Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Gerald B Shreiber Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.6M
Granted FY2022
161
Grants FY2022
23
States reached
$655k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Education$4.9MAnimals$2.6MHealth$2.0MInternational$377kPhilanthropy$335kHuman Services$292kReligion$267kArts & Culture$63kOther$0
02FY2022 · 161 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k118 grants · $271k
  • $10k–50k29 grants · $559k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $824k
  • $250k+2 grants · $905k
$2,500
Median grant
23
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$655,000
RUTGERS U - SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING$250,000
CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL$100,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LA$100,000
AWF SNIFFING DOG PROGRAM$100,000
MAKING OF MIRACLE STORIES ANIMAL RESCUE$90,000
WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC$84,000
AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY$50,000
WILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES$50,000
THE FOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTISEMITISM$50,000
PENNSYLVANIA SPCA$50,000
ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA$50,000
AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY$50,000
ZOA$50,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF ATLANTIC AND CAPE MAY$38,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $275k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CORTNEY'S PLACE: $5k → 11%ORPHAN ACRES: $1k → 16%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $1k → 10%GUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS: $1k → 16%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $500 → 8%CORTNEY'S PLACE: $5k → 11%ORPHAN ACRES: $500 → 16%SUNRISE DAY CAMP ASSOCIATION: $500 → 6%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $1k → 10%GUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS: $500 → 16%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $500 → 8%CORTNEY'S PLACE: $5k → 11%ORPHAN ACRES: $500 → 16%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $52k → 6%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $750 → 10%COURTNEY'S PLACE: $5k → 11%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $30k → 6%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $750 → 10%CORTNEY'S PLACE: $5k → 11%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $30k → 6%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $500 → 10%CORTNEYS PLACE: $5k → 11%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $27k → 6%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $500 → 10%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $20k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $20k → 6%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $5k → 14%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $5k → 14%BANCROFT: $5k → 12%BANCROFT: $5k → 12%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS OF AMERICA: $500 → 15%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS OF AMERICA: $500 → 15%PAWS & AFFECTION: $500 → 7%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS OF AMERICA: $500 → 15%PAWS & AFFECTION: $500 → 7%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS OF AMERICA: $500 → 15%PAWS & AFFECTION: $11k → 7%NEW LEASH ON LIFE USA: $1k → 7%ROBIN'S NEST INC: $2k → 8%ROBIN'S NEST INC: $2k → 8%ROBIN'S NEST INC: $2k → 8%PAWS & AFFECTION: $500 → 7%PROJECT HOME: $10k → 22%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
ID
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
IN
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 208 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

208 repeat relationships — 111 still active in FY2022, 97 since wound down; 45 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

208
78

Total granted

$11M
$364k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+31%

Still filing today

60%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $996k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RU
    ROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2.7M · revenue +51%
  • WC
    WILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES
    5× · 2017–2022 · $700k · revenue +64%
  • PS
    Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
    6× · 2017–2022 · $356k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • RE
    RUTGERS ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENTAL OFFICE
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +33%
  • CS
    CULTURE SOURCE - GREATER PHILADELPHIA
    one grant, 2019 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
Asian Dogs Rescue Allies

To rescue at risk k-9s from asia.

Animals
3
Raskels Rescue
Animals
4
The Adoptable Dog
Animals
5
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
6
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
7
Canine Estates Inc
Animals
8
Pet Rescue Miami Inc
Animals
9
Animal Dominion Rescue

Animal Dominion Rescue is a non-profit organization dedicated to rescuing cats and dogs worldwide, ensuring they find permanent, loving homes. The organization emphasizes direct support to rescuers on the ground, promoting animal welfare,…

Animals
10
Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

Animal Welfare

11
Anas Safe Haven Rescue Inc

Animal Welfare

Animals
12
All About Animals Rescue

All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Defenders of Animal Rights Inc and the most unlike its peers is Red Bucket Equine Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Jewish Community Organizati…Food Banks and PantriesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Affordable Housing Developm…Cancer Support ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Youth Sports ProgramsEquine Therapy ProgramsYouth Development CentersLocal Food System Organizat…Local History MuseumsHealth Access Advocacy and …Developmental Disabilities …Animal Rescue and ShelterCommunity FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%52%35–55yr16%23%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/188
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,377

