Skip to content
The Gerald B Shreiber Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Gerald B Shreiber Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Education$4.9MAnimals$2.6MHealth$2.0MInternational$377kPhilanthropy$335kHuman Services$292kReligion$267kArts & Culture$63kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $81k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.3M
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHABAD AT ROWAN UNIVERSITY$750,000
CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL$250,000
ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA$250,000
PENNSYLVANIA SPCA$50,000
INTERNATIONAL AAE$36,000
ISRAEL HERITAGE FOUNDATION$25,000
CANTOR SCOTTS ANIMAL RESCUE$10,000
HARRISON TOWNSHIP PBA LOCAL 178$10,000
DON'T BULLY US RESCUE$5,000
CHABAD OF GLOUCESTER COUNTY$5,000
LILOS PROMISE ANIMAL RESCUE$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $318k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CORTNEY'S PLACE: $5k → 11%ORPHAN ACRES: $1k → 16%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $1k → 10%GUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS: $1k → 16%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $500 → 8%CORTNEY'S PLACE: $5k → 11%ORPHAN ACRES: $500 → 16%SUNRISE DAY CAMP ASSOCIATION: $500 → 6%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $1k → 10%GUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS: $1k → 16%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $500 → 8%CORTNEY'S PLACE: $5k → 11%ORPHAN ACRES: $500 → 16%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $52k → 6%DOGS INC: $1k → 10%GUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS: $500 → 16%COURTNEY'S PLACE: $5k → 11%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $30k → 6%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $750 → 10%CORTNEYS PLACE: $5k → 11%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $30k → 6%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $750 → 10%CORTNEY'S PLACE: $5k → 11%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $30k → 6%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $500 → 10%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $27k → 6%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $500 → 10%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $20k → 6%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $5k → 14%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $20k → 6%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $5k → 14%BANCROFT: $5k → 12%BANCROFT: $5k → 12%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS OF AMERICA: $500 → 15%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS OF AMERICA: $500 → 15%PAWS & AFFECTION: $500 → 7%PAWS & AFFECTION: $500 → 7%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS OF AMERICA: $500 → 15%PAWS & AFFECTION: $11k → 7%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS OF AMERICA: $500 → 15%PAWS & AFFECTION: $10k → 7%NEW LEASH ON LIFE USA: $1k → 7%NEW LEASH ON LIFE USA: $1k → 7%ROBIN'S NEST INC: $2k → 8%ROBIN'S NEST INC: $2k → 8%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 12%PROJECT HOME: $10k → 22%ROBIN'S NEST INC: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
ID
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
IN
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 225 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

225 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 216 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

225
115

Total granted

$14M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+18%

Still filing today

59%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $786k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RU
    ROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2.7M · revenue +51%
  • WC
    WILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES
    5× · 2017–2022 · $700k · revenue +64%
  • CF
    Central Fund of Israel
    3× · 2022–2025 · $600k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • ZM
    ZICHRON MOSEH YITZCHAK M'VILNO CORP
    one grant, 2024 · $250k
  • RU
    RUTGERS U - SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
    one grant, 2022 · $250k
  • AS
    AWF SNIFFING DOG PROGRAM
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
Asian Dogs Rescue Allies

To rescue at risk k-9s from asia.

Animals
3
Raskels Rescue
Animals
4
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
5
The Adoptable Dog
Animals
6
Canine Estates Inc
Animals
7
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
8
Pet Rescue Miami Inc
Animals
9
Anas Safe Haven Rescue Inc

Animal Welfare

Animals
10
Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

Animal Welfare

—
11
The Animal Rescue League
Animals
12
Animal Dominion Rescue

Animal Dominion Rescue is a non-profit organization dedicated to rescuing cats and dogs worldwide, ensuring they find permanent, loving homes. The organization emphasizes direct support to rescuers on the ground, promoting animal welfare,…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Defenders of Animal Rights Inc; the most unlike its peers is Red Bucket Equine Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

