· Private foundation
The Sacchi Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k11 grants · $51k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $46k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ORANGE COUNTY MUSIC & DANCE | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $11,000 |
| DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF ORANGE COUNTY | $10,000 |
| POLO PONY RESCUE INC | $9,000 |
| COOP FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| GENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD | $5,000 |
| MORNINGSTAR CHRISTIAN CHAPEL | $5,000 |
| WHITTIER AREA COMMUNITY CHURCH | $5,000 |
| DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES | $5,000 |
| LEAVE NO PAWS BEHIND INC | $5,000 |
| WHITTIER AREA FIRST DAY COALITION | $5,000 |
| FOREVERHOME PET RESCUE INC | $3,000 |
| HUMANE FARMING ASSOCIATION | $3,000 |
| FRIENDSHIP SQUARE QUILT GUILD INC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $404k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +79% since the first grant, against -7% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TWThe Whole Child - Mental Health & Housing Services3× · 2018–2020 · $180k · revenue +248%
- OCORANGE COUNTY MUSIC AND DANCE INC7× · 2018–2025 · $175k · revenue +153%
- RHRio Hondo College Foundation3× · 2018–2020 · $120k · revenue +57%
Funded once
- MEMIND EDUCATIONone grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +3%
- FTFIRST TEE OF LOS ANGELESone grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue -72%
- SCSPECIAL CHILDREN'S LEAGUE INC - WHITTIER COMMITTEEone grant, 2018 · $35k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Orange County provides a powerful voice and a meaningful connection for children who have experienced abuse, neglect and abandoment.
Western Youth Services (WYS) is a community-based nonprofit organization providing prevention and mental health treatment services for youth experiencing emotional and behavioral challenges, as well as their families. Services are…
Our missions is to restore youth to lives of purpose, meaning and opportunity. human services network, dba youth services network (ysn), was founded in 1985. ysn operates three (3) community-based homes that serve boys from throughout los…
The mission of Laurel House (dba Hope Harbor) is providing a home for teens in crisis, transforming lives, and strengthening families. Laurel House has the only long-term youth shelters in Orange County, CA for runaway, homeless and…
Since 1888, Five Acres has been supporting children and families within their communities. Today, we partner with families across Southern California to create a permanent, safe, and healthy environment for every child. We offer a full…
Our mission is to provide our children and families with love, education and family based concurrent services. We feel honored to have served more than 20,176 children and youth during our 31 years of service.
All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)
The mission of Wayfinder Family Services is to ensure that children, youth and adults facing challenges always have a place to turn. Founded in 1953 as the Foundation for the Junior Blind, the organization initially enabled visually…
CHS guides youth and young adults forward to hope and resiliency.
Casa Pacifica inspires hope and nurtures mental health and well-being of children, young adults, and families to realize their full potential.
We are a premier provider dedicated to healing children and young adults, strengthening families, and transforming communities through quality comprehensive services and advocacy. we envision a world in which children and young adults,…
Colettes childrens home provides housing and supportive services to homeless women and children with nowhere to turn. we work to remove the barriers that cause displacement and provide the means for transition from homelessness to stable…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oneoc and the most unlike its peers is Leave No Paws Behind Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Whole Child - Mental Health & Housing Services ↗
- Who funds ORANGE COUNTY MUSIC AND DANCE INC ↗
- Who funds Rio Hondo College Foundation ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S CRISIS SHELTER ↗
- Who funds Helpline Youth Counseling Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds MARIANNE FROSTIG CTR OF EDU THERAPY ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE ACCESS PLAN ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WHITTIER INC ↗
- Who funds David and Margaret Home Inc ↗
- Who funds CASA OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds STRIVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds POLO PONY RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds MIND EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds GENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD ↗
- Who funds LEAVE NO PAWS BEHIND INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST TEE OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds Whittier Area First Day Coalition ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
- Who funds CHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds INTERVAL HOUSE ↗
- Who funds FOREVERHOME PET RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANE FARMING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Bridge of Faith ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds JEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds CAMP ALANDALE ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF LONG BEACH AND ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Eco Urban Gardens ↗
- Who funds Parenteen Inc ↗
- Who funds Resource for Education Advocacy Communication and Housing ↗
- Who funds FROM MADDIS CLOSET ↗
- Who funds CAMP OCEAN PINES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Credit Union of Southern California · Orange County Community Foundation · United Way Inc · The Ahmanson Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Green Foundation · In-N-Out Burgers Foundation · Shelter Partnership Inc · PIH Health Whittier Hospital
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Sacchi Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Sacchi Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Sacchi Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.