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

176 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 176 of the 337 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
44
Early backer (in before they grew)
174/176
Grantees still filing
138/176
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $1,657,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONCHOP FOUNDATION — $605,000 · OtherCHOP FOUNDATIONROWAN UNIVERSITY — $425,000 · OtherROWAN UNIVERSITYVIRTUA FOUNDATION — $250,000 · OtherRUTGERS U - SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING — $250,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE ISRAELI DEFENSE FORCES — $210,000 · Other+98 more — $1,852,649 · Other+98 moreROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,701,000 · EducationROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCWILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES — $700,000 · EducationWILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADESAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC — $450,000 · EducationAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY I…+7 more — $163,500 · EducationPennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals — $356,425 · AnimalsPennsylvania Soci…Animal Welfare Association Inc — $196,000 · AnimalsAnimal Welfare As…NJ AID FOR ANIMALS INC — $180,000 · AnimalsNJ AID FOR ANIMAL…Joybound People and Pets FKA Tony La Russa's Animal Rescue Foundation — $175,000 · AnimalsJoybound People a…WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC — $168,000 · AnimalsWOLF CONSERVATION…Society For Companion Animals — $131,500 · AnimalsSociety For Compa…NATIONAL HUMANE EDUCATION SOCIETY — $120,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL HUMANE E…MAKING OF MIRACLE STORIES ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $90,000 · AnimalsSTRAYDOG INC — $77,000 · AnimalsPACT — $65,000 · Animals+46 more — $362,100 · Animals+46 moreISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $179,000 · Human ServicesTHE SEEING EYE INC — $34,000 · Human ServicesCORTNEYS PLACE — $30,000 · Human ServicesPAWS AND AFFECTION INC — $12,500 · Human ServicesPartnership With Native Americans — $11,000 · Human Services+9 more — $53,100 · Human ServicesJEWISH FEDERATION OF ATLANTIC AND CAPE MAY COUNTIES — $128,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES — $100,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY — $47,930 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $20,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $10,000 · PhilanthropyAmerican Heart Association Inc — $50,000 · HealthNELLIES SCHOOLHOUSE — $49,000 · HealthLANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $20,000 · HealthNATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME CONGRESS — $10,000 · HealthSEASHORE GARDENS FOUNDATION — $9,000 · HealthCystic Fibrosis Research Fund Inc — $8,000 · Health+3 more — $13,000 · HealthCentral Fund of Israel — $100,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $30,000 · International
Other$5,249,649Education$4,014,500Animals$1,921,025Human Services$319,600Philanthropy$305,930Health$159,000International$130,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,701,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetWILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES — $700,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC — $450,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals — $356,425 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetAnimal Welfare Association Inc — $196,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetNJ AID FOR ANIMALS INC — $180,000 over 6y, 41% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $179,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetJoybound People and Pets FKA Tony La Russa's Animal Rescue Foundation — $175,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC — $168,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF ATLANTIC AND CAPE MAY COUNTIES — $128,000 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetNATIONAL HUMANE EDUCATION SOCIETY — $120,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAKING OF MIRACLE STORIES ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $90,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetKELLMAN BROWN ACADEMY — $80,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetSTRAYDOG INC — $77,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetPACT — $65,000 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetFOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNELLIES SCHOOLHOUSE — $49,000 over 6y, 44% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY — $47,930 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $41,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND — $41,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC — $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL AAE INC — $36,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC — $34,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC — $33,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW JERSEY INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTOCKTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCORTNEYS PLACE — $30,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetALMOST HOME ANIMAL SHELTER INC — $27,500 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetCRISIS RESPONSE CANINES — $26,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetThe Fund for Animals Inc — $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $20,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSALEM COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $20,100 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetHOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMDEN COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetOMEGA HORSE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetGREYHOUND FRIENDS OF NEW JERSEY INC — $18,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE — $18,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWOODFORD CEDAR RUN WILDLIFE REFUGE — $16,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetANIMAL DEFENDERS INTERNATIONAL INC US — $13,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetVoorhees Animal Orphanage Inc — $13,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds WILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
  • Who funds Animal Welfare Association Inc
  • Who funds NJ AID FOR ANIMALS INC
  • Who funds ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND
  • Who funds Joybound People and Pets FKA Tony La Russa's Animal Rescue Foundation
  • Who funds WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC
  • Who funds Society For Companion Animals
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF ATLANTIC AND CAPE MAY COUNTIES
  • Who funds NATIONAL HUMANE EDUCATION SOCIETY
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES
  • Who funds MAKING OF MIRACLE STORIES ANIMAL RESCUE INC
  • Who funds KELLMAN BROWN ACADEMY
  • Who funds STRAYDOG INC
  • Who funds PACT
  • Who funds FOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC
  • Who funds ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds NELLIES SCHOOLHOUSE
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PC Fund for Animals Charitable TrWY64.5× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · Bradford Family Foundation · Seckinger Foundation Corporation · Joyce a Ward Foundation · The Susan and Ford Schumann Foundation · The Patricia Florence Miller Trust · Paula Knickerbocker Foundation Inc · Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc Foundation · Bernard Weinberg Foundation · Duncans and Tuquis Legacy Organization Dba Datlo · Susan & Jerome Ettelson Fund · John R Oltman Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Gerald B Shreiber Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 360%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Center for Family Services73% of income from government
  • Acenda Inc Dba Acenda Integrated Health69% of income from government
  • Food Bank of South Jersey Inc30% of income from government
  • Marine Mammal Stranding Center10% of income from government
  • Young Israel of Margate3% of income from government
  • People for Animals Inc1% of income from government
  • Rowan University Foundation Inc0% of income from government
  • Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
36get no government money at all
24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Gerald B Shreiber Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Gerald B Shreiber Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 337 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph