· Public charity
The People Concern
THE PEOPLE CONCERN believes no one should have to live on the street or in an abusive household.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $1,337,266 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $12,014,583 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,677,317 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $29k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $709k
- $250k+1 grant · $600k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LOS ANGELES CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER | $599,648 |
| VENICE FAMILY CLINIC | $242,563 |
| SABAN COMMUNITY CLINIC | $162,932 |
| THE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD | $125,500 |
| PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS | $109,502 |
| EXODUS RECOVERY INC | $68,284 |
| ANTELOPE VALLEY PARTNERS FOR HEALTH | $28,837 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $13.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD6× · 2020–2025 · $5.3M · revenue +101% · 55% of their budget
- HHHomeless Health Care Los Angeles4× · 2020–2023 · $3.8M · revenue +117%
LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER4× · 2020–2023 · $3.3M · revenue +35%
Funded once
- LILAMP INCone grant, 2018 · $1.9M · revenue -7%
- RUREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIAone grant, 2022 · $35k
- MSMEDICAL STAFFING NETWORKone grant, 2024 · $22k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The roots of the los angeles didi hirsch psychiatric service dba didi hirsch mental health services ("dhmhs") extend back to the 1930s, when a group of women funded psychiatric care for people whose lives were devastated by the depression.…
The specific purposes of this organization are:(a) to provide outpatient primary health service in underserved areas and/or for medically underserved populations as a community clinic. (b) to develop, promote, and manage health care…
Our Vision is to enhance the educational and economic well-being of the people we serve by means of direct human services, advocacy, and referrals.Our Mission is to save lives, unite families, and protect the community through addiction…
We work to end homelessness through housing solutions, supportive services, and connection to community. we advocate for equitable and just systems that ensure all individuals and families will have a safe place they can call home.
TCC Family Health mission is to provide innovative, integrated, quality health care that will contribute to a healthy community, focusing on those in need and working with patients and the community as partners in their overall well-being.
The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…
Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids
The midnight mission seeks to offer a bridge to self sufficiency for people experiencing homelessness through interim shelter, advocacy, education, training and job placement, make available the necessities of life, offer the 12-step…
Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.
To give hope and change lives. we do this by offering a continuum of prevention, intervention, behavioral health and wellness services to adults and families throughout california. these services aim to reduce costs of societal problems by…
To lift people of out homelessness, one person, one family at a time.
Covenant house is dedicated to serving all of god's children with absolute respect and unconditional love to help youth experiencing homelessness and to protect and safeguard all youth in need.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Los Angeles Free Clinic and the most unlike its peers is Exodus Foundation for Recovery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD ↗
- Who funds Homeless Health Care Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds LAMP INC ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
- Who funds THE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds PATH ↗
- Who funds ANTELOPE VALLEY PARTNERS FOR HEALTH ↗
- Who funds EXODUS FOUNDATION FOR RECOVERY ↗
- Who funds CLAREMATRIX ↗
- Who funds SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · California Community Foundation · Lamp Inc · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · Shelter Partnership Inc · United Way Inc · The Rose Hills Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The People Concern funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.