· Private foundation
Dermody Properties Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k135 grants · $225k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK | $10,000 |
| LA DISASTER RELIEF AMERICAN RED CROSS | $10,000 |
| COMPTON JUNIOR EQUESTRIANS | $5,000 |
| COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MERCER COUNTY | $3,000 |
| CANCER WELLNESS CENTER | $3,000 |
| LAURA'S HOUSE | $3,000 |
| YORK COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER | $3,000 |
| CIRCLE OF FRIENDS | $3,000 |
| SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY | $3,000 |
| FILL A HEART 4 KIDS | $3,000 |
| SENIORS IN SERVICE | $3,000 |
| STANDUP FOR KIDS ORANGE COUNTY | $3,000 |
| THOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTER | $3,000 |
| SAGE ELDERCARE | $3,000 |
| TAKE A HIKE | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $267k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
159 repeat relationships — 59 still active in FY2025, 100 since wound down; 78 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $145k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CTCAMP TWIN LAKES INC5× · 2021–2025 · $17k · revenue +25%
- SHSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC4× · 2020–2025 · $17k · revenue +3%
StandUp for Kids4× · 2021–2025 · $14k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- CFCONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +124%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $5k
- OVOAK VALLEY COLLEGEgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue +151%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.
Sierra Nevada Children's Services enhances the community by supporting quality childcare and empowering families to aspire to life-long success.
Northern Nevada Hopes provides affordable, high-quality, medical, behavioral health, and support services for all. We are dedicated to building a healthier community by providing coordinated care and support for individuals and family…
Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.
New vista is committed to providing people of all ages with intellectual and developmental disabilities, equitable opportunities, and supported living arrangements so that they may experience life to the fullest.
The mission of Wayfinder Family Services is to ensure that children, youth and adults facing challenges always have a place to turn. Founded in 1953 as the Foundation for the Junior Blind, the organization initially enabled visually…
Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…
We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.
To provide safety, compassion, and respect as we educate, empower, and advocate for individuals, families, and young people.
Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…
To provide dignity, respect and choice for persons with developmental disabilities
Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections for the Homeless Inc and the most unlike its peers is Women Wonder Writers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
381 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 381 of the 499 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ATLANTA CHILDREN'S SHELTER INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds CAMP TWIN LAKES INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds StandUp for Kids ↗
- Who funds BELLEVUE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NORTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds LAURA'S HOUSE ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds Valley of the Sun Young Men's Christian Association ↗
- Who funds TOGETHER WE RISE ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ADOPT A VET DENTAL PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities of Northern Nevada ↗
- Who funds TRUCKEE MEADOWS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GLOUCESTER COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds MIRACLE FLIGHTS ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC ↗
- Who funds HARBOR HOUSE OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds CASA FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED ADVOCACY GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds Quest Counseling & Consulting Inc ↗
- Who funds NEVADA YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROJECT ↗
- Who funds MULTI-SERVICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Awaken INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NOTHERN NEVADA INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF PUGET SOUND ↗
- Who funds 5 Strong Scholarship Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN-PORTLAND ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NEW CASTLE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SENIORS IN SERVICE ↗
- Who funds Rebirth Homes Inc ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH CENTRAL PA ↗
- Who funds BELOVED ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds THE HEALING PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds PADS TO HOPE DBA-JOURNEYS THE ROAD HOME ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Robert Z Hawkins Foundation · The Nell J Redfield Foundation · The E L Cord Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · John Ben Snow Memorial Tr Uw #839158 · Renown Health · Robert S & Dorothy J Keyser Foundation · Peek Family Charitable Foundation · Helen Close Charitable Foundation · The Marshall R Matley Foundation · United Way of Southern Nevada
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dermody Properties Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Lines for Life — 70% of income from government
- United Advocacy Group Inc — 52% of income from government
- Portland YouthBuilders — 35% of income from government
- Clackamas Women's Services — 33% of income from government
- Oaks Integrated Care Inc — 31% of income from government
- Food Bank of Delaware Inc — 26% of income from government
- Habitat for Humanity of New Castle County — 21% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- Family Promise of Morris County Inc — 17% of income from government
- Raphael House of Portland — 10% of income from government
- Friends of the Children-Portland — 5% of income from government
- Girls Inc of the Pacific Northwest — 4% of income from government
- Legacy Treatment Services Inc — 2% of income from government
- Casa for Children Inc — 2% of income from government
- Sage Eldercare — 1% of income from government
- Neighborhood Center Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Dermody Properties Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Dermody Properties Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.