· Private foundation
The James J and Joan a Gardner Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k16 grants · $60k
- $10k–50k43 grants · $915k
- $50k–250k35 grants · $2.8M
- $250k+7 grants · $4.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER | $1,500,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION | $875,000 |
| ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI (CINCINNATI ZOO & BOTANICAL GARDEN) | $800,000 |
| ACCELERATE GREAT SCHOOLS | $664,240 |
| GREAT PARKS FOREVER | $500,000 |
| MARY MAGDALEN FOUNDATION INC | $300,000 |
| XAVIER JESUIT ACADEMY | $250,000 |
| ACCELERATE GREAT SCHOOLS | $177,975 |
| KENZIE'S CLOSET | $150,000 |
| CINCINNATI WORKS INC | $150,000 |
| LUKE 5 ADVENTURES | $145,000 |
| TRI-STATE TRAILS | $125,000 |
| SISTERS OF NOTRE DAME DE NAMUR OHIO PROVINCE | $100,000 |
| CAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC | $100,000 |
| THE CHILDREN'S THEATRE OF CINCINNATI | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.
92 repeat relationships — 54 still active in FY2024, 38 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $17M · revenue +30%
- ZSZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI7× · 2017–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +41%
- GPGREAT PARKS FOREVER3× · 2022–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +298% · 37% of their budget
Funded once
- ESEASTER SEALS TRISTATE (EASTERSEALS SERVING GREATER CINCINNATI)one grant, 2021 · $250k
- SOSISTERS OF NOTRE DAME DE NAMURone grant, 2017 · $200k
- GUGREEN UMBRELLAone grant, 2023 · $125k · revenue -32%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
To empower Cincinnati entrepreneurs to launch bold, scalable startups; and we work to improve the odds of those startups growing into transformational companies.
Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…
As a trusted and connected partner, we inspire generous people to invest in a more equitable and vibrant region now and for generations to come.
Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.
To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.
We are the premier childrens mental health agency that reduces the suffering experienced by children who have emotional problems related to depression, anxiety, and behavior like adhd. untreated, these problems can lead to failure in…
United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…
To develop and promote economic development, talent initiatives and the unique offerings in the cincinnati region.
Cincinnati children's hospital medical center will be the leader in improving child health. cincinnati children's will provide child health and transform delivery of care through fully integrated, globally recognized research, education,…
To grow the vibrancy and economic prosperity of the cincinnati region.
The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Oh Ky & in and the most unlike its peers is The Mary Magdalen Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
146 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 146 of the 202 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ACCELERATE GREAT SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds THE MARY MAGDALEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds GREAT PARKS FOREVER ↗
- Who funds HOPE IGNITES CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Parks Foundation ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI WORKS ↗
- Who funds Orlando Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER ↗
- Who funds LUKE5ADVENTURES ↗
- Who funds Valley Hope Association Foundation ↗
- Who funds THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds Friars Club Inc ↗
- Who funds The Children's Theatre of Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds MUSIC HALL REVITALIZATION COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds LA SOUPE INC ↗
- Who funds Pregnancy Resource Connection Inc ↗
- Who funds Bethany House Services Inc ↗
- Who funds ProKids ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds KENZIE'S CLOSET ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE RENTER EQUITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE MEDICAL CENTER AT OCEAN REEF INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR ADDICTION TREATMENT F/K/A THE CENTER FOR CHEMICAL ADDICTIONS ↗
- Who funds CAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Marge & Charles J Schott Foundation · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Hcs Foundation · Farmer Family Foundation · Edelweiss Foundation · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Sutphin Family Foundation Ica · Louise Taft Semple Foundation · Millstone Fund · Andrew Jergens Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The James J and Joan a Gardner Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc — 16% of income from government
- Star of the Sea Foundation Inc — 8% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The James J and Joan a Gardner Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The James J and Joan a Gardner Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.