· Private foundation
The Gerald B Shreiber Foundation
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k118 grants · $271k
- $10k–50k29 grants · $559k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $824k
- $250k+2 grants · $905k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $655,000 |
| RUTGERS U - SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING | $250,000 |
| CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL | $100,000 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LA | $100,000 |
| AWF SNIFFING DOG PROGRAM | $100,000 |
| MAKING OF MIRACLE STORIES ANIMAL RESCUE | $90,000 |
| WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC | $84,000 |
| AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| WILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES | $50,000 |
| THE FOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTISEMITISM | $50,000 |
| PENNSYLVANIA SPCA | $50,000 |
| ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA | $50,000 |
| AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| ZOA | $50,000 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF ATLANTIC AND CAPE MAY | $38,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $275k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
208 repeat relationships — 111 still active in FY2022, 97 since wound down; 45 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $996k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RUROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC2× · 2019–2020 · $2.7M · revenue +51%
- WCWILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES5× · 2017–2022 · $700k · revenue +64%
- PSPennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals6× · 2017–2022 · $356k · revenue +65%
Funded once
- RERUTGERS ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENTAL OFFICEone grant, 2018 · $100k
- AHAmerican Heart Association Incgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +33%
- CSCULTURE SOURCE - GREATER PHILADELPHIAone grant, 2019 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To rescue at risk k-9s from asia.
A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.
Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.
Animal Dominion Rescue is a non-profit organization dedicated to rescuing cats and dogs worldwide, ensuring they find permanent, loving homes. The organization emphasizes direct support to rescuers on the ground, promoting animal welfare,…
Animal Welfare
Animal Welfare
All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Defenders of Animal Rights Inc and the most unlike its peers is Red Bucket Equine Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
176 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 176 of the 337 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES ↗
- Who funds AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals ↗
- Who funds Animal Welfare Association Inc ↗
- Who funds NJ AID FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND ↗
- Who funds Joybound People and Pets FKA Tony La Russa's Animal Rescue Foundation ↗
- Who funds WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Society For Companion Animals ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF ATLANTIC AND CAPE MAY COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL HUMANE EDUCATION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds MAKING OF MIRACLE STORIES ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds KELLMAN BROWN ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds STRAYDOG INC ↗
- Who funds PACT ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC ↗
- Who funds ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds NELLIES SCHOOLHOUSE ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY ↗
- Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · Bradford Family Foundation · Seckinger Foundation Corporation · Joyce a Ward Foundation · The Susan and Ford Schumann Foundation · The Patricia Florence Miller Trust · Paula Knickerbocker Foundation Inc · Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc Foundation · Bernard Weinberg Foundation · Duncans and Tuquis Legacy Organization Dba Datlo · Susan & Jerome Ettelson Fund · John R Oltman Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Gerald B Shreiber Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Center for Family Services — 73% of income from government
- Acenda Inc Dba Acenda Integrated Health — 69% of income from government
- Food Bank of South Jersey Inc — 30% of income from government
- Marine Mammal Stranding Center — 10% of income from government
- Young Israel of Margate — 3% of income from government
- People for Animals Inc — 1% of income from government
- Rowan University Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Gerald B Shreiber Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Gerald B Shreiber Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.