Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Community foundation

The Mayor's Fund for Los Angeles

THE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES is currently developing and supporting programs to help prevent angelenos from falling into homelessness and experiencing housing insecurity through outreach, case management, and expansion of legal services.

$2.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$935k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Youth Development$8.7MHousing & Shelter$3.1MHealth$2.2MHuman Services$2.2MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.9MCrime & Legal$1.9MCommunity Improvement$1.8MEducation$1.7MOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $122k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $325k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.2M
$125,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EVICTION DEFENSE NETWORK$935,000
ESPERANZA COMMUNITY HOUSING$743,825
ST JOHNS WELLNESS CENTER$500,000
CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER$200,000
RIGHTWAY FOUNDATION$125,000
CHIRLA$37,000
LA VOICE$32,860
WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES$27,052
BETTER ANGELS$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CARINA: $24k → 9%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $26k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $16k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $9k → 14%1736 FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $12k → 14%1736 FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $10k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $8k → 14%HOMELESS HEALTH CARE LOS ANGELES: $60k → 14%KOREATOWN YOUTH & COMMUNITY CENTER: $8k → 14%BETTER ANGELS: $25k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $8k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $262k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $204k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $44k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $33k → 14%WATTS LABOR COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE: $10k → 14%JENESSE CENTER INC: $188k → 14%JENESSE CENTER INC: $99k → 14%BRYANT TEMPLE AME CHURCH: $19k → 14%RAINBOW SERVICES LTD: $75k → 14%RAINBOW SERVICES LTD: $42k → 14%ILM FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $10k → 14%EL CENTRO DEL PUEBLO: $10k → 14%MY FRIEND'S HOUSE FOUNDATION: $55k → 14%MY FRIEND'S HOUSE FOUNDATION: $35k → 14%SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS: $25k → 14%CHILD CARE ALLIANCE OF LOS ANGELES: $200k → 14%ALL PEOPLES COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 14%MY FRIEND'S HOUSE FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%INNERCITY STRUGGLE: $8k → 14%YWCA: $505k → 14%THE LOS ANGELES FOUNDATION ON AGING: $50k → 14%YWCA: $8k → 14%THE CHILDREN'S COLLECTIVE INC: $10k → 14%FREEFROM: $25k → 14%CENTRAL CITY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERS: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$19M · 36 repeat orgs$8.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.

36 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
93

Total granted

$19M
$7.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+36%

Still filing today

86%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $710k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    ESPERANZA COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +16%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR THE LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGES
    4× · 2018–2023 · $1.0M · revenue ×16 · 73% of their budget
  • O
    ONEGENERATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $559k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF LOS ANGELES BUREAU OF ENGINEERING
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M
  • CO
    CITY OF LOS ANGELES - ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2020 · $747k
  • DC
    DIGNITY COMMUNITY CAREgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $675k · revenue +36%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…

—
2
Latino Business Chamber of Greater La Foundation Inc

To facilitate economic structures and policy initiatives that empower Latino business development and foster economic growth across Los Angeles.

Human Services
3
Community Development Technologies Center

To build livable and economically viable communities in the low income areas of This is accomplished by Greater Los Angeles strengthening the skils and self-sufficiency of residents, businesses of residents, businesses and community…

Community Improvement
4
Los Angeles Black Worker Center

The mission of the Los Angeles Black Worker Center is to increase access to quality jobs, reduce employment discrimination, and improve industries that employ black workers through action and unionization.

Employment
5
Instituto De Educacion Popular Del Sur De California

strengthening the leadership and workforce skills of Day Laborers and Domestic Workers. through 5 Day Labor Centers, Workers Health Program & Mujeres en Accion using Education & outreach empowerment tools

Unclassified
6
Cooperation L a

The L.A. Co-op Lab is a collective that builds capacity for worker ownership in Los Angeles as a pathway toward a more equitable and democratic economy.

Arts & Culture
7
Los Angeles Business Council Formerly Known As West La Chamber of Commerce

The los angeles business council, labc, serves the los angeles community by providing public education, awareness to community issues, advocacy of sustainable development, workforce housing and business development.

—
8
Economic Development Corporation of Los Angeles County

The function of the corporation shall be to ease the burdens of government by assisting, implementing, supporting and/or contributing to the support of programs, projects and activities of a public nature. which are directed toward…

—
9
Los Angeles Conservation Corps

The la conservation corps creates equitable opportunities for young people to build resilience in themselves, their communities and the environment through a program of work, education and support.

Employment
10
Central City Association of Los Angeles

Devoted to promoting the economic health and quality of life in la, particularly downtown los angeles. cca provides business advocacy in sharing public policy on a broad range of issues before the citycouncil, the county board of…

—
11
League of Women Voters of Los Angeles

The League of Women Voters, a nonpartisan political organization, encourages informed and active participation in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and…

—
12
Town Hall Los Angeles

To present issues that affect the los angeles community and provide a platform for the discussion of solutions from a nonpartisan point of view.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%3%<5yr16%5%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr17%29%20–35yr10%32%35–55yr12%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%8%<5yr16%4%5–10yr20%42%10–20yr17%18%20–35yr10%19%35–55yr12%10%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%1/128
the rest of the field
16%
7,866/49,688

