· Private foundation
The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k106 grants · $367k
- $10k–50k49 grants · $1.1M
- $50k–250k20 grants · $1.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY | $228,003 |
| FIESTA EVENTS INC | $174,298 |
| YAVAPAI COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES | $150,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA | $124,680 |
| PHOENIX POLICE FOUNDATION INC | $100,000 |
| HEALTHCORPS INC | $100,000 |
| MARICOPA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| UNDUE MEDICAL DEBT | $100,000 |
| 4TH TRIMESTER ARIZONA | $100,000 |
| NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIV FOUND | $100,000 |
| VALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY | $95,000 |
| UNITED PHOENIX FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INC | $75,000 |
| VALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY | $55,000 |
| NOT MY KID INC | $50,000 |
| PRESCOTT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
85 repeat relationships — 58 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 95 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NNOTMYKID3× · 2022–2025 · $325k · revenue +23%
MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC3× · 2023–2025 · $250k · revenue +227%- HIHEALTHCORPS INC3× · 2022–2025 · $248k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAone grant, 2024 · $200k
- NINATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT LLCone grant, 2024 · $162k
- WHWOMEN'S HEALTH INNOVATIONone grant, 2024 · $125k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…
Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.
Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…
To connect, support and inform efforts to improve the health of individuals and communities in arizona.
Mission: cultivate health by supporting individuals and the community at every step of their journey. vision: lead a future in which accessible, high-quality care sets the standard for all. adelante healthcare, a federally qualified health…
Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.
We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.
Our mission is continually to improve the quality of life for the people we serve in collaboration with our diverse communities in a respectful, caring, culturally sensitive manner. The organization provides behavioral health services for…
To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone
CORAZÓN-AZ's mission is to cultivate and foster a welcoming and safe community of Arizonans from vast faith traditions and beliefs, schools, and allied organizations; united in expanding our democracy, economic dignity, immigrant justice,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is ABILITY360 Inc and the most unlike its peers is Melabiz Community Hub. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
244 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 244 of the 318 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds FIESTA EVENTS INC ↗
- Who funds NOTMYKID ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHCORPS INC ↗
- Who funds EL RIO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CREEK VALLEY HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds Creighton University ↗
- Who funds CIRCLE THE CITY ↗
- Who funds CHILDHELP INC ↗
- Who funds CONSTRUYENDO CIRCULES DE PAZ- CONSTRUCTING CIRCLES OF PEACE ↗
- Who funds Rosies House A Music Academy for Children Inc ↗
- Who funds VALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Jessie Rees Foundation ↗
- Who funds TERROS INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHILD CRISIS ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE ↗
- Who funds Arizona Coalition to End Sexual and Domestic Violence Inc ↗
- Who funds Friends of Navajo County Anti-Drug Coalition Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY AWARENESS RESOURCE ENTITY OF ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds UMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds MARICOPA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA'S CHILDREN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Saavi Services for the Blind ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION FORWARD ARIZONA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Thunderbirds Charities · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · BHHS Legacy Foundation · Valley of the Sun United Way · Phoenix Suns Charities Inc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Fiesta Events Inc · Mercy Care · John F Long Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Postpartum Support International — 43% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.