· Private foundation
The Justin and Michelle Hughes Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAINT IGNATIUS HIGH SCHOOL | $15,750 |
| Letters To Santa Charity | $9,750 |
| Voice of San Francisco | $2,500 |
| Oberlin College | $2,000 |
| San Francisco Baseball Acadment | $1,150 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| City Hope of San Francisco | $1,000 |
| Jazz Foundation of America | $1,000 |
| All Stars Project | $1,000 |
| Saint Josephs Art Foundation | $500 |
| Little League Baseball | $500 |
| Project Alianza | $250 |
| Junipero Serra High School | $100 |
| Movember | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PGPROJECT GLIMMER5× · 2017–2023 · $5k · revenue +936%
- ASALL STARS PROJECT INC4× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +50%
- COChildren of Shelters3× · 2017–2019 · $5k · revenue +15%
Funded once
- SFSEAL-NSW FAMILY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +1%
- SFSEAL FUTURE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -1%
- TCTUESDAY'S CHILDRENone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -18%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bar association of san francisco champions equal access to justice and promotes humanity, excellence, and diversity in the legal profession. we provide legal services to disadvantaged and underserved individuals in san francisco. we…
A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.
Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…
The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…
To provide athletic opportunities to the youth of san francisco bay area by providing low cost opportunities to learn, play and participate in soccer by obtaining training in clinics, play and participate in leagues and tournaments.
SFFILM is a nonprofit organization whose mission ensures independent voices in film are welcomed, heard, and given the resources to thrive. SFFILM connects and inspires audiences, students and teachers, and filmmakers through our film…
To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.
The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of San Francisco and the most unlike its peers is City Hope San Francisco. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
80 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 80 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds SEAL-NSW FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LETTERS TO SANTA CHARITY ↗
- Who funds PROJECT GLIMMER ↗
- Who funds SEAL FUTURE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALL STARS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds TUESDAY'S CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Children of Shelters ↗
- Who funds SFBA ↗
- Who funds VOICE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC ↗
- Who funds AFRICA FOUNDATION (USA) ↗
- Who funds SUMMER SEARCH ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART ↗
- Who funds CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS ↗
- Who funds Oberlin College ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds SIERRA WATCH ↗
- Who funds BAY AREA DISCOVERY MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds AGAHOZO-SHALOM YOUTH VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds PLAY FLAG FOOTBALL ↗
- Who funds Jazz Foundation of America Inc ↗
- Who funds AIRCRAFT CASUALTY EMOTIONAL SUPPORT SERVICE ↗
- Who funds CITY HOPE SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds JAMESTOWN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds SALESIAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Hymowitz Family Foundation · Olympic Club Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Yelp Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Salesforce Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Justin and Michelle Hughes Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wefam United Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.