Loading…
Loading…
· Public charity
End homelessness of los angeles' most vulnerable individuals, primarily adults with mental illness.
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2019.
Your grants by size, and where they go.
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.
For over 80 years, tcc family health (tcc), has been responding to community identified health needs and working to address health disparities and inequities. see schedule o.
WesttLA Homeless employs a caseworker organization and recruits volunteers to assist the homeless persons to make use of city and county services for housing, healthcare, addiction services, legal services as well as provides clothing,…
Low-income housing the mission of l.a. family housing is to help people transition out of homelessness and poverty through a continuum of housing enriched with
Mental health services, advocacy, workforce training, and education.
We provide housing and support services for low-income persons with hiv/aids and other illnesses.
To provide high quality, customer-friendly primary care and related to all residents of south los angeles, especially those who are underserved.
During FY 22-23 LACADA successfully secured grants totaling $5,807,639 million from the Department of Health Care, under the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program (BHCIP). These grants are part of a $2.1 billion effort aimed…
The organization develops and operates high quality affordable housing and provides resident services for low-income families, seniors and people with special needs.
To improve the health status and well being of underserved segments of the population of los angeles area through the direct provision or coordination of health care, health education services and research.
Health care la ipa's (hcla) mission is to provide community-based providers in los angeles county with a managed, integrated healthcare delivery system to serve their communities in an organized, efficient, compassionate and financially…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homeless Health Care Los Angeles and the most unlike its peers is Los Angeles Lgbt Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Rose Hills Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Community Foundation · United Way Inc · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The People Concern · Shelter Partnership Inc · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Unihealth Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Every dot is one organisation LAMP INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Through Plinth
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE CENTER AT BLESSED SACRAMENT.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.6× since.
US 501(c)(3); EIN 203022534 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on THE CENTER AT BLESSED SACRAMENT, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
Find your warmest path to Lamp Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.