Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

The Jewish Federations of North America Inc

The federation movement protects and enhances the well-being of jews worldwide through the values of tikkun olam (repairing the world), tzedakah (charity and social justice) and torah (jewish learning).

$445M
Granted FY2025still arriving
204
Grants FY2025still arriving
35
States reached
$344M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

International$2.3BPhilanthropy$56MPublic Safety & Disaster$44MHuman Services$27MEducation$14MEmployment$6.2MHealth$2.7MReligion$2.4MOther$0
02FY2025 · 204 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 204 grants below total $432,669,720 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $445,142,210 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $12,472,490 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k44 grants · $281k
  • $10k–50k36 grants · $951k
  • $50k–250k92 grants · $10.0M
  • $250k+32 grants · $421M
$75,000
Median grant
35
States reached
$430M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED ISRAEL APPEAL INC$344,493,710
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTR COMMITTEE$58,815,671
SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC$3,021,400
AMERICAN ORT$2,316,802
KAVOD$2,000,000
NETWORK OF JEWISH HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES$950,000
HIAS INC$900,000
SAVE UKRAINE INC$782,400
ISRAAID (US) GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC$600,000
COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF GREATER BOSTON$550,000
MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION$500,000
MILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION$450,000
PROJECT KESHER$450,000
WORLD JEWISH RELIEF$450,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WNC INC$401,961
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $21.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF SILICON VALLEY: $128k → 8%PROJECT LEAD: $129k → 13%Self-help Community Services Inc: $479k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WNC INC: $402k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $192k → 22%PROJECT LEAD INC: $100k → 13%Selfhelp Community Services Inc: $359k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SVC OF FAMILY OF METRO DETROIT: $158k → 8%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CINCINNATI: $250k → 16%NETWORK OF JEWISH HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES: $950k → 7%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $313k → 14%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC (NY): $253k → 17%Jewish Family Service of metropolitan Detroit: $105k → 8%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CINCINNATI: $125k → 16%NETWORK OF JEWISH HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES: $926k → 7%Jewish Family and Childrens Services: $142k → 10%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $148k → 17%NETWORK OF JEW HUMAN SEVICE AGENCIES: $400k → 7%OHEL CHILDREN'S HOME & FAMILY SERVICES: $175k → 13%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $135k → 17%NETWORK OF JEWISH HUMAN SERVICE AGENCY: $309k → 7%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $500k → 22%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $115k → 17%NETWORK OF JEWISH HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES: $208k → 7%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $250k → 22%MJHS HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE: $131k → 20%NETWORK OF JEWISH HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES: $205k → 7%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHOENIX: $100k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $152k → 22%NETWORK OF JEWISH HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES: $205k → 7%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $125k → 22%NETWORK OF JEWISH HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES: $141k → 7%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $125k → 22%MORSELIFELOLA & SAUL KRAMER SENIOR SERVICES AGENC: $104k → 11%NETWORK OF JEW HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES (NJHSA): $127k → 7%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF GREATER PHI: $105k → 22%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF GREATER PHI: $105k → 22%KAVOD: $2.0M → 12%KAVOD - Ensuring Dignity for Holocause Survivors: $1.5M → 12%Alpert Jewish Family AND Childrens Service: $142k → 11%Jewish Social Service Agency Eaglebank: $211k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $225k → 14%The Blue Card Inc: $110k → 17%Metropolitan NY Coordinating Council on Jewish Poverty: $188k → 17%Metropolitan New York Coordinating Council on Jewish Poverty: $131k → 17%YOUNG MENS AND YOUNG WOMENS HEBREW ASSOCIATION OF: $135k → 17%METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY INC: $131k → 17%DOROT INC: $120k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
WA
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4B · 141 repeat orgs$4.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

141 repeat relationships — 63 still active in FY2025, 78 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

141
79

Total granted

$2.4B
$2.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+30%

Still filing today

93%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationInternationalReligionPhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UI
    UNITED ISRAEL APPEAL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.9B · revenue +110% · 99% of their budget
  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $357M · revenue +24%
  • SC
    SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $29M · revenue ×22 · 76% of their budget

Funded once

  • CL
    CHABAD LUBAVITCH CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $200k
  • HC
    HEBREW CONGREGATION OF ST THOMAS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $191k
  • NC
    NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOVIET JEWRYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +111% · 47% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Federation of Greater Clifton-Passaic
—
2
University of Judaism Foundation
—
3
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
4
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
—
5
Jewish Family Service

Jewish Family Service is a nonprofit social service organization that supports people of all faiths as they navigate through lifes's challenges - illness, aging , finanical uncertainty, mental health concerns, family problems, or personal…

—
6
Jewish Life Foundation
—
7
Jewish Federation of Greater New Bedford Inc

To foster a vibrant, collaborative jewish community by providing leadership and generating financial resources.