180 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 180 of the 348 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
47
Early backer (in before they grew)
178/180
Grantees still filing
137/180
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,657,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONROWAN UNIVERSITY: $1,445,470 · OtherROWAN UNIVERSITYCHABAD AT ROWAN UNIVERSITY: $750,000 · OtherCHABAD AT ROWAN UNIVERSITYCHOP FOUNDATION: $605,000 · OtherCHOP FOUNDATION+109 more: $3,199,399 · Other+109 moreROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,701,000 · EducationROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION I…WILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES: $700,000 · EducationWILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRA…AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC: $550,000 · EducationAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIV…+6 more: $161,000 · EducationPennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $463,335 · AnimalsPennsylvania Soc…NJ AID FOR ANIMALS INC: $210,000 · AnimalsNJ AID FOR ANIMA…Animal Welfare Association Inc: $196,000 · AnimalsAnimal Welfare A…Joybound People and Pets FKA Tony La Russa's Animal Rescue Foundation: $175,000 · AnimalsJoybound People …WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $168,000 · AnimalsWOLF CONSERVATIO…Society For Companion Animals: $141,500 · AnimalsSociety For Comp…NATIONAL HUMANE EDUCATION SOCIETY: $140,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL HUMANE …MAKING OF MIRACLE STORIES ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $115,000 · AnimalsSTRAYDOG INC: $92,000 · Animals+48 more: $553,500 · Animals+48 moreCentral Fund of Israel: $600,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $80,000 · InternationalZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $550,000 · ReligionISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $209,000 · Human ServicesTHE SEEING EYE INC: $44,000 · Human ServicesCORTNEYS PLACE: $30,000 · Human ServicesPAWS AND AFFECTION INC: $22,500 · Human Services+9 more: $67,600 · Human ServicesJEWISH FEDERATION OF ATLANTIC AND CAPE MAY COUNTIES: $128,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $100,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY: $47,930 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $20,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$7,656,869Education$4,112,000Animals$2,254,335International$680,000Religion$550,000Human Services$373,100Philanthropy$305,930

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,701,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetWILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES: $700,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $600,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $550,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC: $550,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetPennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $463,335 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetNJ AID FOR ANIMALS INC: $210,000 over 7y, 41% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $209,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetAnimal Welfare Association Inc: $196,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetJoybound People and Pets FKA Tony La Russa's Animal Rescue Foundation: $175,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $168,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetSociety For Companion Animals: $141,500 over 7y, 6.1% of budgetNATIONAL HUMANE EDUCATION SOCIETY: $140,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF ATLANTIC AND CAPE MAY COUNTIES: $128,000 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetMAKING OF MIRACLE STORIES ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $115,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTRAYDOG INC: $92,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKELLMAN BROWN ACADEMY: $80,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetPACT: $70,000 over 6y, 5.8% of budgetNELLIES SCHOOLHOUSE: $59,000 over 7y, 71% of budgetGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $58,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCRISIS RESPONSE CANINES: $51,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetFOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY: $47,930 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $46,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $45,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $44,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $41,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL AAE INC: $36,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetALMOST HOME ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $32,500 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetCORTNEYS PLACE: $30,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetSTOCKTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW JERSEY INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $25,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Fund for Animals Inc: $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOMEGA HORSE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $25,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPAWS AND AFFECTION INC: $22,500 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetSALEM COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $22,100 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetWOODFORD CEDAR RUN WILDLIFE REFUGE: $21,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCAMDEN COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREYHOUND FRIENDS OF NEW JERSEY INC: $18,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals ↗
  • Who funds NJ AID FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds Animal Welfare Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Joybound People and Pets FKA Tony La Russa's Animal Rescue Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Society For Companion Animals ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL HUMANE EDUCATION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF ATLANTIC AND CAPE MAY COUNTIES ↗
  • Who funds MAKING OF MIRACLE STORIES ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds STRAYDOG INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds KELLMAN BROWN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds PACT ↗
  • Who funds NELLIES SCHOOLHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS RESPONSE CANINES ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PC Fund for Animals C…Bradford Family Found…Seckinger Foundation …Joyce a Ward Foundati…The Susan and Ford Sc…The Patricia Florence…Paula Knickerbocker F…Surendra and Karen Gu…Bernard Weinberg Foun…Duncans and Tuquis Le…Susan & Jerome Ettels…John R Oltman Charita…
PC Fund for Animals Charitable TrWY64.5× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · Bradford Family Foundation · Seckinger Foundation Corporation · Joyce a Ward Foundation · The Susan and Ford Schumann Foundation · The Patricia Florence Miller Trust · Paula Knickerbocker Foundation Inc · Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc Foundation · Bernard Weinberg Foundation · Duncans and Tuquis Legacy Organization Dba Datlo · Susan & Jerome Ettelson Fund · John R Oltman Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gerald B Shreiber Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gerald B Shreiber Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 360%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Center for Family Services: 73% of income from government
  • Acenda Inc Dba Acenda Integrated Health: 69% of income from government
  • Food Bank of South Jersey Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Marine Mammal Stranding Center: 10% of income from government
  • Young Israel of Margate: 3% of income from government
  • People for Animals Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Rowan University Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
36get no government money at all
24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Gerald B Shreiber Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Gerald B Shreiber Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 348 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gerald B Shreiber’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home