· Public charity
Olympic Club Foundation
Our mission is to financially support programs which share our belief that participation in organized athletics enriches young lives and develops future community leaders.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 76 grants below total $878,082 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,023,297 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $145,215 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k17 grants · $129k
- $10k–50k59 grants · $749k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S ACTIVITIES LEAGUE | $20,000 |
| SF FLAME | $20,000 |
| ST PETER'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL | $20,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA | $20,000 |
| MIRACLE LEAGUE OF SAN FRANCISCO PENINSULA | $20,000 |
| FIRE IN THE RING | $20,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO BROWN BOMBERS INC | $18,500 |
| SOCCER WITHOUT BORDERS OAKLAND | $16,000 |
| WOLVERINES RUGBY CLUB | $15,000 |
| OAKLAND GENESIS | $15,000 |
| BAY AREA SCORES DBA AMERICA SCORES BAY AREA | $15,000 |
| REAL OPTIONS FOR CITY KIDS | $15,000 |
| JAMESTOWN COMMUNITY CENTER | $15,000 |
| HAYWARD AGGIES YOUTH FOOTBALL AND CHEER | $15,000 |
| CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $292k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
80 repeat relationships — 54 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $214k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SLSAN LEANDRO BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC3× · 2020–2024 · $93k · revenue +560%
- JCJewish Commmunity High School of the Bay6× · 2018–2024 · $89k · revenue +26%
- YTYOUTH TENNIS ADVANTAGE6× · 2018–2024 · $88k · revenue +60%
Funded once
- CMCamp Maccabi JCC Maccabi Sports Campone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +21%
- SHSacred Heart Cathedral Preparatoryone grant, 2018 · $20k
- KBKIPP BAY AREA SCHOOLSgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $16k · revenue +120%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Youth sports
San Francisco United Soccer Club teaches girls and boys to play the game of soccer with skills well-honed through hard work and patient coaching. The Club fosters collaboration and teamwork bolstered by warm on- and off-the-field…
To provide children and girls within Northern California with the opportunity to develop character by interacting with other children in sports activities and to provide them with educational guidance and assistance.
Norcal aquatics is a distinguished youth sports program dedicated to serving the communities of los altos, mountain view, palo alto in the bay area, and the santa cruz water polo and swimming communities. we cater to athletes of all ages…
The purpose of this Association shall be to develop, promote and administer the game of soccer among youth (boys and girls under nineteen (19) years of age), regardless of race, color religion, age, sex, or national origin within territory…
Training, coaching and operating a youth swim team
It is the mission of srcysc to provide the youth of riverside county with equal opportunities for those of all genders and ages to engage and take active part in personal fitness, teamwork, athletic competition and self esteem building…
Provides youth soccer development and amateur athletic competition through coaching, training and competition.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of San Francisco and the most unlike its peers is Prime Athletic Performance the Real Nine Football Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
123 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 123 of the 169 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFFS ACTIVITIES LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds SAN LEANDRO BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds Jewish Commmunity High School of the Bay ↗
- Who funds YOUTH TENNIS ADVANTAGE ↗
- Who funds BRANDEIS HILLEL DAY SCHOOL - MARIN ↗
- Who funds HAYWARD AGGIES YOUTH FOOTBALL AND CHEER PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds San Francisco Brown Bombers Pop Warner Club ↗
- Who funds Oakland Lacrosse Club ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds SOCCER WITHOUT BORDERS ↗
- Who funds BAY AREA SCORES ↗
- Who funds Ultimate Impact Inc ↗
- Who funds EPA Peninsula Rugby Football Club ↗
- Who funds GIRLVENTURES ↗
- Who funds OSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE FIRST BASE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF OAKLAND ↗
- Who funds Oakland Genesis DBA Oakland Genesis Soccer Club ↗
- Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC ↗
- Who funds SALESIAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds Bay Area Womens Sports Initiative ↗
- Who funds San Mateo Police Activities League Inc ↗
- Who funds Redwood City Police Activities League Inc ↗
- Who funds SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFFS ACTIVITIES LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds Pomeroy Recreation and Rehabilitation Center ↗
- Who funds San Rafael High School Boosters Inc ↗
- Who funds Rich May Foundation ↗
- Who funds RUNNING FOR A BETTER OAKLAND ↗
- Who funds Oaklantis Swim Team ↗
- Who funds City Surf Project ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY SAN JOSE HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SF FLAME INC ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Bothin Foundation · Quest Foundation · Odell Rs & Hp Fund Tua-Main · The San Francisco Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Carl Gellert and Celia Berta Gellert Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The Joseph & Mercedes McMicking Foundation · Trust Funds Incorporated · East Bay Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Olympic Club Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wefam United Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.