—
8
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
—
9
Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas)
—
10
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
11
The Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati
Philanthropy
12
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service and the most unlike its peers is Older Adults Technology Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsAffordable Housing Construc…Health Access Advocacy and …Lgbtq+ Community SupportImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…Independent K-12 SchoolsFood Banks and PantriesPolicy Research and AdvocacyDevelopmental Disabilities …Jewish Community Organizati…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%2%<5yr14%4%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr19%16%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%44%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr19%2%20–35yr13%1%35–55yr16%97%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.3% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.3%1/356
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,404

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

318 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 318 of the 356 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

15
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
61
Early backer (in before they grew)
315/318
Grantees still filing
232/318
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED ISRAEL APPEAL INC — $1,913,414,422 · InternationalUNITED ISRAEL APPEAL INCThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $357,069,306 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc+4 more — $3,259,900 · InternationalUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $4,778,057 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $2,865,565 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $2,715,322 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ — $2,556,599 · PhilanthropyGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $2,356,364 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC — $2,183,450 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH COMMUNITY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC — $2,047,593 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA — $1,922,007 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $1,754,000 · Philanthropy+65 more — $28,056,623 · PhilanthropyORT AMERICA INC — $19,091,107 · OtherJewish Federation of Greater Houston — $10,121,706 · Other+56 more — $17,969,759 · OtherSECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC — $28,994,901 · Public Safety & DisasterISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC — $1,645,653 · Public Safety & Disaster+2 more — $446,000 · Public Safety & DisasterKAVOD — $3,510,000 · Human ServicesNETWORK OF JEWISH HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES INC — $3,495,319 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $1,821,437 · Human ServicesSELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $1,608,190 · Human ServicesJewish Family Service of the Cincinnati Area — $1,057,492 · Human Services+39 more — $9,693,815 · Human ServicesMENORAH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED AND INFIRM — $825,000 · HealthJEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY — $803,174 · HealthPARKER JEWISH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH CARE AND REHABILITATION — $500,000 · HealthRUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC — $382,860 · HealthCAPE ATLANTIC INK INC — $378,250 · HealthGUARDIANS OF THE SICK INC — $271,343 · HealthCOLORADO HEALTH NETWORK INC — $126,300 · HealthWORLD JEWISH RELIEF USA INC — $1,350,000 · ReligionSAVANNAH JEWISH COUNCIL INC DBA SAVANNAH JEWISH FEDERATION — $252,750 · ReligionUNITED JEWISH COMMUNITY OF THE VIRGINIA PENINSULA INC — $181,446 · ReligionNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOVIET JEWRY — $150,000 · ReligionJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO — $141,734 · ReligionHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $129,128 · ReligionJewish Community Legacy Project Inc — $100,000 · Religion
International$2,273,743,628Philanthropy$51,235,580Other$47,182,572Public Safety & Disaster$31,086,554Human Services$21,186,253Health$3,286,927Religion$2,305,058

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED ISRAEL APPEAL INC — $1,913,414,422 over 9y, 99% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $357,069,306 over 7y, 15% of budgetSECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC — $28,994,901 over 9y, 76% of budgetORT AMERICA INC — $19,091,107 over 8y, 19% of budgetJewish Federation of Greater Houston — $10,121,706 over 7y, 37% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $4,778,057 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetKAVOD — $3,510,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetNETWORK OF JEWISH HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES INC — $3,495,319 over 6y, 26% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $2,865,565 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $2,715,322 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ — $2,556,599 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $2,356,364 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC — $2,183,450 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH COMMUNITY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC — $2,047,593 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA — $1,922,007 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $1,821,437 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $1,754,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC — $1,645,653 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetSELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $1,608,190 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION — $1,510,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY — $1,407,350 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetHIAS INC — $1,376,400 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetProject Kesher — $1,350,000 over 2y, 40% of budgetWORLD JEWISH RELIEF USA INC — $1,350,000 over 2y, 45% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA — $1,340,006 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND — $1,265,600 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetEDITH & CARL MARKS JEWISH COMMUNITY HOUSE BENSONHURST INC — $1,240,731 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetJewish Family Service of the Cincinnati Area — $1,057,492 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS — $989,151 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF GREATER BOSTON INC — $971,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE INC — $937,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetPESACH TIKVAH HOPE DEVELOPMENT INC — $876,622 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetThe Jewish Federation of Greater Baton Rouge — $841,325 over 2y, 49% of budgetLEE COUNTY JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $828,404 over 3y, 60% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF GREATER ROCHESTER NY INC — $825,358 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetMENORAH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED AND INFIRM — $825,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $823,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC — $812,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY — $803,174 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $796,210 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $791,500 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY — $789,747 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF CENTRAL NJ — $783,170 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $763,216 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARTFORD — $749,078 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $735,501 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetSHALOM AUSTIN — $724,708 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetJewish Federation of St Louis — $686,625 over 5y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Harold Grinspoon …Conference on Jewish …Sephardic Home for th…United Jewish Appeal-…Seed the Dream Founda…Network of Jewish Hum…Jewish Community Cent…Jewish Federation of …Hillel the Foundation…The Jewish Federation…Maccabee Task Force F…Jewish Communal Fund
The Harold Grinspoon FoundationMA119.2× affinity63 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Harold Grinspoon Foundation · Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany Inc · Sephardic Home for the Aged Foundation Dba the Sephardic Foundation on Aging · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Seed the Dream Foundation · Network of Jewish Human Service Agencies Inc · Jewish Community Centers Association of North America · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life · The Jewish Federation of Greater Washington Inc · Maccabee Task Force Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Jewish Federations of North America Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 240%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
  • Jewish Family Services of Greenwich — 41% of income from government
  • Lola & Saul Kramer Senior Services Agency Inc — 21% of income from government
  • Gulf Coast Jewish Family and Community Services Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
  • Jewish Federation of Delaware Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Tampa Jccfederation Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Jewish Family Service of Stamford Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Shalom Orlando Inc — 2% of income from government
  • The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc — 1% of income from government
  • The Jewish Federation of Greater New Haven Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Jewish Community Services of South Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Jewish Social Service Agency — 1% of income from government
  • Jewish Family Service Agency of Central Nj — 1% of income from government
  • Jewish Family & Children's Services of Northern New Jersey Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Cadena Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
24get no government money at all
60report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 356 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home