· Private foundation
Duncans and Tuquis Legacy Organization Dba Datlo
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 47% of DUNCANS AND TUQUIS LEGACY ORGANIZATION DBA DATLO’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAVE-A-SATO INC | $200 |
| PROJECT K9 HERO | $150 |
| BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY | $150 |
| Individual grant recipient | $150 |
| THE JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE | $150 |
| Individual grant recipient | $150 |
| PRIDEROCK WILDLIFE REFUGE | $150 |
| SEAN CASEY ANIMAL RESCUE | $150 |
| PETA | $150 |
| UNITED FOR A CAUSE | $150 |
| Individual grant recipient | $150 |
| LITTLE LONGEARS MINIATURE DONKEY RE | $150 |
| NATIONAL ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY | $150 |
| LITTLE SHELTER ANIMAL RESCUE | $150 |
| RETURN TO FREEDOM | $150 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $650) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
87 repeat relationships — 87 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BBBROWNIE BLONDIE FOUNDATION INC5× · 2018–2022 · $3k · revenue +28%
- SCSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE INC5× · 2018–2022 · $950 · revenue +6%
- TATHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS6× · 2017–2022 · $700 · revenue +80%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Animal Welfare
To rescue at risk k-9s from asia.
To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.
World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…
Animal care and rescue
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Second Chance Animal Rescue Inc and the most unlike its peers is Red Bucket Equine Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BROWNIE BLONDIE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAVE A SATO INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Peaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds SPCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC ↗
- Who funds Humane World for Animals International ↗
- Who funds RETURN TO FREEDOM INC ↗
- Who funds Ring Dog Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PAWS OF WAR INC ↗
- Who funds ORPHAN ACRES INC ↗
- Who funds Last Chance for Animals ↗
- Who funds PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS ↗
- Who funds SAVE THE CHIMPS INC ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL RECOVERY MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD CATS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds CASTLETON RANCH HORSE RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · Bradford Family Foundation · Joyce a Ward Foundation · The Susan and Ford Schumann Foundation · Paula Knickerbocker Foundation Inc · Seckinger Foundation Corporation · The Gerald B Shreiber Foundation · Butchkie Foundation Inc · John R Oltman Charitable Foundation · The Patricia Florence Miller Trust · Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc Foundation · Edwin D Marks Animal Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Duncans and Tuquis Legacy Organization Dba Datlo funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.