Skip to content
The People Concern at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The People Concern

THE PEOPLE CONCERN believes no one should have to live on the street or in an abusive household.

$12M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$600k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$10MHuman Services$8.6MHealth$6.4MEducation$35kEmployment$22k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $1,337,266, the rows itemized in this filing. The $12,014,583 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,677,317 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $29k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $709k
  • $250k+1 grant · $600k
$125,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$124M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOS ANGELES CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER$599,648
VENICE FAMILY CLINIC$242,563
SABAN COMMUNITY CLINIC$162,932
THE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD$125,500
PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS$109,502
EXODUS RECOVERY INC$68,284
ANTELOPE VALLEY PARTNERS FOR HEALTH$28,837
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $13.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $542k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $401k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $399k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $368k → 14%HOMELESS HEALTHCARE LA: $967k → 14%HOMELESS HEALTHCARE LA: $966k → 14%HOMELESS HEALTHCARE LA: $930k → 14%HOMELESS HEALTHCARE LA: $911k → 14%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $200k → 14%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $200k → 14%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $190k → 14%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $168k → 14%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $142k → 14%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $110k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $471k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $376k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $364k → 14%SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH: $15k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $308k → 14%THE CENTER AT BLESSED SACRAMENT: $1.5M → 14%THE CENTER AT BELSSED SACRAMENT: $1.2M → 14%THE CENTER AT BELSSED SACRAMENT: $1.2M → 14%THE CENTER AT BLESSED SACRAMENT: $1.1M → 14%THE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD: $126k → 14%THE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD: $125k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23M · 12 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$23M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+76%

Still filing today

92%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD
    6× · 2020–2025 · $5.3M · revenue +101% · 55% of their budget
  • HH
    Homeless Health Care Los Angeles
    4× · 2020–2023 · $3.8M · revenue +117%
  • LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER
    4× · 2020–2023 · $3.3M · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • LI
    LAMP INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1.9M · revenue -7%
  • RU
    REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2022 · $35k
  • MS
    MEDICAL STAFFING NETWORK
    one grant, 2024 · $22k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Didi Hirsch Psychiatric Service

The roots of the los angeles didi hirsch psychiatric service dba didi hirsch mental health services ("dhmhs") extend back to the 1930s, when a group of women funded psychiatric care for people whose lives were devastated by the depression.…

Health
2
Jwch Institute Inc

The specific purposes of this organization are:(a) to provide outpatient primary health service in underserved areas and/or for medically underserved populations as a community clinic. (b) to develop, promote, and manage health care…

Health
3
Chicago House & Social Service Agency

Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids

Health
4
The Children's Clinic 'Serving Children and Their Families'

TCC Family Health mission is to provide innovative, integrated, quality health care that will contribute to a healthy community, focusing on those in need and working with patients and the community as partners in their overall well-being.

—
5
Union Station Homeless Services

We work to end homelessness through housing solutions, supportive services, and connection to community. we advocate for equitable and just systems that ensure all individuals and families will have a safe place they can call home.

Human Services
6
Los Angeles Centers for Alcohol and Drug Abuse

Our Vision is to enhance the educational and economic well-being of the people we serve by means of direct human services, advocacy, and referrals.Our Mission is to save lives, unite families, and protect the community through addiction…

—
7
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
8
Healthright 360

To give hope and change lives. we do this by offering a continuum of prevention, intervention, behavioral health and wellness services to adults and families throughout california. these services aim to reduce costs of societal problems by…

—
9
The Midnight Mission

The midnight mission seeks to offer a bridge to self sufficiency for people experiencing homelessness through interim shelter, advocacy, education, training and job placement, make available the necessities of life, offer the 12-step…

Human Services
10
Covenant House California

Covenant house is dedicated to serving all of god's children with absolute respect and unconditional love to help youth experiencing homelessness and to protect and safeguard all youth in need.

Human Services
11
Ascencia

To lift people of out homelessness, one person, one family at a time.

Housing & Shelter
12
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Los Angeles Free Clinic; the most unlike its peers is Exodus Foundation for Recovery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD: $5,257,589 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER IN HOLLYWOODHomeless Health Care Los Angeles: $3,774,090 · Human ServicesHomeless Health Care Los AngelesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $1,710,071 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTERCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $1,518,318 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INCPATH: $1,010,271 · Human ServicesPATH+1 more: $15,000 · Human ServicesLOS ANGELES CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTERS: $3,218,801 · HealthLOS ANGELES CHRISTIAN HEAL…THE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC: $1,394,253 · HealthTHE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINI…VENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $1,214,077 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINIC+1 more: $15,000 · HealthLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $3,318,550 · OtherLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTERLAMP INC: $1,904,148 · OtherLAMP INCEXODUS RECOVERY INC: $414,528 · OtherEXODUS RECOVERY INC+3 more: $145,287 · OtherANTELOPE VALLEY PARTNERS FOR HEALTH: $192,640 · Community Improvement
Human Services$13,285,339Health$5,842,131Other$5,782,513Community Improvement$192,640

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD: $5,257,589 over 6y, 55% of budgetHomeless Health Care Los Angeles: $3,774,090 over 4y, 7.5% of budgetLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $3,318,550 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetLOS ANGELES CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTERS: $3,218,801 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetLAMP INC: $1,904,148 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $1,710,071 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $1,518,318 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTHE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC: $1,394,253 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $1,214,077 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetPATH: $1,010,271 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetANTELOPE VALLEY PARTNERS FOR HEALTH: $192,640 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetEXODUS FOUNDATION FOR RECOVERY: $88,324 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetSAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD ↗
  • Who funds Homeless Health Care Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds LAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds PATH ↗
  • Who funds ANTELOPE VALLEY PARTNERS FOR HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds EXODUS FOUNDATION FOR RECOVERY ↗
  • Who funds CLAREMATRIX ↗
  • Who funds SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ralph M Parsons F…Weingart FoundationCalifornia Community …Lamp IncCedars-Sinai Medical …Shelter Partnership I…United Way IncThe Rose Hills Founda…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · California Community Foundation · Lamp Inc · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · Shelter Partnership Inc · United Way Inc · The Rose Hills Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The People Concern funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The People Concern. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on People Concern’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home