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

120 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 120 of the 138 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
31
Early backer (in before they grew)
117/120
Grantees still filing
89/120
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE GRYD FOUNDATION — $7,822,487 · Youth DevelopmentTHE GRYD FOUNDATION+4 more — $312,146 · Youth DevelopmentCITY OF LOS ANGELES BUREAU OF ENGINEERING — $1,000,000 · OtherCITY OF LOS ANGELES BUREAU OF ENGINEERINGCITY OF LOS ANGELES — $779,253 · OtherCITY OF LOS ANGELESCITY OF LOS ANGELES - ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT — $746,544 · OtherCITY OF LOS ANGELES - ECONOMIC AND WORKFOR…CITY OF LOS ANGELES MAYORS OFFICE OF BUDGET & INNOVATION — $597,031 · OtherCITY OF LOS ANGELES MAYORS OFFICE OF BUDGE…ONEGENERATION — $558,899 · OtherONEGENERATIONCITY OF LOS ANGELES EWDD — $490,000 · OtherCITY OF LOS ANGELES MOBI — $488,359 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA — $450,000 · OtherCITY OF LOS ANGELES BOE — $425,000 · OtherHaven Hills Inc — $408,254 · OtherST JOHN'S COMMUNITY HEALTH — $500,000 · OtherSocial Impact Fund — $443,351 · Other+66 more — $3,573,880 · Other+66 morePARA LOS NINOS — $542,939 · Human ServicesPARA LOS …YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES — $513,333 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOM…Jenesse Center Inc — $286,454 · Human ServicesJenesse C…CHILD CARE ALLIANCE OF LOS ANGELES — $200,000 · Human ServicesCHILD CAR…RAINBOW SERVICES — $117,148 · Human ServicesMY FRIENDS HOUSE FOUNDATION — $105,000 · Human Services+21 more — $433,218 · Human Services+21 moreESPERANZA COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION — $1,849,187 · Housing & ShelterCENTER FOR THE PACIFIC-ASIAN FAMILY INC — $72,402 · Housing & Shelter+2 more — $32,000 · Housing & ShelterFOUNDATION FOR THE LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGES — $1,008,085 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $300,000 · EducationEXPANDED LEARNING ALLIANCE — $295,460 · EducationLA'S BEST — $132,000 · EducationLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $75,000 · Education+5 more — $79,893 · EducationEVICTION DEFENSE NETWORK — $1,360,000 · Crime & LegalCOALITION TO ABOLISH SLAVERY & TRAFFICKING — $163,464 · Crime & Legal+1 more — $10,000 · Crime & LegalDIGNITY COMMUNITY CARE — $675,000 · HealthWhite Memorial Med Cntr Charitable Fdtn Adventist Health White Memorial Ch Fdtn — $175,000 · HealthEAST LOS ANGELES WOMEN'S CENTER — $173,150 · HealthGlendale Adventist Medical Center Fdtn Adventist Health Glendale Foundation — $125,000 · HealthPasadena Hospital Association Ltd — $125,000 · HealthSOCIAL MODEL RECOVERY SYSTEMS INC — $70,000 · Health+5 more — $96,508 · Health
Youth Development$8,134,633Other$10,460,571Human Services$2,198,092Housing & Shelter$1,953,589Education$1,890,438Crime & Legal$1,533,464Health$1,439,658

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE GRYD FOUNDATION — $7,822,487 over 5y, 85% of budgetESPERANZA COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION — $1,849,187 over 3y, 13% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGES — $1,008,085 over 4y, 73% of budgetDIGNITY COMMUNITY CARE — $675,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONEGENERATION — $558,899 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetPARA LOS NINOS — $542,939 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES — $513,333 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSocial Impact Fund — $443,351 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetHaven Hills Inc — $408,254 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S LAW CENTER OF CALIFORNIA — $335,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $300,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEXPANDED LEARNING ALLIANCE — $295,460 over 1y, 17% of budgetJenesse Center Inc — $286,454 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREATER LOS ANGELES — $236,313 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetCHILD CARE ALLIANCE OF LOS ANGELES — $200,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS — $200,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWhite Memorial Med Cntr Charitable Fdtn Adventist Health White Memorial Ch Fdtn — $175,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetEAST LOS ANGELES WOMEN'S CENTER — $173,150 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCOALITION TO ABOLISH SLAVERY & TRAFFICKING — $163,464 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetHOME AT LAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $159,669 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTHE URBAN INSTITUTE — $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPACIFIC ASIAN CONSORTIUM IN EMPLOYMENT — $140,464 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLOS ANGELES CLEANTECH INCUBATOR — $139,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLA'S BEST — $132,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetThe Rightway Foundation — $125,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetGlendale Adventist Medical Center Fdtn Adventist Health Glendale Foundation — $125,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetPasadena Hospital Association Ltd — $125,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSU CASA - ENDING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $124,200 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetRAINBOW SERVICES — $117,148 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetURBAN ALCHEMY — $105,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMY FRIENDS HOUSE FOUNDATION — $105,000 over 3y, 31% of budgetPEACE OVER VIOLENCE — $92,308 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetINITIATING CHANGE IN OUR NEIGHBORHOODS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $84,375 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetLOS ANGELES PARKS FOUNDATION — $83,050 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION — $81,120 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR THE PACIFIC-ASIAN FAMILY INC — $72,402 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSOCIAL MODEL RECOVERY SYSTEMS INC — $70,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $62,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHomeless Health Care Los Angeles — $60,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS — $52,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON FOUNDATION — $51,666 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT-SLAUSON LDC INC — $50,521 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER — $50,023 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL — $50,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES FOUNDATION ON AGING — $50,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetUNITE-LA INC — $41,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetURBAN TXT TEENS EXPLORING TECHNOLOGY — $35,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ralph M Parsons F…California Community …Weingart FoundationUnited Way IncThe Annenberg Foundat…The Rose Hills Founda…Shelter Partnership I…The California Endowm…Baby2babyKaiser Foundation Hos…The Ahmanson Foundati…The California Wellne…
The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA87.4× affinity45 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · California Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · United Way Inc · The Annenberg Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Shelter Partnership Inc · The California Endowment · Baby2baby · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Ahmanson Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Mayor's Fund for Los Angeles funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    45report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 138 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines