULLDOG RESCUE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BULLDOG RESCUE INC
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD
  • Who funds GIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC
  • Who funds MEGIDDO DREAM STATION
  • Who funds Wilson Disease Association
  • Who funds Warrior Dog Foundation

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Stagman FoundationCO26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Stagman Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · California Community Foundation · Carrie Estelle Doheny Foundation · Western Asset Management Company Charitable Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Ahmanson Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Orange County Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Stagman Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Saint Peter's University0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Stagman Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Stagman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph